Neoadjuvant camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy and apatinib for locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A single-arm, open-label, phase Ib study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4047-4047
Author(s):  
Zhen Wang
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
End Points ◽  
Grade 3

4047 Background: Neoadjuvant therapy with PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy has been found to be effective in the first-line treatment of advanced esophageal cancer. However, evidence of PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment is limited. This study was designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of camrelizumab, a PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy and apatinib as neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: A regiment of 2–4 cycles of neoadjuvant camrelizumab (200 mg, intravenous, day 1), nab-paclitaxel (150 mg/m2, intravenous, day 1), nedaplatin (50 mg/m2, intravenous, day 1), and apatinib (250 mg, orally, day 2–4) was given to the treatment-naive patients with resectable locally advanced ESCC. The treatments were repeated every 14 days. In this study, six patients were planned to receive two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy as safety assessment, and then 24 patients received four cycles of neoadjuvant therapy, followed by esophagectomy after 4–8 weeks. The primary end points were safety and feasibility. The secondary end points were the rate of major pathologic response (MPR) and pathologic complete response rate (pCR). Results: A total of 30 patients were enrolled, among them, five patients received two planned cycles of neoadjuvant therapy, and one patient missed the second cycle of therapy due to grade 3 ALT elevations. Further, all other 24 patients received four planned cycles of neoadjuvant therapy. A total of 11 patients (11/30, 36.7%) experienced grade 3 neoadjuvant treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). No grade 4 and grade 5 TRAEs were reported. The most frequent grade 3 TRAEs was neutropenia (7/30, 23.3%). Twenty-nine patients underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (McKeown procedure) after neoadjuvant therapy. The reason for not undergoing surgery was due to bone metastasis. There were five treatment-related surgical delays that were caused by adverse reactions (hyperglycemia, arthritis, anemia, leukopenia, capillary endothelial proliferation in oral mucosa). Among the 29 patients undergoing esophagectomy, 15 patients (15/29, 51.7%) achieved MPR, including 7 patients with pCR (7/29, 24.1%). Among the 24 patients who received four cycles of neoadjuvant treatment, there were 7 patients with pCR (7/24, 29.2%), and 14 patients with MPR (14/24, 58.3%). No surgery related mortality was documented. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy plus apatinib is a safe and tolerable treatment for patients with locally advanced ESCC, and the MPR and pCR rate are promising. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1900023880.

Phase-II study of toripalimab combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16029-e16029
Author(s):  
Delin Liu ◽  
Qin Zhang ◽  
Jinghua Zhu ◽  
Ting Qian ◽  
Rong Yin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy ◽  
Grade 3

e16029 Background: Compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone，Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy can significantly increase pCR rate in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and improve patient overall survival. However, the addition of radiotherapy increases the risk of adverse reactions and surgery. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy is currently used in < 5% of Chinese patients.The purpose of this phase II study is to assess the efficacy and safety of toripalimab combined with paclitaxel and cisplatin as neoadjuvant treatment for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR1900025318). Methods: Patients 18–75 years old with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma confirmed by endoscopic biopsy, assessed to be locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (cT1–cT2, N+; cT3–cT4 a, any N), and expected to be resectable were given toripalimab (240 mg d1 + PTX 175 mg/m2 + PDD 75 mg/m2 q3w) before surgery for two treatment cycles, followed by efficacy assessment. A consultation meeting with thoracic surgeons was held to assess radical surgery for patients with resectable lesions 4–6 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy was completed. pCR and postoperative-stage statistical analysis were conducted based on postoperative pathology test results. These results were used to determine the efficacy and safety of PD-1 monoclonal antibody combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Results: By December 2020, 23 subjects were enrolled. Of the subjects, five withdrew without undergoing surgery (three subjects refused surgery and switched to radical radiochemotherapy, one subject progressed to PD after two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy and switched to palliative treatment, and one subject could not undergo surgery after neoadjuvant treatment and gave up the treatment) and 18 evaluable patients underwent surgery. The R0 resection rate was 100%, and T0–Tis 33.3% (6/18) achieved pCR. Among these patients, 61.1% (11/18) achieved T0–T1 after surgery, and 72.2% (13/18) achieved N0. Moreover, stage reduction effects were significant compared with preoperative TN staging. Common side-effects include nausea, vomiting, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, rash, asthenia, constipation, and muscle soreness. Most adverse events were grades 1–2, and grades 3/4 adverse events include one case of grade 3 neutropenia and one case of grade 3 diarrhea (suspected immune-related colitis), which improved after symptomatic treatment. Conclusions: Toripalimab combined with the TP scheme showed preliminary efficacy and controllable safety in the treatment of resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and is worthy of further exploration. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1900025318.

Camrelizumab combined with paclitaxel and nedaplatin as neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESPRIT): A phase Ⅱ, single-arm, exploratory research.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16033-e16033
Author(s):  
Jianqun Ma ◽  
Jinfeng Zhang ◽  
Yingnan Yang ◽  
Dayong Zheng ◽  
Xiaoyuan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Radical Surgery ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Therapeutic Effects

e16033 Background: Camrelizumab has been approved as a standard therapy in the second-line treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with commonly used neoadjuvant chemotherapy (paclitaxel and platinum) in neoadjuvant treatment of ESCC. Methods: In this single-arm, phase Ⅱ study, patients with advanced ESCC who were expected to receive neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical surgery were recruited. The patients received 2-4 cycles of camrelizumab (200mg, iv, q3w) in combination with paclitaxel (155mg/m2, iv, q3w) and nedaplatin (80mg/m2, iv, q3w) as neoadjuvant therapy, and the therapeutic effects were determined every 2 cycles. The radical surgery was performed on patients whose tumors were evaluated as resectable. The primary endpoint was pCR, and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Results: From May 2020 to January 2021, 24 patients with a median age of 60.5 years (50-73) were enrolled. Among them, 21 patients were available for efficacy analysis, of which 1 achieved complete response (CR), 7 achieved partial response (PR), and 13 had stable disease (SD). The ORR was 38.1% and DCR was 100%. The tumor in 10 patients shrank significantly after neoadjuvant therapy and these patients preferred radiotherapy instead of surgery as the radical therapeutic method. 2 patients abandoned surgery because of personal reasons. 2 patients were in the process of neoadjuvant therapy and had not undergone surgery yet. The remaining 7 patients underwent radical surgery and 4 patients (57.14%) achieved pCR (pT0N0M0). The main treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse event (AE) was neutropenia (1/21). All the AEs were manageable. The average intraoperative blood loss was 221mL and the average hospitalization time after operation was 12.7 days (range 8-19 days). No anastomotic leakage and treatment-related death occurred. Conclusions: Camrelizumab in combination with paclitaxel and platinum as a neoadjuvant therapy was well tolerated. The pCR rate of 57.14% was higher than the expected 40%. This encouraging result promoted us to continue this phase Ⅱ study. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2000033761.

scholarly journals Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi-Lei Zhou ◽  
Chang-Hua Yu ◽  
Wan-Wei Wang ◽  
Fu-Zhi Ji ◽  
Yao-Zu Xiong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background This retrospective study was to assess and compare the toxicity and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with S-1 or docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods Patients with locally advanced ESCC who received CCRT with S-1 (70 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14, every 3 weeks for 2 cycles, S-1 group) or docetaxel (25 mg/m2) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) on day 1 weekly (DP group) between 2014 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Radiotherapy was delivered in 1.8–2.0 Gy per fraction to a total dose of 50–60 Gy. Treatment-related toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0), response rate, and survival outcomes were compared between groups. Results A total of 175 patients were included in this study (72 in the S-1 group and 103 in the DP group). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events were significantly lower in the S-1 group than that of the DP group (22.2% vs. 45.6%, p = 0.002). In the DP group, elderly patients (> 60 years) had a significantly higher rate of grade 3–4 adverse events than younger patients (58.1% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.01). The objective overall response rate (complete response + partial response) was 68.1% in the S-1 group, and 73.8% the DP group (p = 0.497). The 3-year overall survival was 34.7% in the S-1 group, and 38.8% in the DP group (p = 0.422). The 3-year progression free survival in the DP group was higher than that in the S-1 group but without significant difference (33.0% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.275). Conclusion CCRT with S-1 is not inferior to CCRT with docetaxel and cisplatin and is better tolerated in in elderly patients with locally advanced ESCC.

scholarly journals New Trend of Surgery in Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatcha Rerkrak ◽  
Somkiat Sunpaweravong
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Preoperative Chemoradiation ◽  
Salvage Esophagectomy

The treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is still controversial. Although, preoperative chemoradiation, followed by esophagectomy is the standard treatment, morbidity and patients’ quality of life problems after an esophagectomy are still considerable. Since a good pathologic complete response rate in patients after preoperative chemoradiation, a wait and see policy (with active surveillance) has been introduced as a new alternative approach after chemoradiation. Active surveillance involves imaging and biopsy evaluations in patients after chemoradiation to detect residual or recurrent tumors. If there are no residual tumors, observation is considered. Surgery is reserved for patients who present with residual tumors or locoregional recurrence after surveillance to achieve complete resection (salvage esophagectomy). Based on evidence from recent studies, surveillance with salvage esophagectomy is a treatment option for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients achieving a clinical complete response after chemoradiation.

Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with/without esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15526-e15526
Author(s):  
C. Lin ◽  
C. Hsu ◽  
J. C. Cheng ◽  
J. Lee ◽  
Y. Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response

e15526 Background: To assess the feasibility of preoperative induction chemotherapy in addition to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by esophagectomy if possible for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with a special emphasis on M1a or nodal M1b disease. Methods: Patients who had histologic proof of T3N1M0, M1a, or nodal M1b ESCC first received up to 3 courses of induction chemotherapy (paclitaxel 70 mg/m2 or docetaxel 40 mg/m2 IV 1-hr D 1, 8; cisplatin 35 mg/m2 IV 2-hr D 1, 8; 5-fluorouracil 2000 and leucovorin 300 mg/m2 IV 24-hr D 1, 8; repeated every 28 days). This was followed by CCRT (paclitaxel 35 mg/m2 1-hr D 1, 4 /wk, cisplatin 15 mg/m2 1-hr D 2, 5/wk, and radiotherapy 2 Gy D 1–5 /wk) (Lin CC et al. Ann Oncol 18:93–8,2007). When the accumulated radiation dose reached 40 Gy, the feasibility of esophagectomy was evaluated in all patients. In patients for whom esophagectomy was not feasible, CCRT was continued to a dose of 60 Gy. Results: Fifty-six patients (M:F = 51:5, median age 58, range 41–78) with locally advanced (T3N1M0:M1a:M1b[nodal] = 30:7:19) ESCC (upper:mid:lower = 15:25:16) were enrolled from June 22, 2006 to December 17, 2008. By December 31, 2008, 10 patients are still under protocol treatment. Eighteen (T3N1:M1a:M1b[nodal] = 14:3:1) (40%) and 20 of 46 patients underwent surgery and continued CCRT up to 60 Gy, respectively. Nine (T3N1:M1a:M1b[nodal] = 7:2:0) (20%) and 5 patients had pathologic complete response and microscopic residual disease, respectively. With a median follow-up of 8.4 months (range 0.5–30.8), 17 (T3N1:M1a:M1b[nodal] = 9:2:6) patients had relapse. Four and 13 patients had local recurrence and distant metastasis, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 20.3 months. The median overall survival had not reached yet with 1- and 2-year overall survival being 76 and 57%, respectively. There was no difference in progression- free or overall survival among patients with T3N1M0, M1a, or nodal M1b disease. Conclusions: Three-step strategy of preoperative taxane-based induction chemotherapy then CCRT followed by esosphagectomy if possible appears quite active in locally advanced ESCC patients with 46% having M1a or nodal M1b disease. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document