Letermovir prophylaxis and cytomegalovirus reactivation in adult allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients with graft versus host disease.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7004-7004
Author(s):  
Delaney Wolfe ◽  
Qiuhong Zhao ◽  
Emma G Siegel ◽  
Marcin M Puto ◽  
Yvonne Adeduni Efebera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Competing Risk ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cmv Infection ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Cmv Reactivation

7004 Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common clinically significant infection after allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and is associated with increased mortality. The risk for CMV reactivation increases with HLA mismatch, high dose corticosteroids, and graft versus host disease (GVHD). GVHD contributes to significant morbidity and mortality and is treated with immunosuppressive therapies that further increase CMV infection risk. In a phase III trial, letermovir prophylaxis had a lower incidence of CMV infection post-allo-HCT in patients at high risk of CMV reactivation when compared to placebo when given up to day +100. There is a lack of data concerning the effectiveness of letermovir in patients who develop GVHD and may continue letermovir past day +100. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study conducted at The Ohio State University. Demographics and transplant details were collected from medical records. The primary outcome was incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMVi) within 200 days of allo-HCT. Secondary outcomes included incidence of CMV viremia, duration of letermovir therapy, mortality, and risk factors for CS-CMVi. Early death without CMV was treated as a competing risk for CS-CMVi, while relapse was a competing risk for non-relapse mortality (NRM). Proportional subdistribution or Cox hazards models were used to evaluate the association between use of letermovir and risk of CS-CMVi, NRM, or overall survival (OS) adjusting for potential confounding factors, where use of letermovir and GVHD were treated as time-dependent variables. Results: A total of 262 CMV-seropositive patients who received an allo-HCT between June 1, 2016 and June 30, 2020 were included. Of these, 119 patients received letermovir prophylaxis. A total of 111 patients received treatment for CS-CMVi, which included 82 of 143 (57%) who did not receive letermovir compared to 29 of 119 (24%) who received letermovir. Incidence of CMV viremia was significantly reduced with the use of letermovir in all patients (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.12–0.34, p < 0.001) and among patients with acute GVHD grade >2 within 200 days post-allo-HCT (HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.05–0.32, p < 0.001), adjusting for age, gender, GVHD prophylaxis and use of ATG or T-cell depleted graft. The median duration of letermovir therapy was 97 days. Nine patients were continued on letermovir indefinitely for recurrent CMV viremia. Patients who received letermovir had decreased NRM (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18-0.96, p = 0.04) and improved OS (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.95, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Letermovir prophylaxis significantly decreased CS-CMVi and improved NRM and OS in this real-world analysis. In addition, patients with acute GVHD had significantly less CMV viremia, suggesting potential benefit in continuing letermovir prophylaxis in this patient population.

scholarly journals Letermovir Prophylaxis and Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Adult Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients with and without Acute Graft Versus Host Disease

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 5572
Author(s):  
Delaney Wolfe ◽  
Qiuhong Zhao ◽  
Emma Siegel ◽  
Marcin Puto ◽  
Danielle Murphy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Cmv Infection ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Cmv Reactivation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most clinically significant infection after allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and is associated with increased mortality. The risk for CMV reactivation increases with graft versus host disease (GVHD). GVHD contributes to significant morbidity and mortality and is treated with immunosuppressive therapies that can further increase CMV infection risk. Prophylaxis with letermovir, an oral antiviral approved to prevent CMV, has been shown to decrease the incidence of CMV infection post-allo-HCT in patients at high risk of CMV reactivation, but there is a lack of data confirming this benefit in patients with GVHD. In this single-center, retrospective study, we assessed the incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMVi) in allo-HCT patients who received letermovir prophylaxis (n = 119) and who developed aGVHD compared to a control group (n = 143) who did not receive letermovir. Among aGVHD patients, letermovir prophylaxis decreased CS-CMVi in patients with aGVHD (HR 0.08 [95% CI 0.03–0.27], p < 0.001), reduced non-relapsed mortality (p = 0.04) and improved overall survival (p = 0.04). This data suggests that letermovir prophylaxis improves outcomes by preventing CS-CMVi in patients with aGVHD.

scholarly journals Predictive factors for acute graft-versus-host disease in patients transplanted with HLA-identical bone marrow

Blood ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 1265-1270 ◽  
Author(s):  
DS Bross ◽  
PJ Tutschka ◽  
ER Farmer ◽  
WE Beschorner ◽  
HG Braine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Predictive Parameters ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Mismatched Donor ◽  
Acute Graft

Abstract To identify predictive parameters for incidence and severity of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), 136 patients, transplanted with histocompatible marrow as therapy for aplastic anemia and hematologic malignancies, were examined using univariate and multivariate analyses. The risk of GVHD increased in patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia (p less than 0.05), in sex-mismatched donor-recipient pairs (p less than 0.01), and in patients older than 23.7 yr (p less than 0.05). No other commonly observed factors appeared to have any relationship to GVHD except the presence of certain alleles. The presence of a Cw4 allele or of the Bw21 specificities B49 and B50 were associated with significantly increased risks of GVHD (p less than 0.05), whereas the presence of Aw19 (or the related specificities A29, Aw30, Aw31 , Aw32, Aw33 ) was associated with a significantly decreased risk (p less than 0.01). Using these factors, a regression equation can be constructed that estimates the risk of a given patient to develop clinically significant acute GVHD.

Serious Acute or Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Comparison of Myeloablative and Non-Myeloablative Conditioning Regimens.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 755-755
Author(s):  
Olga Sala-Torra ◽  
Paul J. Martin ◽  
Barry Storer ◽  
Mohamed Sorror ◽  
Rainer F. Storb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Co Morbidity

Abstract We have previously described serious graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) as a highly undesirable outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Serious GVHD encompasses death, lengthy hospitalization, major disability, or recurrent major infections related to either acute or chronic GVHD. In a previous study, we found a 25% incidence of serious GVHD among 171 consecutive patients who had HCT after non-myeloablative (NMA) conditioning between January 1998 and May 2002. To put this observation into perspective, we applied the same criteria for serious GVHD in a cohort of 264 consecutive patients who had HCT after myeloablative (MA) conditioning during the same period of time and compared results with those of the previous study. The overall incidence of serious GVHD was 17% (44/264) in the MA group, compared to 25% (43/171) in the NMA group. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of grades III–IV GVHD, extensive chronic GVHD or nonrelapse mortality between the two groups (Table). Patients in the NMA group were older and had higher comorbidity scores than those in the MA group. In the univariate analysis, the hazard ratio (HR) of serious GVHD for the NMA group compared to the MA group was 1.71 (95% C.I., 1.1–2.6) (p = 0.01). After adjusting for patient age, patient and donor gender, donor type, HLA-mismatch, aggressive versus indolent malignancy at HCT, remission versus relapse at HCT, myeloid versus non–myeloid malignancy, HCT co–morbidity index, and prior donor lymphocyte infusion, the HR of serious GVHD was 1.50 (95% C.I., 0.8–2.7) (p = 0.17). After censoring for recurrent or progressive malignancy after HCT, the cumulative incidence of serious GVHD at 3 years was 21% for the NMA group and 14% for the MA group, and the HR was 1.33 (95% C.I., 0.7–2.6) (p = 0.40). Reasons for categorization of GVHD as serious (i.e., death, lengthy hospitalization, major disability, or recurrent major infections) were similar between the MA and NMA cohorts. Among the 44 patients with serious GVHD in the MA group, 19 (43%) had serious acute GVHD, and 25 (57%) had serious chronic GVHD. Among the 43 patients with serious GVHD in the NMA group, 20 (46%) had serious acute GVHD, and 30 (70%) had serious chronic GVHD. Among the 264 MA patients, 28 (11%) had grade III–IV acute GVHD and 147 (56%) had extensive chronic GVHD that did not meet the criteria for serious GVHD, compared to 7 (4%) and 84 (49%) of the 171 NMA patients, respectively. We conclude that the type of pretransplant conditioning regimen does not have a large effect on the incidence of serious GVHD after HCT. Assessment of serious GVHD provides additional useful information to acute GVHD grades and the classification of limited and extensive chronic GVHD in describing overall GVHD-related outcomes after HCT. MA NMA Outcome, n (%) n = 264 n = 171 Serious GVHD 44 (17) 43 (25) Grades III–IV acute GVHD 54 (20) 27 (16) Extensive chronic GVHD 174 (66) 114 (68) 2-year nonrelapse mortality 66 (25) 43 (25)

The Bidirectional Relationship Between Cytomegalovirus Replication and Graft-Versus-Host Disease - a Retrospective Single Center Study.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2236-2236
Author(s):  
Nathan Cantoni ◽  
Hans H Hirsch ◽  
Nina Khanna ◽  
Dominik Heim ◽  
Joerg Halter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Cmv Infection ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Cmv Reactivation ◽  
Multiple Episodes

Abstract Abstract 2236 Poster Board II-213 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and graft-versus host disease (GVHD) are important complications after allogeneic HSCT with a clear link. Multiple studies show that GVHD and its treatment put patients at risk for CMV reactivation. Data on CMV infection as a cause of GVHD, in contrast, are controversial. The association of pre-transplant CMV serology with GVHD development and reduced rates of chronic GVHD after preemptive CMV treatment are indicative of such an association. However, analyses of the direct impact of CMV infection on GVHD are rare; a recent small study found no effect of CMV replication on subsequent development of acute GVHD (Wang et al, BMT 2008). We analyzed in a single centre study the association of CMV reactivation with acute GVHD in 517 patients treated between 1993 and 2008. 59% of patients were male, median age was 42 years (range 16 to 70). Diagnoses were AML (31%), ALL (16%), CML (15%), MDS/MPN (13%), lymphoma (21%), and other (4%). Conditioning regimens were Cy/TBI ±/- etoposide (49%), Cy/Bu (17%), fludarabine and TBI (16%), or others (18%). GVHD prophylaxis consisted of CyA/MTX (78%) or CyA/MMF (21%). Donors were HLA-identical siblings (65%), other family members (4%), or unrelated donors (31%). We made use of a standardized CMV policy over the last decades. CMV reactivation was monitored using real-time polymerase chain reaction or pp65 antigenemia assay weekly in patients without infection, twice weekly in patients with CMV replication. CMV was preemptively treated with gancyclovir or foscarnet. To determine the correlation of CMV infection with acute GVHD, we used a stringent Cox regression model, in which CMV replication was modeled as a time-dependent covariate becoming positive on the day of the first detection of CMV and negative on the first negative assay thereafter. Multiple episodes of CMV replication were considered. Acute GVHD was modeled as a time-dependent covariate in models with CMV infection as endpoint. Hazard ratios (HR) were adjusted for patient age, disease, disease stage, donor type, stem cell source, conditioning regimen and GVHD prophylaxis. The analysis was restricted to the time from transplant to day 100. CMV reactivation was detected at least once in 16% (84/517) of patients at a median of 33 (range 1-95) days after HSCT. Median duration of CMV reactivation was 8.5 days (range 2-62). 19 patients showed multiple episodes of CMV replication. Donor and recipient serostatus significantly influenced the day 100 cumulative incidence of CMV infection: D-/R- (N=173) 6%; D±/R- (N=61) 10%; D±/R± (N=128) 25%; and D-/R± (N=99) 37%, p<0.001. The cumulative incidence for any acute GVHD (grade I-IV) was 67% (95% CI 56-78%) with a median onset time at day 14 (range day 5-94); the cumulative incidence for severe acute GVHD (grade II-IV) was 48% (95% CI 40-56%). When both endpoints (CMV, GVHD) were combined, 150 patients (29%) experienced neither GVHD nor CMV reactivation, 281 (54%) GVHD only, 19 (4%) CMV reactivation only, and 67 (13%) both CMV reactivation and GVHD. Of the 67 patients with both GVHD and CMV, 46 (69%) developed GVHD prior to CMV reactivation, 17 (25%) developed GVHD during CMV reactivation, and 4 (6%) developed GVHD after CMV reactivation. Cox modeling revealed that presence of GVHD grade II-IV increased the risk of CMV infection (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.03-2.52, p=0.04). Similarly, patients were at increased risk of developing acute GVHD during phases of CMV replication (grades I-IV: HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.39-3.81, p=0.001; grades II-IV: HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.08-3.72, p=0.03). GVHD grade was not influenced by concomitant CMV reactivation (median grade II, in patients with or without CMV reactivation). The overall proportion of GVHD that occurred during phases of CMV replication was small (3% versus 64% occurring in CMV non replicating patients). Even if GVHD occurring after resolution of CMV reactivation was additionally taken into account, the majority of GVHD occurred without preceding CMV infection (63% versus 4%). These data describe the complex relationship between CMV infection and GVHD. We confirm previous studies that GVHD (and GVHD therapy) can induce CMV infection. We describe as well that patients with active CMV replication have a significantly higher risk of developing GVHD compared to patients without CMV replication. However, the proportion of GVHD that could be linked to CMV reactivation was small in this population with a low overall incidence of CMV reactivation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Association of IL-10 and IL-10 Receptor Gene Polymorphisms and Graft-Versus-Host Disease Following Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 421-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-Hui Tseng ◽  
Ming-Tseh Lin ◽  
Barry Storer ◽  
Paul J. Martin ◽  
Bryan Grogan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
P Value ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host

Abstract Polymorphisms in cytokine genes can influence immune responses and may affect the outcome of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We have shown that the IL-10/-592*A allele of the recipient is a marker for less severe acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and a lower risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM) after HCT from an HLA-identical sibling (N Engl J Med, 2003). To further test the hypothesis that IL-10 pathway is important in the intensity of acute GVHD, we undertook a study of variation in the IL-10 receptor β gene. A single nucleotide polymorphism (A/G) at cDNA position 238 of the IL-10 receptor β gene (IL-10RB/1304) was genotyped in 953 HCT recipients and their HLA-identical sibling donors. IL-10/-592 and IL-10RB alleles and genotypes were tested for association with GVHD by multivariable analysis. The IL-10/-592*A allele of the recipient and IL-10RB/238*G allele of the donor were significantly associated with a lower risk of acute grades III-IV GVHD (trend p value 0.0008 and 0.02, respectively). None of the 16 cases with a patient IL-10 A/A genotype and donor IL-10RB G/G genotype developed grades III-IV acute GVHD (HR = 0.0 and p value = 0.007), compared to pairs with a patient IL-10 C/C genotype and donor IL-10RB A/A genotype. The hazard ratios were 0.4–0.6 among pairs with a patient IL-10 A/A genotype and donor IL-10RB A/G or A/A genotype and among pairs with a patient IL-10 A/C genotype and donor IL-10RB G/G or A/G genotype. The effect of donor IL-10RB genotype on GVHD was observed only among pairs with a patient IL-10 A/C or A/A genotype (trend p value = 0.005 and 0.06 respectively), but not among pairs with a patient IL-10 C/C genotype (trend p value = 0.82). These data suggest an interaction in the effect of the patient IL-10/-592 and donor IL-10RB/1304 genotypes on GVHD, further supporting the hypothesis that the IL-10 pathway plays an important role in controlling the severity of acute GVHD.

scholarly journals Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Clinical Trial of Anti–T-Lymphocyte Globulin to Assess Impact on Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease–Free Survival in Patients Undergoing HLA-Matched Unrelated Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (36) ◽  
pp. 4003-4011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Soiffer ◽  
Haesook T. Kim ◽  
Joseph McGuirk ◽  
Mitchell E. Horwitz ◽  
Laura Johnston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
T Lymphocyte ◽  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host

Purpose Several open-label randomized studies have suggested that in vivo T-cell depletion with anti–T-lymphocyte globulin (ATLG; formerly antithymocyte globulin-Fresenius) reduces chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) without compromising survival. We report a prospective, double-blind phase III trial to investigate the effect of ATLG (Neovii Biotech, Lexington, MA) on cGVHD-free survival. Patients and Methods Two hundred fifty-four patients 18 to 65 years of age with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome who underwent myeloablative HLA-matched unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) were randomly assigned one to one to placebo (n =128 placebo) or ATLG (n = 126) treatment at 27 sites. Patients received either ATLG or placebo 20 mg/kg per day on days −3, −2, −1 in addition to tacrolimus and methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis. The primary study end point was moderate-severe cGVHD-free survival. Results Despite a reduction in grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD (23% v 40%; P = .004) and moderate-severe cGVHD (12% v 33%; P < .001) in ATLG recipients, no difference in moderate-severe cGVHD-free survival between ATLG and placebo was found (2-year estimate: 48% v 44%, respectively; P = .47). Both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were lower with ATLG (2-year estimate: 47% v 65% [ P = .04] and 59% v 74% [ P = .034], respectively). Multivariable analysis confirmed that ATLG was associated with inferior PFS (hazard ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.05 to 2.28; P = .026) and OS (hazard ratio, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.12 to 2.71; P = .01). Conclusion In this prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of ATLG in unrelated myeloablative HCT, the incorporation of ATLG did not improve moderate-severe cGVHD-free survival. Moderate-severe cGVHD was significantly lower with ATLG, but PFS and OS also were lower. Additional analyses are needed to understand the appropriate role for ATLG in HCT.

scholarly journals Abatacept-based Graft-Versus-Host-Disease Prophylaxis in Haplo-identical Hematopoietic Cell Transplant: Single Center Experience in a High-Risk Cohort

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enass Raffa ◽  
Anand Srinivasan ◽  
Donna Wall ◽  
Tal Schechter ◽  
Muhammad Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Immunosuppressive Agents ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplant ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has become the most popular approach in haplo-identical hematopoietic cell transplant (haplo-HCT). Although there are reports of a small number of adult patients in the literature who experienced graft failure and were re-transplanted with a haploidentical donor with PTCy prophylaxis, there is still insufficient guidance for patients with specific contraindications/complications to cyclophosphamide and virtually no data in the pediatric setting. Abatacept (Aba), a T cell co-stimulation blockade, has been shown in previous studies to prevent severe acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with minimal toxicity and durable engraftment. We report the efficacy of Aba-based GVHD prophylaxis in four pediatrics patients (ages 2-12 years) who received a haplo-HCT with peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). Three patients had previous transplants. One patient developed acute GVHD of skin stage 3 and one patient had both stage 3 skin and stage 1 GI acute GVHD. Two patients had mild chronic skin GVHD. All 4 patients are alive with full donor chimerism and without disease at 7-23 months follow up, weaning or off immunosuppressive agents with no complications. Successful haplo-HCT utilizing an Aba- based regimen can result in reliable engraftment and acceptable GVHD. However, our small sample size limits generalizability and encourages the consideration of a larger prospective trial to validate these results in the haplo-HCT setting.

Prospective Evaluation of Graft-Versus-Host Disease-Specific Proteomics Pattern in Patients after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 3093-3093
Author(s):  
Eva M. Weissinger ◽  
Meike Hillmann ◽  
Hans-Jochem Kolb ◽  
Axel R. Zander ◽  
Ernst Holler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Early Recognition ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Proteome Analysis ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Polypeptide Patterns ◽  
Cmv Reactivation

Abstract We have recently described and published a proteomic pattern specific for the early diagnosis of acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD), based on the application of capillary electrophoresis (CE) and mass spectrometry (MS). Here we report the application of proteome based GvHD-patterns to prospectively collected samples from 86 patients (45 AML, 14 ALL, 8 MM, 5 CLL, 5 SAA, 3 MDS, 3CML, 3 NHL). Fifty three patients were transplanted from matched unrelated donors (MUD), 29 received stem cells from matched related donors (MRD), 3 from haplo-identical donors and 1 was transplanted from a syngeneic sibling. GvHD prophylaxis was methotrexat or mycophenolate and cyclosporin A in the majority of the patients. The follow up is currently between 60 and 549 days after allogeneic HSCT. Urine samples were collected on ice prior conditioning, once a week and monthly after day +60. To avoid degradation of the proteins/peptides the samples were frozen as soon as possible. After thawing and removal of confounding substances, like salts, lipids and of all molecules larger than 30 kDa, the samples were loaded onto the CE, separated according to their charge and, after ionization, directly analyzed in an electrospray ionization time of flight (ESI-TOF) -MS. Between 500 and 2500 peptides and proteins were detected in individual samples. All data generated are stored in a Microsoft MS database. Reproducibility of these analyses is greater 98%. The polypeptide patterns specific for the early detection of acute GvHD were applied to the data generated prospectively and the outcome of these analyses was compared to the clinical diagnosis of aGvHD, sepsis and CMV-reactivation. Forty patients were diagnosed with aGvHD in the current evaluation period, 18 had aGvHD ≥ II. From 461 samples, 68 gave a score with the aGvHD pattern, 15 were false positive, whereas 5 scored false negative. The sensitivity of the aGvHD pattern is more than 90%, the specificity is about 96%. Thus the application of the aGvHD pattern for early recognition of acute GvHD is very useful for predicting the development of aGvHD. In addition, we are currently evaluating samples of patients with chronic GvHD (cGvHD). Seven patients in the prospective cohort have developed cGvHD so far. First results show that in the majority of the patients the cGVHD markers are different from those forming the aGvHD pattern. The polypeptide patterns for aGvHD and cGvHD will be discussed together with those of other complications, like CMV-reactivation or sepsis. Taken together our results demonstrate that the proteome analysis of body fluids collected from patients after HSCT maybe extremely useful for diagnosis of complications.

Randomized Phase III BMT CTN Trial of Calcineurin Inhibitor–Free Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease Interventions in Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leo Luznik ◽  
Marcelo C. Pasquini ◽  
Brent Logan ◽  
Robert J. Soiffer ◽  
Juan Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Cd34 Selection

PURPOSE Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) are standard components of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Prior data suggested that CNI-free approaches using donor T-cell depletion, either by ex vivo CD34 selection or in vivo post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as a single agent, are associated with lower rates of chronic GVHD (cGVHD). METHODS This multicenter phase III trial randomly assigned patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplasia and an HLA-matched donor to receive CD34-selected peripheral blood stem cell, PTCy after a bone marrow (BM) graft, or tacrolimus and methotrexate after BM graft (control). The primary end point was cGVHD (moderate or severe) or relapse-free survival (CRFS). RESULTS Among 346 patients enrolled, 327 received HCT, 300 per protocol. Intent-to-treat rates of 2-year CRFS were 50.6% for CD34 selection (hazard ratio [HR] compared with control, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.15; P = .24), 48.1% for PTCy (HR, 0.86; 0.61 to 1.23; P = .41), and 41.0% for control. Corresponding rates of overall survival were 60.1% (HR, 1.74; 1.09 to 2.80; P = .02), 76.2% (HR, 1.02; 0.60 to 1.72; P = .95), and 76.1%. CD34 selection was associated with lower moderate to severe cGVHD (HR, 0.25; 0.12 to 0.52; P = .02) but higher transplant-related mortality (HR, 2.76; 1.26 to 6.06; P = .01). PTCy was associated with comparable cGVHD and survival outcomes to control, and a trend toward lower disease relapse (HR, 0.52; 0.28 to 0.96; P = .037). CONCLUSION CNI-free interventions as performed herein did not result in superior CRFS compared with tacrolimus and methotrexate with BM. Lower rates of moderate and severe cGVHD did not translate into improved survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document