Characterizing safety and efficacy in ovarian cancer patients with thromboembolism treated with rivaroxaban.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18720-e18720
Author(s):  
Christine G. Kohn ◽  
Jonathan T. Caranfa ◽  
Molly Brewer ◽  
Meghana Singh ◽  
Craig I. Coleman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Emergency Department Admission ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Treatment Analysis

e18720 Background: There is a paucity of real-world data regarding rates of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding and all-cause mortality among ovarian cancer patients with thrombosis treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) currently available. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus low molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) treatment in patients with ovarian cancer. Methods: We utilized US Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare–linked data from 2013-2016 to identify adults with active ovarian cancer, undergoing hospitalization/emergency department admission for CAT and prescribed rivaroxaban or LMWH for outpatient anticoagulation. Rivaroxaban and LMWH cohorts were balanced using propensity score overlap weighting . Outcomes included the composite of recurrent thrombosis or major bleeding, each outcome separately and mortality at six-months using an intention-to-treat approach. On-treatment analysis after 12-months was also performed. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals using overlap weighted cox regression were reported. Results: We included 33 rivaroxaban and 92 LMWH-managed CAT patients. In each cohort, mean age was 73, 79.5% of patients were white, 46.9% had a history of ≥ stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD), two-thirds had metastatic disease at the time of VTE, and 32.6% had a prior VTE. Patients were diagnosed with ovarian cancer an average of 1.40 years prior to the index VTE event and 45.8% had a pulmonary embolism (with or without DVT) as the index event. Our analysis did not detect a significant difference in outcomes with rivaroxaban versus LMWH at six-months (Table). On-treatment analysis at 12-months showed similar results. Conclusions: Rivaroxaban may be a reasonable alternative to LMWH for CAT patients with ovarian cancer. Large observational studies are needed to confirm these results.[Table: see text]

scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in malignancy induced venous thromboembolism-a systematic review and meta analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Abdul Razzack ◽  
N Hussain ◽  
S Adeel Hassan ◽  
S Mandava ◽  
F Yasmin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Dichotomous Data ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background- Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been proven to be more effective in the management of venous thromboembolism (MVTE). The efficacy and safety of LMWH or DOACs in treatment of recurrent or malignancy induced VTE is not studied in literature. Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of LMWH and  DOACs in the management of malignancy induced  VTE Methods- Electronic databases ( PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane) were searched from inception to November  28th, 2020. Dichotomous data was extracted for prevention of VTE and risk of major bleeding in patients taking either LMWH or DOACs. Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated from dichotomous data using Mantel Haenszel (M-H) random-effects with statistical significance to be considered if the confidence interval excludes 1 and p < 0.05.  Results- Three studies with 2607 patients (DOACs n = 1301 ; LMWH n = 1306) were included in analysis. All the study population had active cancer of any kind diagnosed within the past 6 months. Average follow-up period for each trial was 6 months. Patients receiving DOACs have a lower odds of recurrence of MVTE as compared to LMWH( OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.17-2.09; P = 0.003, I2 = 0). There was no significant difference in major bleeding among patients receiving LMWH or DOACs  (OR-0.71, 95%CI 0.46-1.10, P = 0.13, I2 = 22%) (Figure 1). We had no publication bias in our results (Egger’s regression p > 0.05). Conclusion- DOACs are superior to LMWH in prevention of MVTE and have similar major bleeding risk as that of LMWH. Abstract Figure. A)VTE Recurrence B)Major Bleeding events

458Real world persistence with direct oral anticoagulants in anticoagulation naive patients with atrial fibrillation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Denas ◽  
G Costa ◽  
E Ferroni ◽  
N Gennaro ◽  
U Fedeli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Real World Data

Abstract Introduction Anticoagulation therapy is central for the management of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Persistence with oral anticoagulation is essential to prevent thromboembolic complications. Purpose To assess persistence levels of DOACs and look for possible predictors of treatment discontinuity in NVAF patients. Methods We performed a population-based retrospective cohort study in the Veneto Region (north-eastern Italy, about 5 million inhabitants) using the regional health system databases. Naïve patients initiating direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention in NVAF from July 2013 to September 2017 were included in the study. Patients were identified using Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) codes, excluding other indications for anticoagulation therapy using ICD-9CM codes. Treatment persistence was defined as the time from initiation to discontinuation of the therapy. Baseline characteristics and comorbidities associated to the persistence of therapy with DOACs were explored by means of Kaplan-Meier curves and assessed through Cox regression. Results Overall, 17920 patients initiated anticoagulation with DOACs in the study period. Most patients were older than 74 years old, while gender was almost equally represented. Comorbidities included hypertension (72%), diabetes mellitus (17%), congestive heart failure (9%), previous stroke/TIA (20%), and prior myocardial infarction (2%). After one year, the persistence to anticoagulation treatment was 82.7%, while the persistence to DOAC treatment was 72.9% with about 10% of the discontinuations being due to switch to VKAs. On multivariate analysis, factors negatively affecting persistence were female gender, younger age (<65 years), renal disease and history of bleeding. Conversely, persistence was better in patients with hypertension, previous cerebral ischemic events, and previous acute myocardial infarction. Persistence to DOAC therapy Conclusion This real-world data show that within 12 months, one out of four anticoagulation-naïve patients stop DOACs, while one out of five patients stop anticoagulation. Efforts should be made to correct modifiable predictors and intensify patient education.

scholarly journals Bleeding Risk in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3672-3672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yimin Pearl Wang ◽  
Rohan Kehar ◽  
Alla Iansavitchene ◽  
Alejandro Lazo-Langner
Keyword(s):  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: The standard oral anticoagulant therapy administered to non-valvular AF patients has typically been Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) particularly warfarin. In recent years, Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) including Direct Thrombin Inhibitors (DTI) and Direct Factor Xa inhibitors (FXa inhibitors) have become an alternative to warfarin. Randomized trials comparing warfarin and DOACs showed comparable effectiveness without significant additional major bleeding risk. However, bleeding events in RCTs may differ from those in daily use due to the routine exclusion of patients with a higher risk of bleeding from many studies. We aimed to assess bleeding risk between DOACs and warfarin in AF patients in observational studies and we also sought to determine differences between patients that were experienced or naïve to oral anticoagulants. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the OVID MEDLINE® and EMBASE® electronic databases. Observational studies and randomized control trials (RCT) from 1990 to January 2019 were retrieved and examined by two independent reviewers. A pooled effect hazard ratio (HR) was calculated using a random effects model using the generic inverse variance method. Subgroup analyses according to previous exposure to anticoagulants, study type, funding type and DOAC type were conducted. The primary outcome was major bleeding risk. The secondary outcome was clinically relevant non-major bleeding. All studies must have used an established or validated definition of major bleeding. Results: The initial literature search identified 3359 potentially eligible citations. After primary screening, 150 articles were eligible for full text review and there were 35 studies including 2,356,201 patients that met the inclusion criteria. Overall, patients on DOACs were less likely to experience a bleeding event compared to warfarin (HR 0.78, 95%CI 0.71, 0.85, P&lt;0.001). The results were consistent when analyzing patients receiving DTIs or FXa inhibitors (DTI: HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67,0.87; FXa inhibitors: HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69,0.89). However, among patients receiving factor Xa inhibitors, there was a significant difference in the risk of bleeding according to individual drug. Among patients receiving rivaroxaban the risk of bleeding was similar to warfarin (HR 0.98, 95%CI 0.91,1.06, p=0.60) whereas in those receiving apixaban there was a 40% reduction in the risk of bleeding compared to warfarin (HR 0.60, 95%CI 0.50,0.71, p&lt;0.001) (Figure 1). Three studies reported information according to previous anticoagulant exposure. The overall pooled hazard ratio was 0.68 (95% CI 0.55, 0.82 p&lt;0.001) in favor of patients on DOACs. In the subgroup analysis of previous anticoagulant use, the risk of bleeding was lower for DOACs compared to warfarin in both the experienced population (HR 0.70, 95%CI 0.51, 0.96) and the naïve population (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47,0.87). However, heterogeneity was moderate to high among both subgroups. Conclusion: This review and meta-analysis of observational studies including over 2.3 million patients showed that overall DOACs have a lower risk of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding compared to warfarin. Most importantly, although the pooled effect estimate did not differ between DTIs and FXa inhibitors, among patients receiving FXa inhibitors there was a significant difference between individual agents. Patients on apixaban had a significantly lower risk of bleeding compared to warfarin in contrast to patients on rivaroxaban who had a similar risk. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals The Relationship Between Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy and Survival in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenyan Fang ◽  
Yingli Zhang ◽  
Lingqin Zhao ◽  
Xi Chen ◽  
Liang Xia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy has been widely used in the surgical treatment of advanced ovarian cancer patients. Nevertheless, the corresponding therapeutic may not provide a survival benefit. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in such patients. Methods Patients with advanced ovarian cancer (stage III-IV, according to the classification presented by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) who were admitted and treated in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from January 2004 to December 2013 were enrolled and reviewed retrospectively. All patients were optimally or suboptimally debulked (absent or residual tumor <1 cm) and divided into two groups. Group A (no-lymphadenectomy group, n =170): patients did not undergo lymph node resection; lymph nodes resection or biopsy were selective. Group B (n=240): patients underwent systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Results A total of 410 eligible patients were enrolled in the study. The patients’ median age was 51 years old (range, 28–72 years old). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 78% and 24% in the no-lymphadenectomy group and 76% and 26% in the lymphadenectomy group (P=0.385 and 0.214, respectively). Subsequently, there was no significant difference in 5-year OS and 2-year PFS between the two groups stratified to histological types (serous type or non-serous type), the clinical evaluation of negative lymph nodes or with macroscopic peritoneal metastasis beyond pelvic (IIIB-IV). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy was not a significant factor influencing the patients’ survival. Patients in the lymphadenectomy group had a higher incidence of postoperative complications (incidence of infection treated with antibiotics was 21.7% vs. 12.9% [P=0.027]; incidence of lymph cysts was 20.8% vs. 2.4% [P < 0.001]). Conclusions Our study showed that systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy did not significantly improve survival of advanced ovarian cancer patients with residual tumor <1 cm or absent after cytoreductive surgery, and were associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications.

scholarly journals Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1238-1238
Author(s):  
Kamolyut Lapumnuaypol ◽  
Thita Chiasakul
Keyword(s):  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients

Abstract Introduction: The coagulopathy of cirrhosis is characterized by a complex rebalanced hemostasis which increases the risk of bleeding as well as thrombosis. For the treatment and prevention of thromboembolism, low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin, are generally used in cirrhotic patients. Although efficacious, these agents are inconvenient due to the parenteral route of administration, need for monitoring, and interactions with food or drugs. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may provide safe and effective alternatives for patients with cirrhosis. However, data concerning their safety profile in this population are limited given that patients with advanced liver diseases were excluded from most clinical trials. To address this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety of DOACs compared to warfarin or low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with cirrhosis. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception up to June 2018. We included prospective and retrospective studies involving adults ≥18 years with cirrhosis of any stage in whom anticoagulants were indicated for any indications. Included studies are required to report the incidence, odds ratio, or hazard ratio of bleeding events in both patients receiving DOACs and patients receiving warfarin or LMWH (controls). Two authors independently searched the literature, screened for eligibility, and extracted the data. Any discrepancies were resolved by reaching consensus. Primary outcome of interest was all-cause bleeding events. Secondary outcome was major bleeding. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.3. For all-cause bleeding, pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Mantel-Haenszel method. For major bleeding, effect estimates and standard errors from individual studies were combined by the generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird. Random-effects model was used in all analyses. Inter-study heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's Q test and I2statistics. Results: A total of 279 articles were identified from MEDLINE and EMBASE, of which 93 were removed because of duplication. After screening by title and abstract, 174 articles were excluded. Full text of 12 articles were reviewed, of which 5 studies (4 observational studies and 1 randomized controlled trial) with a total of 447 patients met eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis. The indications for anticoagulants included atrial fibrillation, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and portal vein thrombosis. The DOACs used in these studies included dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban. Heterogeneity among studies was low to moderate. Compared to controls, the use of DOACs in cirrhotic patients did not show any significant difference in all-cause bleeding (RR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.32-1.63; I2=59%, Figure 1). Among 3 studies that reported major bleeding, there was no significant difference in major bleeding between both groups (OR 0.46; 95% CI, 0.10-2.09; I2=42%, Figure 2). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that, compared to those who were treated with traditional anticoagulants, cirrhotic patients who were treated with DOACs had no significant increase risk of all-cause bleeding and major bleeding. The use of DOACs in patents with cirrhosis appears to be as safe as traditional anticoagulants. Further randomized controlled studies involving larger numbers of patients are required to explore the efficacy as well as potential beneficial effects of DOACs for each indications in cirrhotic patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals The Relationship Between Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy and Survival in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenyan Fang ◽  
Yingli Zhang ◽  
Lingqin Zhao ◽  
Xi Chen ◽  
Liang Xia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy has been widely used in the surgical treatment of advanced ovarian cancer patients. Nevertheless, the corresponding therapeutic may not provide a survival benefit. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in such patients. Methods Patients with advanced ovarian cancer (stage III-IV, according to the classification presented by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) who were admitted and treated in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from January 2004 to December 2013 were enrolled and reviewed retrospectively. All patients were optimally or suboptimally debulked (absent or residual tumor <1 cm) and divided into two groups. Group A (no-lymphadenectomy group, n =170): patients did not undergo lymph node resection; lymph nodes resection or biopsy were selective. Group B (n=240): patients underwent systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Results A total of 410 eligible patients were enrolled in the study. The patients’ median age was 51 years old (range, 28–72 years old). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 78% and 24% in the no-lymphadenectomy group and 76% and 26% in the lymphadenectomy group (P=0.385 and 0.214, respectively). Subsequently, there was no significant difference in 5-year OS and 2-year PFS between the two groups stratified to histological types (serous type or non-serous type), the clinical evaluation of negative lymph nodes or with macroscopic peritoneal metastasis beyond pelvic (IIIB-IV). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy was not a significant factor influencing the patients’ survival. Patients in the lymphadenectomy group had a higher incidence of postoperative complications (incidence of infection treated with antibiotics was 21.7% vs. 12.9% [P=0.027]; incidence of lymph cysts was 20.8% vs. 2.4% [P < 0.001]). Conclusions Our study showed that systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy did not significantly improve survival in advanced ovarian cancer patients with residual tumor <1 cm or absent after cytoreductive surgery, and were associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications.

Clinical course of pulmonary embolism patients treated with DOACs: comparing prognosis, recurrent thromboembolism, and major bleeding between patients with and without cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Nakano ◽  
R Imai ◽  
M Yoshida ◽  
S Shimokata ◽  
S Adachi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Clinical Course ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Recurrent Vte

Abstract Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the third frequent acute cardiovascular syndrome in the Europe and Japan. Since direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used now, the morbidity and mortality of pulmonary embolism (PE) patients especially associated with cancer needs to be re-evaluated. Purpose We evaluated the clinical course of patients with PE mainly treated with DOACs. Methods This retrospective observational study was conducted in a single center. The data were collected from the medical record of consecutive patients who received inpatient treatment of PE. In this study, we have compared PE patients with cancer (cancer PE) to those without cancer (non-cancer PE) and evaluated the mortality, recurrent of VTE and major bleedings. Results In total, 140 patients were enrolled: 94 patients were cancer-related, and 46 patients were without cancer (Table). The type of the tumor in cancer PE patients were as follows: gastric 8 (9%), esophageal 5 (5%), pancreatic 12 (13%), lung 14 (15%), lymphoma 2 (2%), gynecologic 17 (18%), renal 2 (2%), bile duct 8 (9%), colon 12 (13%), and others 17 (18%). Kaplan-Meier curve showed that the cumulative all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the cancer PE group (35/94 (37%) vs. 2/46 (4%), P&lt;0.001 (log rank), HR 10.3 [95% CI:2.5–43.3]). The cumulative incidence of recurrent VTE was significantly higher in the cancer PE group (7/94 (7%) vs. 0/46, P=0.03 (log rank)). There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of major bleeding between the cancer PE group and the non-cancer PE group (8/94 (9%) vs. 5/46 (11%)). Conclusions The risk of recurrent VTE was still higher in cancer PE patients compared to non-cancer PE patients, although DOACs were used. Meanwhile the incidence of major bleeding was comparable in both groups, the risk of bleeding might be acceptable with using DOACs especially in cancer PE patients. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Factor Xa Inhibitors in Patients after Bariatric Surgery

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2439-2439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margarita Kushnir ◽  
Radhika Gali ◽  
Mariam Alexander ◽  
Henny Heisler H. Billett
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Recurrent Vte ◽  
Post Bariatric Surgery

Background: Over 200,000 people underwent weight loss surgery in the United States in 2017. The absorption of numerous drugs has been shown to be altered in patients after bariatric procedures, as gastrointestinal absorptive surface, food volume, and gastric pH all affect bioavailability. Dosing of warfarin, which is commonly used for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), often needs to be adjusted, based on INR, after bariatric surgery. Since direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which are rapidly replacing warfarin as standard anticoagulant therapy, are not monitored, there is concern regarding their efficacy and safety in patients who have had bariatric surgery, particularly rivaroxaban, which is absorbed primarily in the stomach and must be taken with food at therapeutic doses. One study found that 9 out of 9 apixaban patients (but only 2 of 7 rivaroxaban patients) had levels that fell within the expected range after bariatric surgery. Effects of bariatric surgery on DOACs may be further complicated by baseline obesity and subsequent weight loss of the patients. The goal of our current study is to determine whether DOACs are safe and effective in preventing recurrent VTE in patients who have undergone bariatric surgery. Methods: Using our institutional database, we identified all adult patients (age ≥18 years) with a history of bariatric surgery (gastric banding, sleeve gastrectomy, and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass) who were started on anticoagulation with apixaban or rivaroxaban for VTE, between July 1, 2013 and June 30, 2018. We performed retrospective chart review to obtain information on patient demographics, BMI and type of bariatric surgery. We documented clinical outcomes of recurrent VTE and bleeding from the first prescription date to the earliest of a thrombotic event, discontinuation of medication, death, or the end of study period, June 30, 2018. VTE events were confirmed by a review of imaging studies (compression ultrasonography, ventilation/perfusions scans, and CT scans). Bleeding events were included if they met criteria for clinically relevant non-major bleeding and/or major bleeding according to the Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Safety outcomes included major bleeding (MB) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB). We also compared VTE recurrence and bleeding rates between the post-bariatric surgery patients and patients with BMI >40 from our prior study. Chi- squared tests were used to assess statistical significance of the differences in recurrent VTE and bleeding rates between anticoagulant cohorts. Results: Data on 102 patients were collected: 42 patients on apixaban and 60 patients on rivaroxaban. Our population was predominantly female (82.4%) with a mean age of 48.5 years and a median BMI of 35.7 at initiation of anticoagulation. Gastric bypass was the most common bariatric procedure (51%), followed by sleeve gastrectomy (37.3%), and gastric banding (11.8%). There were no recurrent VTE events in the apixaban cohort with a median follow-up duration of 137 days. Among patients on rivaroxaban, with a median follow-up of 232 days, there was one recurrent VTE (1.7%) in a patient with a BMI of 54 at the time of event. When we compared VTE recurrence rates of our combined DOAC cohort (apixaban + rivaroxaban) between our general morbidly obese population, from a prior study at our institution, and post-bariatric surgery patients, there was no statistically significant difference (2.0% vs. 1.0%, respectively, p=0.5). In bariatric surgery patients, one CRNMB event was recorded in apixaban group (2.4%) while 4 major bleeding events occurred on rivaroxaban (6.7%), p=0.3. There was no significant difference in the rate of composite MB and CRNMB between the general obesity and bariatric surgery patients (8.0% vs. 4.9%, respectively, p=0.3). Conclusions: In a review of post-bariatric surgery patients on anticoagulation for VTE, we found low rates of recurrent VTE for patients on DOACs. Although we had a relatively small sample size, the incidence of VTE recurrence was not higher in this cohort than was found in our previously published study of general obesity population. Prospective studies are needed to further investigate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in patients after bariatric surgery. Table. Disclosures Kushnir: Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Billett:Janssen: Research Funding.

Patterns of anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in cancer patients referred for cardio-oncological evaluation

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Toma ◽  
E Rrapaj ◽  
S Giovinazzo ◽  
M Sarocchi ◽  
G Stronati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Creatinine Concentration ◽  
Pharmacological Interactions ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are the standard of care for the prophylaxis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF)-cardioembolism, but their use in oncological patients has been limited so far. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of the patients referred to two cardio-oncology outpatient units between January 2017 and July 2019, and selected those presenting with NVAF, CHA2DS2-VASc ≥1 for men and ≥2 for women, and cancer on active treatment. The following were considered as contraindications to DOAC: severe chronic kidney disease; anti-neoplastic therapy unknown or with potential moderate-to-severe adverse interactions; cirrhosis or liver metastases. Clinical characteristics of patients on DOAC (group 1), on VKA or LMWH with at least 1 contraindication to DOAC (group 2), and on VKA or LMWH despite not having contraindications to DOAC (group 3) were compared by chi-square or ANOVA. Results Of a total of 3,831 patients, 264 (6.9%) met the inclusion criteria (Figure 1). One-hundred fourteen (43.2%) were in group 1, 61 (23.1%) in group 2 (18 on VKA, 43 on LMWH), and 65 (24.6%) in group 3 (27 on VKA, 38 on LMWH). Anticoagulation was omitted in 24 (9.1%) cases for various reasons: spontaneous bleeding (5), anaemia and/or thrombocytopenia (5), frailty (4), CHA2DS2-VASc 1 (3), pharmacological interactions (1), single episode of NVAF (1); and not clearly motivated in 5 subjects. The only significant difference between the 3 groups was serum creatinine concentration (Table 1). Of note, only 10% of subjects in group 1 received an inappropriate DOAC dose, while LMWH was under-dosed for 18% of patients in group 2 and 31% of patients in group 3 (P=0.002). Conclusions In the setting of a dedicated cardio-oncology consultation, DOAC and VKA are most often appropriately prescribed to cancer patients with NVAF. However, there is residual use of LMWH, not infrequently at non-anticoagulant dosage. This is a non-evidence based common practice in clinical oncology that clearly must be abandoned Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Low Molecular Weight Heparin in the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Thromboembolism: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trails

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4962-4962
Author(s):  
Sariya Wongsaengsak ◽  
Somedeb Ball ◽  
Nuvneet Khandelwal ◽  
Alay Tikue ◽  
Arunee Motes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Recurrent Vte

Introduction: Cancer patients have approximately 4 times higher risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared to the general population. High tendency of bleeding from anticoagulant use in this population makes the treatment of cancer-associated thromboembolism (CAT) very challenging. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is still considered as standard treatment for CAT. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have emerged as a potential alternative for LMWH due to the ease of administration and predictable pharmacokinetics, but data on DOACs in CAT is limited. Few randomized controlled trials (RCT) published recently have compared the efficacy and safety of DOACs with LMWH in the treatment of CAT. Hence, we conducted an updated meta-analysis of RCTs to determine the relative risk of recurrent VTE and bleeding complications associated with DOACs compared to LMWH in the treatment of thromboembolism in patients with cancer, and to evaluate if the risk estimates have changed since prior report (Li et al.). Methods: We performed a systemic search using Embase, Medline, and the meeting abstracts with appropriate keywords through 06/30/19, to find all RCTs comparing a DOAC with LMWH in treatment of patients with CAT. The search strategy, study selection, data extraction and analysis were performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We pooled the point estimates in form of risk ratios (RR) with respective 95% confidence intervals (CI), using the random effects model (Mantel-Haenszel method) of Der Simonian and Laird. Heterogeneity of effect size across studies was quantified using I2 statistic and Cochran's Q. Publication bias was assessed by the Egger's regression test. All the statistical analyses were performed with the RevMan 5.3 software. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, the Cochrane Collaboration, 2014. Results: Overall a total of 1,739 patients with CAT (870 in the DOAC arms and 869 in LMWH arms) from three RCTs were included in the final analysis. Characteristics of studies included in the analysis are summarized in table 1. Different DOACs (Select-D: rivaroxaban, Hokusai VTE cancer: edoxaban and ADAM VTE: apixaban) were used to compare with dalteparin in included trials. Duration of anticoagulation was 6 to 12 months in these studies. Use of DOAC was associated with a significantly lower risk of recurrent VTE in comparison with LMWH [pooled RR 0.48, 95%CI: 0.26-0.87, p = 0.02, I2 = 56%, figure 1]. In addition, there was no statistically significant increase in the risk of major bleeding in patients on the DOAC arms, as compared to those on LMWH arms [ pooled RR 1.55 ,95%CI: 0.79-3.04, p = 0.20, I2 = 29%, figure 2]. Criteria for major bleeding in the studies were defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis. The pooled RR for clinically relevant non major bleeding (CRNMB) was 1.80 [95%CI: 0.96-3.38, p = 0.07, I2 = 60%, figure 3], thus suggesting no significant difference in risk of CRNMB between DOAC and LMWH groups. Moderate heterogeneity was noted across trials. We found no publication bias among studies included in the analysis. Conclusion: In our meta-analysis, use of DOACs for the treatment of CAT was associated with a significantly decreased risk of recurrent VTE compared to LMWH. There was no significant difference in the incidence of major or non-major bleeding events between DOAC and LMWH groups. These study results provide additional evidence for potential use of DOAC as a safe and effective alternative to LMWH for the treatment of thromboembolism in patients with cancer. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document