LEAP-005: A phase II multicohort study of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated selected solid tumors—Results from the colorectal cancer cohort.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 94-94
Author(s):  
Carlos Gomez-Roca ◽  
Eduardo Yanez ◽  
Seock-Ah Im ◽  
Eduardo Castanon Alvarez ◽  
Helene Senellart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Tumor Imaging ◽  
Tissue Sample ◽  
Final Visit ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

94 Background: Pembrolizumab (pembro), an anti-PD-1 antibody, is approved for the treatment of patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair (MMR) deficient colorectal cancer, both as first-line treatment and after progression following treatment with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. The combination of lenvatinib, a multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and anti-PD-1 treatment showed synergistic antitumor activity in preclinical models. LEAP-005 (NCT03797326) is evaluating the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembro in pts with previously treated advanced solid tumors. We present findings from the colorectal cancer cohort. Methods: In this nonrandomized, open-label, phase 2 study, adult pts (aged ≥18 y) with histologically/cytologically documented metastatic and/or unresectable colorectal cancer, non–MSI-H/pMMR tumor per local determination, previous treatment with oxaliplatin and irinotecan in separate lines of therapy, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, ECOG PS of 0‒1, and a tissue sample evaluable for PD-L1 expression were eligible. Pts received lenvatinib 20 mg QD plus pembro 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles of pembro (~2 y) or until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Treatment with lenvatinib could continue beyond 2 y in pts with clinical benefit. Primary endpoints were ORR (per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review) and safety. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), PFS, and OS. Tumor imaging was performed Q9W from treatment initiation for 54 wks, then Q12W to week 102, and Q24W thereafter. Results: 32 pts with colorectal cancer received treatment with lenvatinib plus pembro (median age, 56 y [range, 36-77]; male, 81%; 3L, 91%); median time from first dose to data cutoff (April 10, 2020) was 10.6 mos (range, 5.9-13.1) ORR was 22% (95% CI, 9-40; Table). Grade 3-5 treatment-related AEs occurred in 16 (50%) pts. Treatment-related AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 pts (grade 2 ischemic stroke [n = 1], grade 3 increased liver transaminases [n = 1], grade 5 intestinal perforation [n = 1]). Efficacy Results. Clinical trial information: NCT03797326. NR, not reached aConfirmation was not required for best overall response of SD, but a final visit response of SD or better must have occurred ≥6 wks after starting study treatment Conclusions: In pts with previously treated advanced non–MSI-H/pMMR colorectal cancer, lenvatinib plus pembro demonstrated promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile. Enrollment in the colorectal cohort was expanded to 100 pts. [Table: see text]

LEAP-005: A phase 2 multicohort study of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated selected solid tumors—Results from the colorectal cancer cohort.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3564-3564
Author(s):  
Carlos A. Gomez-Roca ◽  
Eduardo Yanez ◽  
Seock-Ah Im ◽  
Eduardo Castanon Alvarez ◽  
Hélène Senellart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Tumor Imaging ◽  
Tissue Sample ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

3564 Background: Pembrolizumab (pembro), an anti-PD-1 antibody, is approved for the treatment of patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair (MMR) deficient colorectal cancer, both as first-line treatment and after progression following treatment with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. The combination of lenvatinib, a multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and anti-PD-1 treatment showed synergistic antitumor activity in preclinical models. LEAP-005 (NCT03797326) is evaluating the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembro in pts with previously treated advanced solid tumors. We present findings from the colorectal cancer cohort. Methods: In this nonrandomized, open-label, phase 2 study, adult pts (aged ≥18 y) with histologically/cytologically documented metastatic and/or unresectable colorectal cancer, non–MSI-H/pMMR tumor per local determination, previous treatment with oxaliplatin and irinotecan in separate lines of therapy, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, ECOG PS of 0‒1, and a tissue sample evaluable for PD-L1 expression were eligible. Pts received lenvatinib 20 mg QD plus pembro 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles of pembro (̃2 y) or until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Treatment with lenvatinib could continue beyond 2 y in pts with clinical benefit. Primary endpoints were ORR (per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review) and safety. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), PFS, and OS. Tumor imaging was performed Q9W from treatment initiation for 54 wks, then Q12W to week 102, and Q24W thereafter. Results: 32 pts with colorectal cancer received treatment with lenvatinib plus pembro (median age, 56 y [range, 36-77]; male, 81%; 3L, 91%); median time from first dose to data cutoff (April 10, 2020) was 10.6 mo (range, 5.9-13.1). ORR was 22% (95% CI, 9–40; table). Grade 3–5 treatment-related AEs occurred in 16 (50%) pts. Treatment-related AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 pts (grade 2 ischemic stroke [n = 1], grade 3 increased liver transaminases [n = 1], grade 5 intestinal perforation [n = 1]). Conclusions: In pts with previously treated advanced non–MSI-H/pMMR colorectal cancer, lenvatinib plus pembro demonstrated promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile. Enrollment in the colorectal cohort was expanded to 100 pts. Clinical trial information: NCT03797326. [Table: see text]

LEAP-005: A phase 2 multicohort study of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated selected solid tumors—Results from the gastric cancer cohort.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4030-4030
Author(s):  
Hyun Cheol Cheol Chung ◽  
Zarnie Lwin ◽  
Carlos A. Gomez-Roca ◽  
Federico Longo ◽  
Eduardo Yanez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Tumor Imaging ◽  
Tissue Sample ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Previously Treated

4030 Background: Lenvatinib, an anti-angiogenic multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with the anti‒PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab, has demonstrated promising antitumor activity with manageable safety in the first- or second-line in a phase 2 trial of patients with advanced gastric cancer. LEAP-005 (NCT03797326) is a phase 2, multicohort, nonrandomized, open-label study evaluating efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors; here, we present findings from the gastric cancer cohort of LEAP-005. Methods: Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic and/or unresectable gastric cancer, received at least 2 prior lines of therapy, had measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, ECOG PS of 0‒1, and provided a tissue sample evaluable for PD-L1 expression. Patients received lenvatinib 20 mg once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles of pembrolizumab (approximately 2 years) or until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Treatment with lenvatinib could continue beyond 2 years in patients experiencing clinical benefit. Primary endpoints were ORR (per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review) and safety. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR; comprising CR, PR, and SD), duration of response (DOR), PFS, and OS. Tumor imaging was performed Q9W from treatment initiation for 54 weeks, then Q12W to week 102, and Q24W thereafter. Results: 31 patients were enrolled in the gastric cancer cohort; 87% were male, 58% were aged < 65 years, and 71% had PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1. Median time from first dose to data cutoff (April 10, 2020) was 7.0 months (range, 1.9‒11.9); 19 patients (61%) had discontinued treatment. ORR was 10% (95% CI, 2‒26); 1 patient had CR (3%), and 2 had a PR (6%). 12 patients (39%) had SD. Median DOR was not reached (range, 2.1+ to 2.3+ months). DCR was 48% (95% CI, 30‒67). Median PFS was 2.5 months (95% CI, 1.8‒4.2). Median OS was 5.9 months (95% CI, 2.6‒8.7). 28 patients (90%) had treatment-related AEs, including 13 patients (42%) with grade 3‒5 AEs. 1 patient had a treatment-related AE that led to death (hemorrhage). 8 patients (26%) had immune-mediated AEs: hypothyroidism (n = 5), hyperthyroidism (n = 2), and pneumonitis (n = 1). There were no infusion-related reactions. Conclusions: In patients with advanced gastric cancer who received 2 prior lines of therapy, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile. Based on these data, enrollment in the gastric cancer cohort has been expanded to 100 patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03797326.

LEAP-005: A phase II multicohort study of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated selected solid tumors—Results from the gastric cancer cohort.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 230-230
Author(s):  
Hyun Cheol Chung ◽  
Zarnie Lwin ◽  
Carlos Gomez-Roca ◽  
Federico Longo ◽  
Eduardo Yanez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Tumor Imaging ◽  
Tissue Sample ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Previously Treated

230 Background: Lenvatinib, an anti-angiogenic multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with the anti‒PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab, has demonstrated promising antitumor activity with manageable safety in the first- or second-line in a phase 2 trial of patients with advanced gastric cancer. LEAP-005 (NCT03797326) is a phase 2, multicohort, nonrandomized, open-label study evaluating efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors; here, we present findings from the gastric cancer cohort of LEAP-005. Methods: Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic and/or unresectable gastric cancer, received at least 2 prior lines of therapy, had measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, ECOG PS of 0‒1, and provided a tissue sample evaluable for PD-L1 expression. Patients received lenvatinib 20 mg once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles of pembrolizumab (approximately 2 years) or until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Treatment with lenvatinib could continue beyond 2 years in patients experiencing clinical benefit. Primary endpoints were ORR (per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review) and safety. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR; comprising CR, PR, and SD), duration of response (DOR), PFS, and OS. Tumor imaging was performed Q9W from treatment initiation for 54 weeks, then Q12W to week 102, and Q24W thereafter. Results: 31 patients were enrolled in the gastric cancer cohort; 87% were male, 58% were aged < 65 years, and 71% had PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1. Median time from first dose to data cutoff (April 10, 2020) was 7.0 months (range, 1.9‒11.9); 19 patients (61%) had discontinued treatment. ORR was 10% (95% CI, 2‒26); 1 patient had CR (3%), and 2 had a PR (6%). 12 patients (39%) had SD. Median DOR was not reached (range, 2.1+ to 2.3+ months). DCR was 48% (95% CI, 30‒67). Median PFS was 2.5 months (95% CI, 1.8‒4.2). Median OS was 5.9 months (95% CI, 2.6‒8.7). 28 patients (90%) had treatment-related AEs, including 13 patients (42%) with grade 3‒5 AEs. 1 patient had a treatment-related AE that led to death (hemorrhage). 8 patients (26%) had immune-mediated AEs: hypothyroidism (n = 5), hyperthyroidism (n = 2), and pneumonitis (n = 1). There were no infusion-related reactions. Conclusions: In patients with advanced gastric cancer who received 2 prior lines of therapy, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile. Based on these data, enrollment in the gastric cancer cohort has been expanded to 100 patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03797326.

A phase 1b, open-label, dose-escalation study to evaluate camidanlumab tesirine (Cami) as monotherapy in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2556-2556
Author(s):  
Igor Puzanov ◽  
Patricia LoRusso ◽  
Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos ◽  
Christopher T. Chen ◽  
Yvan LeBruchec ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Treatment Withdrawal ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3

2556 Background: Depletion of tumor-infiltrating CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs), which inhibit tumor-specific immune responses, could contribute to tumor eradication. Cami (ADCT-301), an anti-CD25, pyrrolobenzodiazepine-based antibody-drug conjugate, targets CD25+ Tregs. A mouse surrogate has shown potent antitumor activity in solid tumor models. Here we report preliminary data from the monotherapy arm of a phase 1b trial of Cami in pts with selected advanced solid tumors. Methods: The monotherapy dose-escalation part of this open-label study enrolled pts (aged ≥18 years) with selected advanced solid tumors and no suitable existing therapy. The primary objective was to characterize safety and tolerability, and to identify the recommended phase 2 dose of Cami monotherapy. Secondary and exploratory objectives included evaluation of preliminary antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity. Pts received Cami every 3 weeks (1 cycle) with dose escalation per a 3+3 design. Disease control rate (DCR) was assessed (complete and partial responses [CR, PR] and stable disease). Results: At data cut-off (Dec 17, 2020), 44 pts were enrolled, with primary tumor types (stage IVA/B: 27 pts; 61.4%) of colorectal (15 pts; 34.1%), pancreatic (14 pts; 31.8%), head and neck, ovarian/fallopian tube, and renal cell carcinoma (all 3 pts; 6.8%), non-small cell lung cancer (2 pts; 4.5%), gastric, esophageal/GEJ, melanoma, and triple-negative breast cancer (each 1 pt; 2.3%). Median (range) age was 60.5 (33–82) years; median (range) number of prior systemic therapies was 4 (1–9). Pts received a median (range) of 2 (1–6) Cami cycles at doses of 20–150 µg/kg. Median (range) treatment duration was 22 (1–178) days. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. All-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in ≥20% pts were nausea (18 pts; 40.9%), decreased appetite and fatigue (each 16 pts; 36.4%), constipation (13 pts; 29.5%), abdominal pain (11 pts; 25%), and rash (10 pts; 22.7%). The only Grade ≥3 TEAE in ≥10% pts was anemia (5 pts; 11.4%). Grade 3 autoimmune AEs (colitis, immune-mediated AE, systemic inflammatory response syndrome) and neurologic AEs (dysphagia and asthenia, but not GBS) were reported in 3 (6.8%) and 2 (4.5%) pts, respectively. 1 (2.3%) Cami-related TEAE led to treatment withdrawal; no Cami-related TEAEs were fatal. DCR was 25% (95% CI: 11.1, 34.7); 11/44 pts attained stable disease. No pts had CR or PR. Conclusions: Dose escalation of Cami monotherapy is complete. The safety profile is encouraging and MTD was not reached. PK/PD data will be presented. 150 µg/kg is the highest dose investigated for single-agent Cami and the highest to be investigated combined with pembrolizumab in selected advanced solid tumors in the current protocol. Funding: ADC Therapeutics SA NCT03621982. Clinical trial information: NCT03621982.

Pembrolizumab in microsatellite instability high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) cancers: Updated analysis from phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2565-2565
Author(s):  
Michele Maio ◽  
Paolo Antonio Ascierto ◽  
Ludmila Manzyuk ◽  
Daniel Motola-Kuba ◽  
Nicolas Penel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Tissue Sample ◽  
Guillain Barre Syndrome ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Contributing Factors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Guillain Barré Syndrome ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Guillain Barré

2565 Background: Approval of pembrolizumab for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors that have progressed on prior therapy was supported by data from KEYNOTE-158 (NCT02628067). At the data cutoff of Dec 6, 2018, the ORR was 34.3% among 233 patients (pts) with MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors enrolled in all cohorts of KEYNOTE-158, 77.6% had duration of response (DOR) ≥24 mo, median PFS was 4.1 mo, and median OS was 23.5 mo. We present results from 351 pts enrolled in KEYNOTE-158 cohort K at the data cutoff of Oct 5, 2020. Methods: Cohort K of this phase 2, open-label study enrolled adults with any previously treated advanced noncolorectal MSI-H solid tumor, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, and ECOG PS of 0–1. MSI-H/dMMR status was assessed locally from a tumor tissue sample and defined as ≥1 of 4 MMR proteins absent by immunohistochemistry or as ≥2 allelic loci size shifts of 5 microsatellite markers by PCR. Pts received pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles or until PD, unacceptable toxicity, investigator decision, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was ORR per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints were DOR and PFS per RECIST v1.1 by BICR, OS, and safety. Efficacy was assessed in all pts who received ≥1 dose of treatment with ≥6 mo follow-up; safety was assessed in all treated pts. Results: 351 pts were enrolled in KEYNOTE-158 cohort K across multiple tumor types, including endometrial (22.5%), gastric (14.5%), small intestine (7.4%), ovarian (7.1%), cholangiocarcinoma (6.3%), and pancreatic (6.3%). 41.0% had 1 prior line of therapy; 55.6% had ≥2 prior lines. Median time from first dose to database cutoff (Oct 5, 2020) was 37.5 (range, 0.2–55.6) mo; 16.0% were continuing treatment. The ORR among the 321 eligble pts was 30.8% (CR, 27; PR, 72); median DOR was 47.5 mo (Table). Treatment-related AEs occurred in 64.7% of pts (grade 3–5, 12.0%), led to discontinuation in 6.6%, and led to death in 3 pts (myocarditis, pneumonia, and Guillain-Barre syndrome). Immune-mediated AEs and infusion reactions occurred in 20.2% of pts (grade 3–4, 4.3%) and led to death in 2 pts with no other contributing factors (myocarditis [AE start, day 26; death, day 33] and Guillain-Barre syndrome [AE start, day 22; death, day 41]). Conclusions: Pembrolizumab demonstrated a high ORR (30.8%), durable clinical benefit, and a manageable safety profile in this heavily pretreated advanced MSI-H/dMMR noncolorectal pan-tumor population. Clinical trial information: NCT02628067. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Surufatinib Plus Toripalimab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase 1 Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanshuo Cao ◽  
Ming Lu ◽  
Yu Sun ◽  
Jifang Gong ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1 Trial ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BackgroundPreclinical studies have supported a potential synergistic antitumor activity between surufatinib and anti-programed death ligand-1 (PD-L1). We describe here the results of a single-arm, open-label phase 1 trial to evaluate the safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients with advanced solid tumors treated with surufatinib combined with toripalimab, an inhibitor of PD-L1.MethodsThis is an open-label, dose escalation and expansion study in patients with solid tumors who had failed standard therapies or had no effective treatment. In the dose escalation stage, 3 cohorts of patients were treated with surufatinib, at dose levels of 200, 250, or 300 mg once daily (QD) in combination with a fixed dose of toripalimab 240 mg, every 3 weeks (Q3W), to evaluate maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Additional patients were enrolled in the dose expansion phase to further assess the efficacy, safety, and PK profile.ResultsFrom April 1, 2019 to July 10, 2020, 31 patients were screened, of which 28 patients were enrolled. One patient in the 300 mg cohort experienced dose limited toxicity (DLT), a grade 3 hyperthyroidism. The top 3 most common treatment-related adverse events of ≥ grade 3 were transaminases increased (17.9%), hypertension (14.3%) and blood bilirubin increased (10.7%). No treatment-related death or treatment discontinuation was identified. The RP2D was determined to be surufatinib 250 mg QD plus toripalimab 240 mg Q3W. Overall objective response rate was 22.2% [95% confidential interval (CI) 8.6‒42.3], and disease control rate reached 81.5% (95% CI 61.9‒93.7). ConclusionsSurufatinib plus toripalimab was well-tolerated, with no unexpected safety signals, and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT03879057; Registered March 18, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03879057

Efficacy of HX008 in high microsatellite instability/mismatch repair–defificient (MSI-H/dMMR) solid tumors: Results from a multicenter phase II open-label study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2572-2572
Author(s):  
Jing Huang ◽  
Yan Song ◽  
Suxia Luo ◽  
Xianli Yin ◽  
Enxiao LI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Initial Response ◽  
Subsequent Treatment ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

2572 Background: The subsequent treatment choices are limited for the patients with advanced solid tumors who had failed the standard therapies. PD-1 blockade monotherapy demonstrated robust antitumor activity in patients with MSI-H/dMMR. The aim of this study is to identify the efficacy and safety of HX008, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors. Methods: Eligible patients were age ≥18 years with histologically/cytologically confirmed advanced MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors, who have failed at least one line of standard systemic therapy. MSI-H/dMMR status was assessed centrally. Patients received HX008 200 mg once every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. Radiologic imaging was performed 9 weeks after the first treatment, then every 6 weeks for the first year of therapy, and every 12 weeks thereafter. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST1.1. Results: One hundred patients were enrolled from October 2018 to December 2020, with a median age of 53 (range 20-74) years. All of the patients were ≥ second-line patients. The most common cancer types were colorectal cancer (N=74) and gastric cancer (N=10). Median follow-up is 8.97 (range 0.03-25.53) months at the time of data cutoff. Among 86 patients who had reached the initial response evaluation, there were 8 CR, 33 PR, 24 SD, 17 PD and 4 NE. ORR was 47.67% (95%CI 36.79%-58.73%), and DCR was 75.58% (95%CI 65.13%-84.20%). ORR and DCR for the 66 colorectal cancer patients were 50% (95%CI 37.43-62.57%) and 75.76% (95%CI 63.64-85.46%). Median PFS was not reached (95%CI 6.18-NR) for all enrolled patients, while the 6-month and 12-month PFS rates were 62.66% (95%CI 50.98%-72.31%) and 52.70% (95%CI 39.96%-63.94%), respectively. Median OS was not reached. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 77 patients (77%). Twelve patients (12%) had grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events and there were no grade 5 treatment-related adverse events. The grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events with incidence >1% included anemia (2%) and leukopenia (2%). Immune-related adverse events were observed in 15 patients (15%), including hypothyroidism in 9 patients (all were grade 1-2), and hepatitis, hyperglycemia, myocarditis, creatin kinase/creatin kinase MB increased, hypopigmentation of the vulva, rash, each in 1 patient. Conclusions: HX008 as a ≥second-line therapy showed promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with MSI-H/dMMR advanced solid tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT03704246.

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab for patients with previously treated biliary tract cancers in the multicohort phase II LEAP-005 study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 321-321
Author(s):  
Luis Villanueva ◽  
Zarnie Lwin ◽  
Hyun Cheol Chung ◽  
Carlos Gomez-Roca ◽  
Federico Longo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Tumor Imaging ◽  
Tissue Sample ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Biliary Tract Cancers ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Ecog Ps

321 Background: Second-line treatment options for patients with biliary tract cancers (BTC) are limited. Lenvatinib, an anti-angiogenic multikinase inhibitor, in combination with the programmed death-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab, has demonstrated promising antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile in patients with select advanced solid tumors. LEAP-005 (NCT03797326) is evaluating the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors; here we present results from the BTC cohort of LEAP-005. Methods: In this nonrandomized, open-label, phase II study, eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with histologically or cytologically documented advanced (metastatic and/or unresectable) BTC with disease progression after 1 prior line of therapy, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, ECOG PS of 0‒1, and tissue sample evaluable for PD-L1 expression. Patients received lenvatinib 20 mg once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles (approximately 2 years) or until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Treatment with lenvatinib could continue beyond 2 years in patients experiencing clinical benefit. Primary endpoints were ORR (per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review) and safety. Secondary endpoints were the disease control rate (DCR; comprising CR, PR, and SD), duration of response (DOR), PFS, and OS. Tumor imaging was performed Q9W from treatment initiation for 54 weeks, then Q12W to week 102, and Q24W thereafter. Results: 31 patients were enrolled in the BTC cohort (ECOG PS 1, 55%; 84% ex-US). As of April 10, 2020, median time from first dose to data cutoff (DCO) was 9.5 months (range, 3.1‒11.9), with 16 patients on treatment at DCO. There were 3 (10%) PRs and 18 (58%) SDs. ORR was 10% (95% CI, 2‒26), and DCR was 68% (95% CI, 49‒83). Median DOR was 5.3 months (range, 2.1+ to 6.2). Median PFS was 6.1 months (95% CI, 2.1‒6.4). Median OS was 8.6 months (95% CI, 5.6 to NR). Treatment-related AEs occurred in 30 patients (97%), including 15 (48%) who had grade 3‒4 AEs; there were no treatment-related deaths. 2 (6%) discontinued treatment due to treatment-related AEs (myocarditis, pyrexia; n = 1 each). The most frequent treatment-related AEs were hypertension (42%), dysphonia (39%), diarrhea (32%), fatigue (32%), and nausea (32%). 14 patients (45%) had immune-mediated AEs and 1 patient (3%) had an infusion-related reaction. Conclusions: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated encouraging efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with advanced BTC who had received 1 line of prior therapy. Based on these data, enrollment in the BTC cohort has been expanded to 100 patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03797326.

Phase II trial of surufatinib plus toripalimab for disease progression after first-line chemotherapy with platinum and fluoropyrimidine in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16040-e16040
Author(s):  
Lin Shen ◽  
Ming Lu ◽  
Zhendong Chen ◽  
Feng Ye ◽  
Yanqiao Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Efficacy Evaluation ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

e16040 Background: Surufatinib is a novel small-molecule kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFRs, FGFR and CSF-1R, simultaneous targeting of angiogenesis through VEGFRs/FGFR1 and modulating tumor immune microenvironment through CSF-1R may be a uniquely potent strategy to enhance antitumor activity. Toripalimab is a monoclonal humanized IgG4 PD-1 antibody. Encouraging efficacy of surufatinib plus toripalimab treating patients with advanced solid tumors was reported at 2020 AACR. This is an ongoing, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of surufatinib in combination with toripalimab in various solid tumors. Here we report the results of patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma who have failed first-line of systemic chemotherapy were enrolled. Surufatinib 250 mg once a day (QD) will be orally administrated and toripalimab 240 mg will be intravenously administered every 3 weeks. Primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Results: As of Dec 31, 2020, a total of 21 gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma patients were enrolled. The median age was 58 years old, and 81% of the patients were male. Median duration of treatment was 3 months (surufatinib, 3 months; toripalimab, 3 months). Among 15 patients with at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation, 2 patients achieved confirmed partial response (PR), with 3 additional unconfirmed PR. And there were 6 in stable disease (SD), 3 in progressive disease (PD) and one not evaluable per RECIST v1.1. There were 5 in PR, 7 in SD and 2 in PD per irRECIST, respectively. The confirmed and unconfirmed ORR were 13.3% (95% CI: 1.7%-40.5%) and 33.3% (95% CI: 11.8%-61.6%), respectively. The disease control rate (DCR) was 73.3% (95% CI: 44.9%-92.2%) per RECIST v1.1. Median PFS was 3.71 months (95% CI: 1.41-unknown). 14.3% (3/21) of patients had treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of ≥ Grade 3. The most common TRAEs of ≥ Grade 3 were herpes zoster (4.8%), lymphopenia (4.8%), lymphocyte count decreased (4.8%), white blood cell count decreased (4.8%), liver injury (4.8%) and anaemia (4.8%). 4.8% (1/21) of patients had serious TRAEs. One patient died due to unknown reasons. Conclusions: Surufatinib plus toripalimab appeared to show encouraging activity in advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma with manageable safety profile. Such combination could be a promising strategy for advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma in the future. Clinical trial information: NCT04169672.

A phase I dose escalation trial of the VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, PTK787/ ZK222584 (PTK/ZK), used in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors with pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14012-14012
Author(s):  
S. R. Malireddy ◽  
E. Chiorean ◽  
A. Foster ◽  
D. Jones ◽  
M. Waddell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Weekly Paclitaxel ◽  
Transaminase Elevation ◽  
Liver Transaminase ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

14012 Background: The aim of this study was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for weekly paclitaxel administered in combination with daily PTK/ZK and assess for a potential PK drug interaction. Methods: 17 patients (pts) with refractory metastatic solid tumors, were enrolled. During cycle 1 (C1) paclitaxel was given on days 1 and 15 in combination with PTK/ZK on days 3 to 28. PTK/ZK was administered once daily each night. During cycle 2 (C2) and beyond, paclitaxel was given on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days. PTK/ZK was taken orally each night. A “3+3” design was used. In addition to the standard definitions of dose limiting toxicity (DLT) occurring in C1 and C2, the inability to give day 8 or 15 of paclitaxel or > 7 days of missed PTK/ZK due to toxicity was also deemed dose limiting. Therapy was given until disease progression. Results: 60 cycles (range: 1 to 8) have been administered to 16 evaluable pts. No DLTs were observed when 75 mg/m2 of paclitaxel was combined with PTK/ZK doses of 250 mg, 500 mg and 750 mg. Two of 5 pts treated with paclitaxel 85 mg/m2 and PTK/ZK 1,000 mg had Grade 3 transaminase elevation (defined DLT) in C1 after day 15. The MTD was therefore 75 mg/m2 paclitaxel and 750 mg PTK/ZK. Paclitaxel PK was obtained in 14 patients: 13 of 14 patients had a faster clearance (L/hr) of paclitaxel on C1 day 15 versus day 1 (average % increase: 79%, range 14–256%, SD: 69). Only one patient had a slower clearance: 26% decrease. Activity included 2 partial responses (prostate and esophageal cancer), and 8 pts had stable disease lasting 2–9+ months, including ovarian cancer pts previously treated with paclitaxel. Conclusion: The MTD for weekly paclitaxel plus daily PTK/ZK is 75 mg/m2 and 750 mg. DLTs were liver transaminase elevation. This combination was well tolerated, and responses and prolonged disease stabilization were seen. PK analysis revealed an increase in rate of paclitaxel clearance in most patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document