scholarly journals Non-BRCA1/2 Variants Detected in a High-Risk Chilean Cohort With a History of Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Adaniel ◽  
Francisca Salinas ◽  
Juan Manuel Donaire ◽  
Maria Eugenia Bravo ◽  
Octavio Peralta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Genetic Predisposition ◽  
Cancer Syndrome ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Cancer Program ◽  
Genetic Test Results

PURPOSE Little is known about the genetic predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer among the Chilean population, in particular genetic predisposition beyond BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. In the current study, we aim to describe the germline variants detected in individuals who were referred to a hereditary cancer program in Santiago, Chile. METHODS Data were retrospectively collected from the registry of the High-Risk Breast and Ovarian Cancer Program at Clínica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile. Data captured included index case diagnosis, ancestry, family history, and genetic test results. RESULTS Three hundred fifteen individuals underwent genetic testing during the study period. The frequency of germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in a breast or ovarian cancer predisposition gene was 20.3%. Of those patients who underwent testing with a panel of both high- and moderate-penetrance genes, 10.5% were found to have pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in non- BRCA1/2 genes. CONCLUSION Testing for non- BRCA1 and -2 mutations may be clinically relevant for individuals who are suspected to have a hereditary breast or ovarian cancer syndrome in Chile. Comprehensive genetic testing of individuals who are at high risk is necessary to further characterize the genetic susceptibility to cancer in Chile.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome: Reflection on the Creighton University Historical Series of High Risk Families

2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga M. Sinilnikova ◽  
Sylvie Mazoyer ◽  
Colette Bonnardel ◽  
Henry T. Lynch ◽  
Steven A. Narod ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Syndrome ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Historical Series ◽  
Brca2 Mutations ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 Mutations ◽  
High Risk Families

scholarly journals Comprehensive Analysis of Germline Variants in Mexican Patients with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility

Cancers ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalía Quezada Urban ◽  
Clara Díaz Velásquez ◽  
Rina Gitler ◽  
María Rojo Castillo ◽  
Max Sirota Toporek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Cancer Genes ◽  
Cancer Syndrome ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Recurrent Mutations

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC) represents 5–10% of all patients with breast cancer and is associated with high-risk pathogenic alleles in BRCA1/2 genes, but only for 25% of cases. We aimed to find new pathogenic alleles in a panel of 143 cancer-predisposing genes in 300 Mexican cancer patients with suspicion of HBOC and 27 high-risk patients with a severe family history of cancer, using massive parallel sequencing. We found pathogenic variants in 23 genes, including BRCA1/2. In the group of cancer patients 15% (46/300) had a pathogenic variant; 11% (33/300) harbored variants with unknown clinical significance (VUS) and 74% (221/300) were negative. The high-risk group had 22% (6/27) of patients with pathogenic variants, 4% (1/27) had VUS and 74% (20/27) were negative. The most recurrent mutations were the Mexican founder deletion of exons 9-12 and the variant p.G228fs in BRCA1, each found in 5 of 17 patients with alterations in this gene. Rare VUS with potential impact at the protein level were found in 21 genes. Our results show for the first time in the Mexican population a higher contribution of pathogenic alleles in other susceptibility cancer genes (54%) than in BRCA1/2 (46%), highlighting the high locus heterogeneity of HBOC and the necessity of expanding genetic tests for this disease to include broader gene panels.

scholarly journals Genetic Testing and Results in a Population-Based Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients and Ovarian Cancer Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15) ◽  
pp. 1305-1315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison W. Kurian ◽  
Kevin C. Ward ◽  
Nadia Howlader ◽  
Dennis Deapen ◽  
Ann S. Hamilton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Genetic Test Results

PURPOSE Genetic testing for cancer risk has expanded rapidly. We examined clinical genetic testing and results among population-based patients with breast and ovarian cancer. METHODS The study included all women 20 years of age or older diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer in California and Georgia between 2013 and 2014 and reported to the SEER registries covering the entire state populations. SEER data were linked to results from four laboratories that performed nearly all germline cancer genetic testing. Testing use and results were analyzed at the gene level. RESULTS There were 77,085 patients with breast cancer and 6,001 with ovarian cancer. Nearly one quarter of those with breast cancer (24.1%) and one third of those with ovarian cancer (30.9%) had genetic test results. Among patients with ovarian cancer, testing was lower in blacks (21.6%; 95% CI, 18.1% to 25.4%; v whites, 33.8%; 95% CI, 32.3% to 35.3%) and uninsured patients (20.8%; 95% CI, 15.5% to 26.9%; v insured patients, 35.3%; 95% CI, 33.8% to 36.9%). Prevalent pathogenic variants in patients with breast cancer were BRCA1 (3.2%), BRCA2 (3.1%), CHEK 2 (1.6%), PALB2 (1.0%), ATM (0.7%), and NBN (0.4%); in patients with ovarian cancer, prevalent pathogenic variants were BRCA1 (8.7%), BRCA2 (5.8%), CHEK2 (1.4%), BRIP1 (0.9%), MSH2 (0.8%), and ATM (0.6%). Racial/ethnic differences in pathogenic variants included BRCA1 (ovarian cancer: whites, 7.2%; 95% CI, 5.9% to 8.8%; v Hispanics, 16.1%; 95% CI, 11.8% to 21.2%) and CHEK2 (breast cancer: whites, 2.3%; 95% CI, 1.8% to 2.8%; v blacks, 0.1%; 95% CI, 0% to 0.8%). When tested for all genes that current guidelines designate as associated with their cancer type, 7.8% of patients with breast cancer and 14.5% of patients with ovarian cancer had pathogenic variants. CONCLUSION Clinically-tested patients with breast and ovarian cancer in two large, diverse states had 8% to 15% prevalence of actionable pathogenic variants. Substantial testing gaps and disparities among patients with ovarian cancer are targets for improvement.

scholarly journals Recommended Extension of Indication Criteria for Genetic Testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. S9-S13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lenka Foretová ◽  
Eva Macháčková ◽  
Markéta Palácová ◽  
Marie Navrátilová ◽  
Marek Svoboda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Cancer Syndrome ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Brca2 Mutations ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 Mutations

scholarly journals Genetic testing in Poland and Ukraine: should comprehensive germline testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 be recommended for women with breast and ovarian cancer?

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tu Nguyen-Dumont ◽  
Pawel Karpinski ◽  
Maria M. Sasiadek ◽  
Hayane Akopyan ◽  
Jason A. Steen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Founder Mutation ◽  
Targeted Sequencing ◽  
Founder Mutations ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Prior Testing ◽  
Variant Frequency

Abstract Purpose To characterize the spectrum of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic germline variants in women from south-west Poland and west Ukraine affected with breast or ovarian cancer. Testing in women at high risk of breast and ovarian cancer in these regions is currently mainly limited to founder mutations. Methods Unrelated women affected with breast and/or ovarian cancer from Poland (n = 337) and Ukraine (n = 123) were screened by targeted sequencing. Excluded from targeted sequencing were 34 Polish women who had previously been identified as carrying a founder mutation in BRCA1. No prior testing had been conducted among the Ukrainian women. Thus, this study screened BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the germline DNA of 426 women in total. Results We identified 31 and 18 women as carriers of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) genetic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively. We observed five BRCA1 and eight BRCA2 P/LP variants (13/337, 3.9%) in the Polish women. Combined with the 34/337 (10.1%) founder variants identified prior to this study, the overall P/LP variant frequency in the Polish women was thus 14% (47/337). Among the Ukrainian women, 16/123 (13%) women were identified as carrying a founder mutation and 20/123 (16.3%) were found to carry non-founder P/LP variants (10 in BRCA1 and 10 in BRCA2). Conclusions These results indicate that genetic testing in women at high risk of breast and ovarian cancer in Poland and Ukraine should not be limited to founder mutations. Extended testing will enhance risk stratification and management for these women and their families.

Increased risk of cervical cancer in high-risk families with and without mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5588-5588 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Rhiem ◽  
C. Fischer ◽  
K. Bosse ◽  
B. Wappenschmidt ◽  
R. K. Schmutzler
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Registries ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Mutation Carriers ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
High Risk Families

5588 Background: In BRCA germline mutation carriers increased risks for cancer at other sites than breast and ovary have been reported. Methods: To evaluate the risk of BRCA-associated cancers, we conducted a cross-section analysis in 4405 individuals from 409 families with BRCA1 (n=86) or BRCA2 mutations (n=53) and 270 high risk BRCA1/2 negative families ascertained by the Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Center Cologne. We considered proven mutation carriers, individuals affected by breast and ovarian cancer and their first degree relatives and identified 921 individuals from BRCA1 (604 female; 317 male), 571 from BRCA2 (365 female; 206 male) and 2913 from BRCA1/2 negative (1938 female; 975 male) families that suffered from 677 cancers other than breast and ovarian cancers. Relative risks (RR) of the study group compared to the general population were evaluated by the standardized incidence ratio (SIR), using data from two German Cancer Registries. Results: The risk for cervical cancer is significantly increased in women from BRCA1 and BRCA2 positive (RR=4.59, 95% CI=2.20 to 8.44, and RR=3.69, 95% CI=1.20 to 8.61; p=<0.001) and from BRCA1/2 negative families (RR=2.97, 95% CI=1.88 to 4.45). Moreover, the risk for pancreatic cancer in women from BRCA2 positive and BRCA1/2 negative families as well as the risk for prostate cancer in men from BRCA2 positive families is increased (RR=5.10, 95% CI=1.65 to 11.90; RR=1.98, 95% CI=1.02 to 3.46; RR=2.09; 95% CI=1.00 to 3.84). Conclusions: We here report an increased risk of cervical cancer for women from BRCA1 and BRCA2 positive and from BRCA1/2 negative high risk families, respectively. These results are in line with other studies in BRCA1 and 2 positive individuals and should be considered in the clinical risk management of these individuals. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document