Different Associations Between Inpatient or Outpatient Palliative Care and End-of-Life Outcomes for Hospitalized Patients With Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan C. Yeh ◽  
Arielle R. Urman ◽  
Robert J. Besaw ◽  
Laura E. Dodge ◽  
Kathleen A. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Advance Care

PURPOSE Palliative care (PC) improves outcomes in advanced cancer, and guidelines recommend early outpatient referral. However, many PC teams see more inpatient than outpatient consults. We conducted a retrospective study of hospitalized patients with cancer to quantify exposure to inpatient and outpatient PC and describe associations between PC and end-of-life (EOL) quality measures. METHODS We identified all decedents admitted to an inpatient oncology unit in 1 year (October 1, 2017-September 30, 2018) and abstracted hospitalization statistics, inpatient and outpatient PC visits, and EOL outcomes. Descriptive statistics, univariate tests, and multivariate analysis evaluated associations between PC and patient outcomes. RESULTS In total, 522 decedents were identified. 50% saw PC; only 21% had an outpatient PC visit. Decedents seen by PC were more likely to enroll in hospice (78% v 44%; P < .001), have do-not-resuscitate status (87% v 55%; P < .001), have advance care planning documents (53% v 31%; P < .001), and die at home or inpatient hospice instead of in hospital (67% v 40%; P < .01). Decedents seen by PC had longer hospital length-of-stay (LOS; 8.4 v 7.0 days; P = .03), but this association reversed for decedents seen by outpatient PC (6.3 v 8.3 days; P < .001), who also had longer hospice LOS (46.5 v 27.1 days; P < .01) and less EOL intensive care (6% v 15%; P < .05). CONCLUSION PC was associated with significantly more hospice utilization and advance care planning. Patients seen specifically by outpatient PC had shorter hospital LOS and longer hospice LOS. These findings suggest different effects of inpatient and outpatient PC, underscoring the importance of robust outpatient PC.

Differential impact of inpatient and outpatient palliative care on end-of-life outcomes in hospitalized patients with cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 24-24
Author(s):  
Arielle R. Urman ◽  
Mary K. Buss ◽  
Robert J. Besaw ◽  
Laura E. Dodge ◽  
Kathleen A. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Quality Measures ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Fiscal Year ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Patients With Cancer

24 Background: Palliative care (PC) improves outcomes for patients with advanced cancer, and current ASCO guidelines recommend early outpatient referral. However, recent data show that PC teams at many cancer centers see more inpatient consults than outpatient visits; the comparative impact of inpatient versus outpatient PC is not well-described. For this reason, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized cancer patients to quantify exposure to inpatient/outpatient PC, and to describe associations between PC exposure and end-of-life (EOL) quality measures including hospice utilization, advance care planning (ACP), and intensity of care. Methods: We identified all patients admitted to one cancer center’s inpatient oncology unit during one fiscal year (10/1/2017-9/30/2018). Demographics, admission statistics, inpatient/outpatient PC visits, and EOL outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Decedents were identified through chart review and public obituaries. Results were summarized by descriptive statistics, and standard statistical tests were used to evaluate associations between PC exposure and EOL outcomes. Results: 842 patients were hospitalized in one year. 522 patients died by the study end-date of 10/1/2020 and were included in analysis. 50% of decedents had any PC exposure prior to death, but only 21% had an outpatient PC visit. Patients seen by PC were younger at time of death, (median: 67 vs 72 years; p <.001) and more likely to be female (52% vs 42%; p =.03). Compared to patients never seen by PC, patients with any PC exposure were significantly more likely to enroll in hospice (78% vs 44%; p <.0001), have do-not-resuscitate status (87% vs 55%; p <.0001), have scanned ACP documents (53% vs 31%; p <.0001), and die at home or inpatient hospice instead of in the hospital (67% vs 40%; p <.01). PC exposure was not associated with differences in 30-day re-admissions, systemic cancer therapy in the last 14 days of life, or intensive care (ICU) utilization in the last 30 days of life. Notably, PC exposure was associated with longer hospital length-of-stay (LOS) (8.4 vs 7.2 days), but this association was reversed for patients seen by outpatient PC versus all others (6.3 vs 8.2 days; p <.01). Patients seen by outpatient PC also had longer hospice LOS (46.5 vs 27.1 days; p <.01) and less EOL ICU use (6% vs 15%; p <.05) compared to all others. Conclusions: In this large retrospective study of hospitalized patients with cancer, PC exposure was associated with significant improvements in multiple EOL quality measures. The subset of patients seen by outpatient PC experienced additional benefits, including shorter hospital LOS, longer hospice LOS, and less EOL ICU utilization. These findings point to differential effects between inpatient and outpatient PC, underscoring the importance of early, longitudinal PC involvement.

Quality Improvement Initiatives to Reduce Mortality: An Opportunity to Engage Palliative Care and Improve Advance Care Planning

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Signe Peterson Flieger ◽  
Erica Spatz ◽  
Emily J. Cherlin ◽  
Leslie A. Curry
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Goals Of Care ◽  
Patient Goals ◽  
Advance Care

Background: Despite substantial efforts to integrate palliative care and improve advance care planning, both are underutilized. Quality improvement initiatives focused on reducing mortality may offer an opportunity for facilitating engagement with palliative care and advance care planning. Objective: In the context of an initiative to reduce acute myocardial infarction (AMI) mortality, we examined challenges and opportunities for engaging palliative care and improving advance care planning. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of qualitative data collected through the Leadership Saves Lives initiative between 2014 and 2016. Data included in-depth interviews with hospital executives, clinicians, administrators, and quality improvement staff (n = 28) from 5 hospitals participating in the Mayo Clinic Care Network. Focused analysis examined emergent themes related to end-of-life experiences, including palliative care and advance care planning. Results: Participants described challenges related to palliative care and advance care planning in the AMI context, including intervention decisions during an acute event, delivering care aligned with patient and family preferences, and the culture around palliative care and hospice. Participants proposed strategies for addressing such challenges in the context of improving AMI quality outcomes. Conclusions: Clinicians who participated in an initiative to reduce AMI mortality highlighted the challenges associated with decision-making regarding interventions, systems for documenting patient goals of care, and broader engagement with palliative care. Quality improvement initiatives focused on mortality may offer a meaningful and feasible opportunity for engaging palliative care. Primary palliative care training is needed to improve discussions about patient and family goals of care near the end of life.

IMPROVING END-OF-LIFE CARE AND ADVANCE CARE PLANNING FOR FRAIL OLDER ADULTS IN CANADA

2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
J. Downar ◽  
P. Moorhouse ◽  
R. Goldman ◽  
D. Grossman ◽  
S. Sinha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Frail Older Adults ◽  
Key Concepts ◽  
Advance Care

We present five Key Concepts that describe priorities for improving end-of-life care for frail older adults in Canada, and recommendations based on each Key Concept. Key Concept #1: Our end-of-life care system is focused on cancer, not frailty. Key Concept #2: We need better strategies to systematically identify frail older adults who would benefit from a palliative approach. Key Concept #3: The majority of palliative and end-of-life care will be, and should be, provided by clinicians who are not palliative care specialists. Key Concept #4: Organizational change and innovative funding models could deliver far better end-of-life care to frail individuals for less than we are currently spending. Key Concept #5: Improving the quality and quantity of advance care planning for frail older adults could reduce unwanted intensive care and costs at the end of life, and improve the experience for individuals and family members alike.

Advance care planning for patients with cancer in palliative care: A scoping review from a professional perspective

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (13-14) ◽  
pp. 2069-2082
Author(s):  
Anne Kuusisto ◽  
Jenni Santavirta ◽  
Kaija Saranto ◽  
Päivi Korhonen ◽  
Elina Haavisto
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Professional Perspective ◽  
Advance Care

scholarly journals Late decisions about treatment limitation in patients with cancer: empirical analysis of end-of-life practices in a haematology and oncology unit at a German university hospital

ESMO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. e000950
Author(s):  
Katja Mehlis ◽  
Elena Bierwirth ◽  
Katsiaryna Laryionava ◽  
Friederike Mumm ◽  
Pia Heussner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Solid Tumours ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Treatment Limitation ◽  
Ethics Policy ◽  
Advance Care

BackgroundDecisions to limit treatment (DLTs) are important to protect patients from overtreatment but constitute one of the most ethically challenging situations in oncology practice. In the Ethics Policy for Advance Care Planning and Limiting Treatment study (EPAL), we examined how often DLT preceded a patient’s death and how early they were determined before (T1) and after (T2) the implementation of an intrainstitutional ethics policy on DLT.MethodsThis prospective quantitative study recruited 1.134 patients with haematological/oncological neoplasia in a period of 2×6 months at the University Hospital of Munich, Germany. Information on admissions, discharges, diagnosis, age, DLT, date and place of death, and time span between the initial determination of a DLT and the death of a patient was recorded using a standardised form.ResultsOverall, for 21% (n=236) of the 1.134 patients, a DLT was made. After implementation of the policy, the proportion decreased (26% T1/16% T2). However, the decisions were more comprehensive, including more often the combination of ‘Do not resuscitate’ and ‘no intense care unit’ (44% T1/64% T2). The median time between the determination of a DLT and the patient’s death was similarly short with 6 days at a regular ward (each T1/T2) and 10.5/9 (T1/T2) days at a palliative care unit. For patients with solid tumours, the DLTs were made earlier at both regular and palliative care units than for the deceased with haematological neoplasia.ConclusionOur results show that an ethics policy on DLT could sensitise for treatment limitations in terms of frequency and extension but had no significant impact on timing of DLT. Since patients with haematological malignancies tend to undergo intensive therapy more often during their last days than patients with solid tumours, special attention needs to be paid to this group. To support timely discussions, we recommend the concept of advance care planning.

Integrative Palliative Care

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Lee ◽  
Stephanie Cheng ◽  
Dale Lupu
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Integrative Medicine ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Palliative Medicine ◽  
Geriatric Patients ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Patient Goals ◽  
Advance Care

Integrative medicine and palliative medicine share many tenets. This chapter reviews integrative approaches to the most common symptoms needing palliation among geriatric patients at the end of life, including pain, nausea and vomiting, constipation, dyspnea, and fatigue. Several palliative care approaches to communication about patient goals and advance care planning for a time when the patient is unable to make decisions are described. Resources to support advance care planning are provided. Finally, issues that need to be addressed by either primary care geriatrics or in consultation with palliative care in the last weeks, days, and hours of life are described.

Outpatient palliative care at a tertiary cancer center: Perceptions, pathways, and pitfalls.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 28-28
Author(s):  
Kavitha Ramchandran ◽  
Sandy Trieu ◽  
Stephanie Harman ◽  
Judy Passaglia ◽  
Janet Rodriguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Code Status ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Advance Care

28 Background: To describe an outpatient palliative care program at a quaternary cancer center- Stanford Cancer Institute. Outpatient palliative care (PC) programs are still in their nascency. Best practices are still being developed and key performance metrics are being delineated. This is a description of Stanford Cancer Institute outpatient PC program. Methods: Observational study of the first six months of encounters to the outpatient PC program. Description of potential barriers to launch and growth, as well as description of resources required for continued success. Data evaluated included program volume, referral patterns, advance care planning, symptom assessment and team structure as collected by the clinical team. Results: Initial barriers to program initiation included lack of funding and infrastructure. Additional barriers included coordination between teams, flow of care (patients late for next appointments), and cultural perceptions of palliative care as equal to end of life care. There are 32 referring practitioners to the program. Over the first six months the outpatient PC program has seen growth with volume increasing from 10 consults per month to 26 consults per month for a total of 60 patients. At the time of initial consult, 11 of the 60 patients seen had an advance directive. Only 1 patient had a physician order for life sustaining treatment (POLST). Code status was documented in 21 of the 60 patients. Conclusions: Our program had multiple barriers to launch: perceptions that palliative care equaled end of life care, lack of infrastructure and funding, and difficulty with coordination between teams. With administrative support the program secured funding, developed infrastructure with the assistance of IT, Cancer Center administration, and Care Coordination. Consults now come from a wide range of providers. Based on preliminary data indicating a very low percentage of completion of these tasks by patients on initial consult there is need for outpatient palliative care for advance care planning. Future growth will include continued penetration of the cancer center, increasing volume of consults, and additional assessments of patient satisfaction, symptom improvement, and hospital utilization.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document