Integration of Remote Sensing and Digital Terrain Models for Land Cover Classifications, Thematic Mapping and Regional Planning in Val Malenco (Italian Alps)

Author(s):  
Maria Luisa Paracchini ◽  
Sten. Folving
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Salach ◽  
Krzysztof Bakuła ◽  
Magdalena Pilarska ◽  
Wojciech Ostrowski ◽  
Konrad Górski ◽  
...  

In this paper, the results of an experiment about the vertical accuracy of generated digital terrain models were assessed. The created models were based on two techniques: LiDAR and photogrammetry. The data were acquired using an ultralight laser scanner, which was dedicated to Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) platforms that provide very dense point clouds (180 points per square meter), and an RGB digital camera that collects data at very high resolution (a ground sampling distance of 2 cm). The vertical error of the digital terrain models (DTMs) was evaluated based on the surveying data measured in the field and compared to airborne laser scanning collected with a manned plane. The data were acquired in summer during a corridor flight mission over levees and their surroundings, where various types of land cover were observed. The experiment results showed unequivocally, that the terrain models obtained using LiDAR technology were more accurate. An attempt to assess the accuracy and possibilities of penetration of the point cloud from the image-based approach, whilst referring to various types of land cover, was conducted based on Real Time Kinematic Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS-RTK) measurements and was compared to archival airborne laser scanning data. The vertical accuracy of DTM was evaluated for uncovered and vegetation areas separately, providing information about the influence of the vegetation height on the results of the bare ground extraction and DTM generation. In uncovered and low vegetation areas (0–20 cm), the vertical accuracies of digital terrain models generated from different data sources were quite similar: for the UAV Laser Scanning (ULS) data, the RMSE was 0.11 m, and for the image-based data collected using the UAV platform, it was 0.14 m, whereas for medium vegetation (higher than 60 cm), the RMSE from these two data sources were 0.11 m and 0.36 m, respectively. A decrease in the accuracy of 0.10 m, for every 20 cm of vegetation height, was observed for photogrammetric data; and such a dependency was not noticed in the case of models created from the ULS data.


2017 ◽  
Vol 928 (10) ◽  
pp. 50-57
Author(s):  
N.E. Zharova ◽  
A.V. Bekenov ◽  
Aleksandr Chibunichev

Since the end of 2016 the imagery data from the Russian remote sensing satellites including Resurs-P spacecrafts have become commercially available in Russia, the CIS and far abroad. In this article we consider the possibility of automatic generation of digital terrain models using a stereo “fortuitous” image pair derived from two different Resurs-P spacecrafts. For the analysis we used two different date panchromatic images of the same area of Voronezh region in Russia. The images were obtained by the Geoton-L1 sensor of two different spacecrafts


2013 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 59-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ihor Kolb ◽  
◽  
Marija Lucyshyn ◽  
Małgorzata Panek ◽  
◽  
...  

Water ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenni-Mari Vesakoski ◽  
Petteri Alho ◽  
Juha Hyyppä ◽  
Markus Holopainen ◽  
Claude Flener ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document