Structured Management of Innovation Projects

Innovation ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 31-57
Author(s):  
Adedeji B. Badiru
2019 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 04053
Author(s):  
Tatyana Burtseva ◽  
Lyudmila Rudenko ◽  
Olga Fokina ◽  
Olga Pavlyutenkova

Management of innovative projects requires a deep assessment of various risks, and financial risks here are especially important. Management of financial risks in the field of innovative activity significantly affects the efficiency of the whole work. It is also one of the most important components of the project activity. The article describes research results of the main target segments for planning a program of financial risk management. The research is based on a cluster analysis that describes the most significant groups of risk factors. Enterprises implementing innovative projects need to pay special attention to these factors, especially when developing various measures for the formation and development of innovative activities and the management of various risks.


2012 ◽  
Vol 09 (04) ◽  
pp. 1250025 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALF STEINAR SÆTRE ◽  
ERIC BRUN

This paper offers a model for effectively managing ambiguity at the fuzzy front end of innovation projects. We conducted in-depth studies of four new product development projects from the medical device industry. Through the abductive process of iterative grounded theory we built a model of the management of ambiguity. The model we propose shows that innovation teams that have a higher tolerance for ambiguity are better able to exploit it. The successful management of ambiguity in innovation projects rests upon the balancing of opposing needs.


2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Grajkowska

PurposeThe main purpose of this study is to contribute to the theory of intellectual capital (IC) with the new IC valuation method based on the economic value added (EVA®) concept as well as to present the Innovation Funnel, which is a useful management method and tool from which companies would benefit.Design/methodology/approachThe paper first explains the links and differences between IC and intellectual assets (IAs) and aims at improving the reader's understanding of the share of the two classes of shareholders, monetary capital investors and intellectual capital investors, of the innovative start‐ups. The paper provides practical guidance for use in IC valuation and financial management of innovation rather than a theoretical framework, and is based on the literature on innovation, IC, corporate finance as well as the practical experience of a few early stage venture capitals with whom the author cooperates.FindingsThe findings show a way of calculating fair share of an innovative company's shareholdings. The method reflects the risk adjusted future value of cash invested by monetary capital investors and a real market value of IC contributed by the founders. The paper also presents a method of financial management of innovation projects.Research limitations/implicationsThe presented methods focus on creating shareholder value and on financial aspects of IC rather than on IC indicators and their graphical representation, hence, members of the IC community who seek more practical concepts may be more interested in the paper.Originality/valueThe paper proposes a practical perspective on the method for IC valuation, innovation projects' financial management, as well as fair division of a start‐up shares between intellectual and monetary capital investors that would be useful for venture capital officers, innovative companies founders and R&D centers' managers.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2(22)) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Тигран Георгиевич Григорян ◽  
Алексей Сергеевич Корзняков

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document