National Labor Relations Act and Unfair Labor Practices

Author(s):  
Thomas D. Schneid ◽  
Shelby L. Schneid
ILR Review ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myron Roomkin

The number of charges of unfair labor practices filed with the National Labor Relations Board has grown steadily. This article analyzes the incidence of case filings since 1952 as a function of economic variables, such as the unemployment rate and changes in the price level; the number of strikes and representation petitions filed, since both tend to produce litigation; and aspects of the Board's administrative processes that tend to encourage or discourage case filings, such as the extent of delay. The study finds that, contrary to the assumptions of national labor policy, the Board's activities themselves may be an important determinant of union and employer demands for regulatory intervention. The model proves less satisfactory, however, in explaining the filing behavior of individuals, suggesting that workers have unrealistic expectations about the protection offered them by the National Labor Relations Act.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Pope

Between 1936 and 1939, American workers staged some 583 sit-down strikes of at least one day's duration. In the latter year, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion inNLRB v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corporation, resolving the official legal status of the tactic.Fansteelmade it clear not only that a state could punish sit-downers for violating trespass laws, but also that an employer could lawfully discharge them—even if that employer had itself provoked the sit-down by committing unfair labor practices in violation of the National Labor Relations Act.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document