The assessment of groundwater chemical status and modelling of agriculture pressures

2021 ◽  
pp. 107-117
Author(s):  
R. Duda ◽  
M. Paszkiewicz
Keyword(s):  
1952 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. H. Wadleigh ◽  
J. W. Brown
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nebojša Đ. Pantelic ◽  
◽  
Jana S. Štrbacki ◽  
Goran Markovic ◽  
Jelena B. Popovic-Đorđevic ◽  
...  

The water samples collected from four localities of the middle course of the Zapadna Morava River during 2020 were analyzed via the selected physico-chemical parameters with the aim to estimate the quality of surface water. According to the results of selected physico-chemical parameters (pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, chemical oxygen demand, biochemical oxygen demand), analyzed surface water show a good chemical status, while the values of nutrient content (nitrate, nitrite, ammonium ion, total phosphorus) indicated the poor chemical status especially at the locality 4 probably due to the outflow of wastewater from the city of Čačak as well as from the influence of the polluted water of the Čemernica River.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Gourcy ◽  
Klaus Hinsby ◽  
Laerke Thorling ◽  
Stephanie Pinson ◽  
Matthew Ascott ◽  
...  

<p>Denitrification potential is an important parameter to know for adequate and efficient management and assessment of groundwater vulnerability and chemical status. Denitrification removes nitrate in groundwater, but the denitrification capacity is highly variable in space and time, and it may be used up with time. When linking pressure and impact the effect of partial or complete denitrification and denitrification capacity should be taken into account. In some areas, denitrification is seen as an advantage, allowing higher N release below soil without leading to a decrease of the groundwater quality and eventually concentrations in groundwater higher than the WFD and DWD threshold values, which EU member states have to establish to protect drinking water and groundwater dependent terrestrial and associated aquatic ecosystems.    </p><p>Within the GEOERA HOVER project, the aim was to assess the spatial extent and importance of denitrification. The studied cases permitted at a first step to highlight the heterogeneities of the approaches due to the variability of information obtained i.e. the likelihood of denitrification, depth and thickness of redox transition zone, complete denitrification status. The parameters used to define the denitrification vary also from one country to another based on a large set of redox sensitive ions (Eh, O<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>3</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>, Fe, Mn, SO<sub>4</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>-NO3</sub> et δ<sup>15</sup>N-<sub>NO3</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>S or N<sub>2</sub>). Some of these parameters can be accessed by standard methods in most laboratories, used for groundwater quality monitoring, while others require specialized analysis and interpretations.</p><p>Considering groundwater and hydrogeological data available in most of the EU countries, a simple method is proposed in order to classify the monitoring points into three classes: oxic, anoxic and mixed. After being tested in different well-known areas the method will be applied in various lithologies and hydrogeological contexts The proposed method will enable the development of European maps supporting groundwater quality management across Europe.</p>


2007 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 97-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Kunkel ◽  
F. Wendland ◽  
S. Hannappel ◽  
H.J. Voigt ◽  
R. Wolter

Commissioned by Germany's Working Group of the Federal States on Water Problems (LAWA) the authors developed a procedure to define natural groundwater conditions from groundwater monitoring data. The distribution pattern of a specific groundwater parameter observed by a number of groundwater monitoring stations within a petrographically comparable groundwater typology is reproduced by two statistical distribution functions, representing the “natural” and “influenced” component. The range of natural groundwater concentrations is characterized by confidence intervals of the distribution function of the natural component. The applicability of the approach was established for 17 hydrochemical different groundwater typologies occurring throughout Germany. Based on groundwater monitoring data from ca. 26,000 groundwater-monitoring stations, 40 different hydrochemical parameters were evaluated for each groundwater typology. For all investigated parameters the range of natural groundwater concentrations has been identified. According to the requirements of the EC Water Framework Directive (article 17) (WFD) this study is a basis for the German position to propose criteria for assessing a reference state for a “good groundwater chemical status”.


2018 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 00003 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bikše ◽  
I. Retike

Groundwater quality in coastal areas is frequently affected by seawater intrusion as a consequence of intensive water consumption. To achieve “good chemical status” of a groundwater body according to Water Framework Directive the effects of saline or other intrusions should not be observed. Groundwater pumping in former decades has caused a significant seawater intrusion into confined aquifer in Liepāja and has led to deterioration of relatively wide coastal area of the third largest city in Latvia. However, the area affected by seawater intrusion is a small part of groundwater body F1 which overall chemical status is good. Thus, no specific management measures have been applied to explore and control seawater intrusion. A political decision was made to delineate the area affected by seawater intrusion as new groundwater body at risk- F5. This study demonstrates simple approach for delineation of groundwater bodies at risk in coastal areas. Delineation process was based on chloride concentration gradient along the well profile and gradient based buffers. Finally, the worst-case scenario was selected for delineation of boundaries.


2012 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 1406-1414 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Mandelman ◽  
R. A. Morrison ◽  
J. M. Cavin ◽  
M. A. Farrington
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Karine Beaugelin-Seiller ◽  
Laureline Février ◽  
Rodolphe Gilbin ◽  
Jacqueline Garnier-Laplace

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document