The high-cycle accumulation (HCA) model proposed by the authors can be used to predict permanent deformations or stress relaxation due to a large number (e.g., several millions) of load cycles with relative small strain amplitudes (<10−3). The predicted stress relaxation depends on the isotropic “elastic stiffness”, [Formula: see text], used in the HCA model. To calibrate the bulk modulus, K, the rate of pore pressure accumulation obtained from an undrained cyclic test and the rate of volumetric strain accumulation measured in a drained cyclic test are compared. Poisson’s ratio, ν, can be determined from the shape of the stress relaxation path measured in an undrained test with anisotropic consolidation stresses and strain cycles. Unfortunately, the calibration of K shown for a medium coarse sand in a previous paper by Wichtmann et al. in 2010 was affected by membrane penetration effects. Consequently, all further studies have been performed on a fine sand for which membrane penetration is negligible. The present paper reports on the new results. The strong pressure dependence of K and its independence from amplitude found in the previous study could be confirmed by the new tests. In addition, the new experimental results reveal a density dependence of K, while the bulk modulus is rather independent of stress ratio. Furthermore, for the first time Poisson’s ratio, ν, used in the HCA model has been calibrated based on tests performed with different amplitudes, densities, and initial stresses.
Rational modelling of elastic soil behaviour in 3D condition
