Two Decades of Application of Permeable Reactive Barriers to Groundwater Remediation

2018 ◽  
pp. 25-39
Author(s):  
Scott D. Warner
2016 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 128-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Wang ◽  
Saraya Pleasant ◽  
Pradeep Jain ◽  
Jon Powell ◽  
Timothy Townsend

Processes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viet Cao ◽  
Huichen Yang ◽  
Arnaud Igor Ndé-Tchoupé ◽  
Rui Hu ◽  
Willis Gwenzi ◽  
...  

The technology of using metallic iron (Fe0) for in situ generation of iron oxides for water treatment is a very old one. The Fe0 remediation technology has been re-discovered in the framework of groundwater remediation using permeable reactive barriers (PRBs). Despite its simplicity, the improvement of Fe0 PRBs is fraught with difficulties regarding their operating modes. The literature dealing with Fe0 remediation contains ambiguities regarding its invention and its development. The present paper examines the sequence of contributions prior to the advent of Fe0 PRBs in order to clarify the seemingly complex picture. To achieve this, the current paper addresses the following questions: (i) What were the motivations of various authors in developing their respective innovations over the years?, (ii) what are the ancient achievements which can accelerate progress in knowledge for the development of Fe0 PRBs?, and (iii) was Fe0 really used for the removal of organic species for the first time in the 1970s? A careful examination of ancient works reveals that: (i) The wrong questions were asked during the past three decades, as Fe0 was premised as a reducing agent, (ii) credit for using Fe0 for water treatment belongs to no individual scientist, and (iii) credit for the use of Fe0 in filtration systems for safe drinking water provision belongs to scientists from the 1850s, while credit for the use of Fe0 for the removal of aqueous organic species does not belong to the pioneers of the Fe0 PRB technology. However, it was these pioneers who exploited Fe0 for groundwater remediation, thereby extending its potential. Complementing recent achievements with the chemistry of the Fe0/H2O system would facilitate the design of more sustainable Fe0-remediation systems.


RSC Advances ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (30) ◽  
pp. 16834-16841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shengpin Li ◽  
Wenpeng Li ◽  
Honghan Chen ◽  
Fei Liu ◽  
Song Jin ◽  
...  

Activated carbon (AC) is widely used in groundwater remediation, more specifically, for the activated carbon permeable barriers (AC-PRBs).


Chemosphere ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 243-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franklin Obiri-Nyarko ◽  
S. Johana Grajales-Mesa ◽  
Grzegorz Malina

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Teresa Barral ◽  
Ángel Liste ◽  
Alejandro Balufo ◽  
Remigio Paradelo ◽  
Javier Cancelo-González ◽  
...  

Permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) are efficient and cost-effective systems for groundwater remediation. Different types of material have been tested as reactive media for constructing PRBs. To this purpose, the use of waste materials is of particular interest, provided they meet some permeability and reactivity requirements. In the present study, the use of granite powder, a waste generated during the process of cutting granite, was evaluated as a component of PRB filler, mixed in different proportions with compost. The Cr(VI) adsorption capacity and desorption behaviour of granite powder, pine bark compost, composted municipal solid waste and mixtures containing different proportions of granite powder and compost was compared. Individually, the granite powder was not suitable for use as PRB filler because of its moderate permeability and Cr(VI) adsorption capacity. The addition of pine bark compost increased the hydraulic conductivity and improved the Cr(VI) adsorption capacity of the material, while decreasing Cr desorption. In turn, the addition of compost derived from municipal solid waste did not have the same beneficial effect, as it decreased the hydraulic conductivity of the mixtures and had only slightly improved the adsorption capacity. In summary, mixtures containing 50 or 25% granite powder and 50 or 75% pine bark compost (v/v), respectively, were the best materials for use as a PRB in relation to cost/effectiveness.


2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim V. Rouse ◽  
Richard M. Thomasser ◽  
Cathleen A. Terentieff ◽  
Lisa A. Hall

AbstractPreviously, the authors have developed the concept of in-situ reduction of hexavalent chromium in contaminated groundwater, using various forms of active reagent delivery, based on site geohydrological conditions. While these approaches are highly successful and cost effective, in some cases, such active approaches may not be appropriate. Rather, it may be appropriate to limit the spread of chromium contamination by formation of permeable reactive barriers or reactive zones through the borehole placement of aqueous reductants. A passive approach, utilizing bore-hole placed reactive barriers and Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA), offers real advantages for groundwater remediation, especially in situations involving groundwater in fractured or cavernous bedrock, where the water table is at great depth, or where on-going activities in the source area limit access for more active approaches. A geochemical reactive barrier was used at a South Australian timber preservation facility sited over a cavernous limestone. After remedial activities within the plume achieved significant reduction of the mobile chromium mass, the applicable regulatory agency authorized MNA for control of residual contamination. A phased approach has been utilized at a Central Valley, California timber preservation site, to develop data on the radial spread of reductant injection through diffusion, and the longevity of the effect of such injection, and a full-scale remedial approach designed, recognizing limitations on injection imposed by limited access. The paper discusses the requirements to demonstrate the effectiveness of MNA. Case histories of successful application of the integrated approach of passive reduction and MNA are presented, as a cost-effective and environmentally-protective means of accomplishing remediation of hexavalent chromium in groundwater.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document