Youth Civic Engagement in the United States: Understanding and Addressing the Impact of Social Impediments on Positive Youth and Community Development

2005 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 188-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aida B. Balsano
2019 ◽  
pp. 0044118X1988373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Gustafson ◽  
Alison K. Cohen ◽  
Sarah Andes

Youth civic engagement is relatively low in the United States. However, when students are involved in an action civics class (like Generation Citizen), they enthusiastically take action on a wide variety of topics. To systematically assess what issues youth are interested in, we analyzed administrative data from 1,651 action projects conducted by students in Generation Citizen classes across the United States from fall 2012 through fall 2017. We found that the most common issues of interest were related to safety and violence or schooling. Over one quarter of projects tackled issues of trauma, and a similar proportion tackled issues of equity. This exploratory study helps reveal what urban youth in Generation Citizen classes around the county view as of civic interest and important to them. We encourage future researchers and practitioners to further document youth voice regarding civic action as we seek to understand and lift up young people’s unique insights.


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 400-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melody L. Boyd ◽  
Jason Martin ◽  
Kathryn Edin

Recent research finds that there is a growing class gap in levels of civic engagement among young whites in the United States. Much of the literature on civic engagement focuses on individual– and family–level factors related to civic engagement. Our evidence suggests that it is critically important to consider variation and change in community–level factors as well, and that such factors may play a key role in facilitating or inhibiting civic engagement. To explore the puzzle of the growing class gap among young whites in civic engagement, we conducted two–generation in–depth qualitative interviews in white working class neighborhoods in Philadelphia and its inner suburbs, with companion interviews among Philadelphia–area youth living in middle class communities. We complement these interviews with quantitative measures of institutional and demographic changes in these neighborhoods over time. Our evidence suggests that a withdrawal of institutional investments in working class neighborhoods (and relative to middle class neighborhoods), along with an increase in population turnover and racial and ethnic heterogeneity, which has disproportionately impacted working class neighborhoods as well, may be important factors in understanding the growing class gap in civic engagement among white youth.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-39
Author(s):  
Jeff M. Poulin

Young people are envisioning the future of their communities. The future is theirs. Youth see the challenges our communities are facing today and understand the need to use their creativity to dismantle our problematic systems. As adults, we must support the creative work of youth, cede power where possible, and uplift their visions for the future. To do this, we must understand the immense and expansive impact of creative youth on communities. Through this research initiative, young creative people, their adult allies, and a team of researchers have reviewed literature, data sets, and case studies – comprised of interviews, narratives, and artistic works – to examine the challenges and opportunities that exist at the intersection of arts & culture, community development, and youth development. This field scan seeks to answer the question: What impact do creative youth have on communities? Following an introduction that includes the research design and methods, we provide an outline of the context of this work that emphasizes where the field is now, as addressed by the current literature and the combined crises and insights of 2020. We then present the key findings that seek to expand on our simple answer to the question posed above presented through the perspectives of young creatives. Unabashedly, young creatives believe their projects benefit both people and places and promote more just and thriving communities. In the following two sections, we provide emerging lessons that include both additional learnings from the research and a set of researcher-generated provocations articulating the ideas that young creatives shared about the future of their projects in communities. Upon deep analysis, we conclude that through creative youth & community development projects, creative young people impact their communities in significant ways which too often go unacknowledged. We conclude that in communities where creative youth & community development projects are present, youth see a future where: Youth increase creativity and cultivate greater agency in themselves and others Communities (people and places) are more sustainable and responsive Youth-serving organizations honor personal identity and build collective belonging Places and their populations are healthier, safer, and better able to foster wellbeing Youth and adults catalyze intergenerational cultural continuity Further, we found an increased importance of partnering across sectors and among stakeholders to increase the impacts of creative youth in communities. Creative youth believe their projects benefit from working “in community” with others, meaning strategically investing time, resources, and relationships with other youth, adults, projects, and organizations. By doing so, they believe their projects have a greater impact on people and places. Through our analysis of the full sample of programs, we discovered a significant portion of the field uses youth development and creative placemaking approaches alongside deep engagement with an allied social sector. Creative youth also believe the impact of their projects was enhanced by an intentional mapping of the full range of stakeholders they sought to impact. Finally, we conclude that creative youth believe their projects need new language and measures of success. In order to achieve this, the fields of creative youth development, creative placemaking, and their allied sectors need to evolve their approaches to defining, researching, and measuring success. We believe that young people and adults must work together to define and build these. The intended audiences for this field scan include practitioners and supporters of creative youth & community development projects who work in the arts & culture, youth development, community development, creative youth development, creative placemaking, or allied sectors. Throughout the publication, we have provided tangible models in order to guide practitioners towards application of the ideas within their own work and context. We researched and wrote this scan from June through November 2020, in the midst of several crises impacting communities throughout the United States: the global COVID-19 pandemic, the resulting economic recession, the political uncertainty of the 2020 U.S. presidential election, and the community uprisings and racial reckoning resulting from the violence against Black civilians at the hands of police. Our findings reflect these circumstances and are presented with the urgency these events demand. These circumstances – and the resulting actions of young creatives around the United States – are the precise reason why we do this work. The creative contributions of young people to their communities, particularly in times of crisis, exemplifies the urgency and responsibility of their adult allies to support their creative social change pursuits. Now is the time we need this work most.


2006 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Brettell

Soon after 9/11 a research project to study new immigration into the Dallas Fort Worth metropolitan area got under way. In the questionnaire that was administered to 600 immigrants across five different immigrant populations (Asian Indians, Vietnamese, Mexicans, Salvadorans, and Nigerians) between 2003 and 2005 we decided to include a question about the impact of 9/11 on their lives. We asked: “How has the attack on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 affected your position as an immigrant in the United States?” This article analyzes the responses to this question, looking at similarities and differences across different immigrant populations. It also addresses the broader issue of how 9/11 has affected both immigration policy and attitudes toward the foreign-born in the United States. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document