scholarly journals Prevention of Early Postmenopausal Bone Loss with Cyclical Etidronate Therapy (A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study and 1-Year Follow-Up)*

1997 ◽  
Vol 82 (9) ◽  
pp. 2784-2791
Author(s):  
P. J. Meunier ◽  
E. Confavreux ◽  
I. Tupinon ◽  
C. Hardouin ◽  
P. D. Delmas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Treatment Withdrawal ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Serum Osteocalcin ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Cyclical Etidronate

Abstract The objective of the study was to evaluate the effects of cyclical therapy with etidronate and calcium on spinal and femoral bone loss in the early post menopausal period. Fifty-four women, 53 ± 2.8 yr old (mean ± sd) and 2.3 ± 1.3 yr post menopause received oral doses of either 400 mg/day etidronate for 2 weeks followed by 500 mg/day elemental calcium for 11 weeks, or placebo for 14 days followed by calcium for 11 weeks, repeated over a total of 24 months. A statistically significant increase in spinal bone mineral density (BMD) was observed after 6 months in the etidronate group. At 2 yr, the mean treatment differences in spinal and femoral neck BMD were+ 2.93% (P < 0.02) and 2.02% (P < 0.03), respectively. Serum osteocalcin and urinary crossLaps/creatinine excretion were decreased signficantly by etidronate. Etidronate was well tolerated with a safety profile similar to that of placebo. Thirty-seven women participated in a 1-yr open-label follow-up study. Twelve months after treatment withdrawal, spinal BMD in the former etidronate group decreased by 1.43% and serum osteocalcin and urinary crossLaps returned to pretreatment values. In conclusion, cyclical etidronate is an effective therapy for the prevention of both trabecular and cortical bone loss in the early menopause and has a good safety profile.

Bisphosphonate risedronate prevents bone loss in women with artificial menopause due to chemotherapy of breast cancer: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 955-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
P D Delmas ◽  
R Balena ◽  
E Confravreux ◽  
C Hardouin ◽  
P Hardy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
White Women ◽  
Treatment Withdrawal ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Treatment Needs ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Double Blind

PURPOSE To determine the effectiveness and safety of the bisphosphonate risedronate in preventing bone loss in young women with breast cancer and early menopause induced by chemotherapy who are at major risk for the development of postmenopausal osteoporosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-three white women, aged 36 to 55 years, with breast cancer and artificially induced menopause were stratified according to prior tamoxifen use. Thirty-six patients received tamoxifen (20 mg/d). Within each stratum, patients were randomly assigned to receive risedronate (n = 27) or placebo (n = 26). Treatment consisted of eight cycles oral risedronate 30 mg/d or placebo daily for 2 weeks followed by 10 weeks of no drug (12 weeks per cycle). Patients were monitored for a third year without treatment. RESULTS Main outcomes of the study were changes in lumbar spine and proximal femur (femoral neck, trochanter, and Ward's triangle) bone mineral density (BMD), and biochemical markers of bone turnover. In contrast to a significant decrease of BMD at the lumbar spine and hip in the placebo group, there was an increase in BMD in the risedronate group. On treatment withdrawal, bone loss ensued, which suggests that treatment needs to be continuous to maintain a protective effect on bone mass. At 2 years, the mean difference (+/- SEM) between groups was 2.5% +/- 1.2%, (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2 to 4.9) at the lumbar spine (P = .041) and 2.6% +/- 1.1%, (95% CI, 0.3 to 4.8) at the femoral neck (P = .029). Similar results were observed at the hip trochanter. Results by stratum indicate a beneficial, although partial, effect of tamoxifen in reducing bone loss. Risedronate was well tolerated and showed a good safety profile, with no evidence of laboratory abnormalities. CONCLUSION Risedronate appears to be a safe treatment that prevents both trabecular and cortical bone loss in women with menopause induced by chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Primary analysis of a randomized, double-blind, phase II study of the anti-TIGIT antibody tiragolumab (tira) plus atezolizumab (atezo) versus placebo plus atezo as first-line (1L) treatment in patients with PD-L1-selected NSCLC (CITYSCAPE).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9503-9503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delvys Rodriguez-Abreu ◽  
Melissa Lynne Johnson ◽  
Maen A. Hussein ◽  
Manuel Cobo ◽  
Anjan Jayantilal Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Treatment Withdrawal ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Activated T Cells ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Meaningful Improvement

9503 Background: The immunomodulatory receptor TIGIT is a novel inhibitory immune checkpoint present on activated T cells and NK cells in multiple cancers, including NSCLC. In a phase I study (GO30103), co-inhibition of TIGIT and PD-L1 signaling with tira plus atezo in CIT-naïve PD-L1 positive NSCLC potentially improved overall response rates (ORR) compared to historical ORR with PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors. We conducted this phase II trial to confirm the efficacy and safety of tira plus atezo (TA) compared to placebo plus atezo (PA) in 1L NSCLC (GO40290, NCT NCT03563716). Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled patients (pts) with chemotherapy-naïve PD-L1+ (TPS ≥ 1% by 22C3 IHC pharmDx Dako assay) locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with measurable disease, ECOG PS 0-1, and without EGFR or ALK alterations. Pts were randomized 1:1 to TA (tira 600 mg IV plus atezo 1200 mg IV) or PA (placebo plus atezo 1200 mg IV) on day 1 of every 3-week cycle. Stratification factors were PD-L1 status (TPS ≥ 50% vs TPS 1-49%), histology, and tobacco history. Co-primary endpoints were investigator assessed ORR and PFS, and additional endpoints were duration of response (DOR), OS, and safety. Exploratory endpoints were the effect of PD-L1 status on ORR and PFS. Results: 135 pts were randomized to PA (n = 68) or TA (n = 67). At primary analysis (30 Jun 2019), TA improved ORR and median PFS (mPFS) compared to PA, with median follow-up of 5.9 mo. In the safety population (68 in PA, 67 in TA), treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 72% (PA) and 80.6% (TA); Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 19.1% (PA) and 14.9% (TA). AEs leading to treatment withdrawal occurred in 10.3% (PA) and 7.5% (TA). Clinical trial information: NCT03563716 . With an additional six months of follow-up since the primary analysis (2 Dec 2019, median follow-up of 10.9 mo), improvement in ORR and mPFS was maintained in ITT for TA (37.3% [25.0, 49.6] and 5.6 mo [4.2, 10.4]) vs PA (20.6% [10.2, 30.9] and 3.9 mo [2.7, 4.5]). The safety profile remained tolerable. Conclusions: Treatment with TA compared to PA showed clinically meaningful improvement in ORR and PFS in ITT. The safety profile of TA was similar to PA. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Almotriptan 12.5 mg in menstrually related migraine: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Cephalalgia ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianni Allais ◽  
Gennaro Bussone ◽  
Giovanni D’Andrea ◽  
Franca Moschiano ◽  
Florindo d’Onofrio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Rescue Medication ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Prospective Data ◽  
Menstrually Related Migraine ◽  
Suitable Target

Background: Menstrually related migraine (MRM) affects more than half of female migraineurs. Because such migraines are often predictable, they provide a suitable target for treatment in the mild pain phase. The present study was designed to provide prospective data on the efficacy of almotriptan for treatment of MRM. Methods: Premenopausal women with MRM were randomized to almotriptan ( N = 74) or placebo ( N = 73), taken at onset of the first perimenstrual migraine. Patients crossed over to the other treatment for the first perimenstrual migraine of their second cycle, followed by a two-month open-label almotriptan treatment period. Results: Significantly more patients were pain-free at two hours (risk ratio [RR] = 1.81; p = .0008), pain-free from 2–24 hours with no rescue medication (RR = 1.99; p = .0022), and pain-free from 2–24 hours with no rescue medication or adverse events (RR = 1.94; p = .0061) with almotriptan versus placebo. Nausea ( p = .0007) and photophobia ( p = .0083) at two hours were significantly less frequent with almotriptan. Almotriptan efficacy was consistent between three attacks, with 56.2% of patients pain-free at two hours at least twice. Adverse events were similar with almotriptan and placebo. Conclusion: Almotriptan was significantly more effective than placebo in women with MRM attacks, with consistent efficacy in longer-term follow-up.

Effect of monthly oral ibandronate on anastrozole-induced bone loss during adjuvant treatment for breast cancer: One-year results from the ARIBON study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 553-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Lester ◽  
S. A. Gutcher ◽  
S. P. Ellis ◽  
R. Thorpe ◽  
J. M. Horsman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Bone Metabolism ◽  
Biochemical Markers ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
The Impact

553 Background: The aromatase inhibitor anastrozole is a highly effective treatment for breast cancer with superior efficacy and tolerability advantages over tamoxifen. However its use is associated with significant declines in bone mineral density (BMD) with an increase in fracture risk. The ARIBON trial is a double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study designed to evaluate the impact of bisphosphonate treatment on BMD in women taking anastrozole. The study also aims to explore the relationship between levels of biochemical markers of bone metabolism with longer term changes in BMD as measured by Dual energy Xray Absorptiometry (DXA). Methods: 131 postmenopausal, surgically treated breast cancer patients were recruited from oncology clinics in Leeds and Sheffield, UK. Following consent, baseline bone densitometry showed that 68, 50 and 13 patients were found to be normal (T >-1.0), osteopenic (T -1.0 to -2.5) and osteoporotic (T < -2.5) respectively. All patients were treated with anastrozole 1mg once a day and offered calcium and vitamin D supplementation. In addition, osteopenic patients were randomised on a 1:1 basis to receive either treatment with ibandronate 150 mg orally every month or placebo. Osteoporotic patients were treated with open label ibandronate orally 150mg every month. Results: After I year, osteopenic patients treated with ibandronate gained +2.78% (range -3.8, +15.1) and +1.35% (range -4.1, +5.6) at the lumbar spine and hip respectively. Patients treated with placebo however lost -2.61% (range -11.0, +2.2) at the lumbar spine and -2.34% (range -10.4, +5.2) at the hip. The differences between the two treatment arms were statistically significant at both sites (p<0.001, independent samples t-test). Patients with osteoporosis gained +5.05% (range -8.7, +15.2) at the lumbar spine and +2.62% (range -1.0, +8.6) at the hip after 1 year. Conclusions: Ibandronate 150 mg by mouth once a month prevents anastrozole induced bone loss and results in significant increases in BMD at the hip and lumbar spine in osteopenic and osteoporotic patients. Analysis of the biochemical markers of bone metabolism is underway and relationships between biochemical and BMD changes will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Digital Ulcers in Ssc Treated with Oral Treprostinil: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study with Open-Label Follow-up

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Seibold ◽  
Fredrick M. Wigley ◽  
Elena Schiopu ◽  
Christopher P. Denton ◽  
Richard M. Silver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Study ◽  
Digital Ulcers ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document