Combination immunotherapy for advanced melanoma gets early approval from NICE

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akhil Kapoor ◽  
Ankita Rungta ◽  
HarvindraSingh Kumar ◽  
Rajesh Kumar

2022 ◽  
Vol 386 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-92
Author(s):  
Adam E. Frampton ◽  
Shivan Sivakumar

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9585-9585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad A. Tarhini ◽  
Zahra Rahman ◽  
Yan Lin ◽  
Priyanka Vallabhaneni ◽  
Hussein Abdul-Hassan Tawbi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 194-194
Author(s):  
Qiyun Ou ◽  
Yunfang Yu ◽  
Dagui Lin ◽  
Tuping Fu ◽  
Quanlong Gao ◽  
...  

194 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors selection in advanced melanoma is complicated further, with choices among anti-CTLA4 or anti-PD-1 therapeutic antibodies options. We aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitors for discussing evidence-based treatment strategies by a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) data. Methods: We searched for RCTs investigating immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced melanoma until September 2017. Hazard ratios (HRs) was estimated for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The quality of the evidence was evaluated with the GRADE framework. Results: Overall, 18 RCTs including a total of 8,917 patients were identified. Immune checkpoint inhibitors versus placebo or observation prolonged PFS (HR = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44 to 0.78, P < 0.0001) and OS (HR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.84, P < 0.0001). The combination immunotherapy had significantly higher benefit than monotherapy for PFS (HR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.92, P = 0.005) and OS (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.79, P < 0.0001). Treatment with anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody was associated with improved PFS (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.69, P < 0.0001) and OS (HR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.77, P < 0.0001) compared with anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody. According to BRAF status analysis, there was a PFS benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors versus placebo or observation (mutant, HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.96, P = 0.035; wild–type, HR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.69, P = 0.001), anti-PD-1 outperformed anti-CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibitor (mutant, PFS HR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.79, P < 0.0001; wild–type, PFS HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.71, P < 0.0001); and combination compared with single-agent immunotherapy (mutant, HR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.98, P = 0.046; wild–type, HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.69, P = 0.001). Conclusions: This analysis provides an evidence that immune checkpoint inhibitors enhanced OS and PFS in patients with advanced melanoma, as well as combination immunotherapy and anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody appear to be clinically beneficial option preference.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8534-8534 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. I. Riker ◽  
N. N. Vahanian ◽  
C. J. Link ◽  
L. Tennant ◽  
W. J. Ramsey ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e002121
Author(s):  
Lauren J Brown ◽  
Alison Weppler ◽  
Prachi Bhave ◽  
Clara Allayous ◽  
J. Randall Patrinely Jr ◽  
...  

BackgroundClinical trials of immunotherapy have excluded patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease. While the safety and efficacy of single agent ipilimumab and anti-PD1 antibodies in patients with autoimmune disease has been examined in retrospective studies, no data are available for combination therapy which has significantly higher toxicity risk. We sought to establish the safety and efficacy of combination immunotherapy for patients with advanced melanoma and pre-existing autoimmune diseases.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of patients with advanced melanoma and pre-existing autoimmune disease who received combination ipilimumab and anti-PD1 at 10 international centers from March 2015 to February 2020. Data regarding the autoimmune disease, treatment, toxicity and outcomes were examined in patients.ResultsOf the 55 patients who received ipilimumab and anti-PD1, the median age was 63 years (range 23–83). Forty-six were treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab and nine with ipilimumab and pembrolizumab.Eighteen patients (33%) had a flare of their autoimmune disease including 4 of 7 with rheumatoid arthritis, 3 of 6 with psoriasis, 5 of 10 with inflammatory bowel disease, 3 of 19 with thyroiditis, 1 of 1 with Sjogren’s syndrome, 1 of 1 with polymyalgia and 1 of 1 with Behcet’s syndrome and psoriasis. Eight (44%) patients ceased combination therapy due to flare. Thirty-seven patients (67%) had an unrelated immune-related adverse event (irAE), and 20 (36%) ceased combination immunotherapy due to irAEs. There were no treatment-related deaths. Patients on immunosuppression (OR 4.59; p=0.03) had a higher risk of flare.The overall response rate was 55%, with 77% of responses ongoing. Median progression free survival and overall survival were 10 and 24 months, respectively. Patients on baseline immunosuppression had an overall survival of 11 months (95% CI 3.42 to 18.58) compared with 31 months without (95% CI 20.89 to 41.11, p=0.005).ConclusionsIn patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease, not on immunosuppression and advanced melanoma, combination ipilimumab and anti-PD1 has similar efficacy compared with previously reported trials. There is a risk of flare of pre-existing autoimmune disorders, particularly in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatologic conditions, and patients on baseline immunosuppression.


2008 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
NEIL OSTERWEIL
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 38-39
Author(s):  
Sheetal Malhotra ◽  
Shanaz Sikder ◽  
Elaine Cochran ◽  
Mattingly Megan ◽  
Gorden Phillip ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document