Neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy with ipilimumab (3 mg/kg or 10mg/kg) and high dose IFN-a2b in locally/regionally advanced melanoma.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9585-9585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad A. Tarhini ◽  
Zahra Rahman ◽  
Yan Lin ◽  
Priyanka Vallabhaneni ◽  
Hussein Abdul-Hassan Tawbi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Combination Immunotherapy

scholarly journals CTLA-4 blockade and interferon-α induce proinflammatory transcriptional changes in the tumor immune landscape that correlate with pathologic response in melanoma

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. e0245287
Author(s):  
Arjun Khunger ◽  
Erin Piazza ◽  
Sarah Warren ◽  
Thomas H. Smith ◽  
Xing Ren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Activation ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Pathologic Response ◽  
Interferon Α ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Combination Immunotherapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy ◽  
Study Gene Expression

Patients with locally/regionally advanced melanoma were treated with neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy with high-dose interferon α-2b (HDI) and ipilimumab in a phase I clinical trial. Tumor specimens were obtained prior to the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy, at the time of surgery and progression if available. In this study, gene expression profiles of tumor specimens (N = 27) were investigated using the NanoString nCounter® platform to evaluate associations with clinical outcomes (pathologic response, radiologic response, relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS)) and define biomarkers associated with tumor response. The Tumor Inflammation Signature (TIS), an 18-gene signature that enriches for response to Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) checkpoint blockade, was also evaluated for association with clinical response and survival. It was observed that neoadjuvant ipilimumab-HDI therapy demonstrated an upregulation of immune-related genes, chemokines, and transcription regulator genes involved in immune cell activation, function, or cell proliferation. Importantly, increased expression of baseline pro-inflammatory genes CCL19, CD3D, CD8A, CD22, LY9, IL12RB1, C1S, C7, AMICA1, TIAM1, TIGIT, THY1 was associated with longer OS (p < 0.05). In addition, multiple genes that encode a component or a regulator of the extracellular matrix such as MMP2 and COL1A2 were identified post-treatment as being associated with longer RFS and OS. In all baseline tissues, high TIS scores were associated with longer OS (p = 0.0166). Also, downregulated expression of cell proliferation-related genes such as CUL1, CCND1 and AAMP at baseline was associated with pathological and radiological response (unadjusted p < 0.01). In conclusion, we identified numerous genes that play roles in multiple biological pathways involved in immune activation, immune suppression and cell proliferation correlating with pathological/radiological responses following neoadjuvant immunotherapy highlighting the complexity of immune responses modulated by immunotherapy. Our observations suggest that TIS may be a useful biomarker for predicting survival outcomes with combination immunotherapy.

Combination immunotherapy in management of advanced melanoma

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akhil Kapoor ◽  
Ankita Rungta ◽  
HarvindraSingh Kumar ◽  
Rajesh Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Combination Immunotherapy

scholarly journals Correlation of NRAS Mutations With Clinical Response to High-dose IL-2 in Patients With Advanced Melanoma

2012 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard W. Joseph ◽  
Ryan. J. Sullivan ◽  
Robyn Harrell ◽  
Katherine Stemke-Hale ◽  
David Panka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Response ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
High Dose

Randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of high-dose interleukin-2 in combination with a soluble p75 tumor necrosis factor receptor immunoglobulin G chimera in patients with advanced melanoma and renal cell carcinoma.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 1052-1062 ◽  
Author(s):  
J S Du Bois ◽  
E G Trehu ◽  
J W Mier ◽  
L Shapiro ◽  
M Epstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Tumor Necrosis Factor ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Tumor Necrosis ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Biologic Effects ◽  
Necrosis Factor

PURPOSE A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed to compare the toxicity and biologic effects of treatment with high-dose intravenous (IV) bolus interleukin-2 (IL-2) plus the recombinant human soluble p75 tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor immunoglobulin G (IgG) chimera (rhuTNFR:Fc) with high-dose IL-2 alone in patients with advanced melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty patients with advanced melanoma or renal cell carcinoma were randomized to receive IL-2 (Chiron, Emeryville, CA) 600,000 IU/kg every 8 hours on days 1 to 5 and 15 to 19 (maximum, 28 doses) combined with placebo or the rhuTNFR:Fc fusion protein (Immunex, Seattle, WA) 10 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 and 5 mg/m2 on days 3, 5, 17, and 19. The impact of rhuTNFR:Fc on IL-2 toxicity and biologic effects was evaluated. RESULTS No clinically significant difference in toxicity was observed in the two treatment arms. The adjusted median number of IL-2 doses administered during cycle 1 was 24.5 (range, seven to 28) and 21.5 (range, five to 27) for the placebo and rhuTNFR:Fc arms, respectively (P = .544). IL-2-induced TNF bioactivity, neutrophil chemotactic defect, and serum IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) induction were suppressed by rhuTNFR:Fc. Two of nine assessable patients (22%) on IL-2/placebo and three of 10 patients (30%) on IL-2/rhuTNFR:Fc responded. CONCLUSION Despite evidence of in vitro neutralization of TNF functional activity and partial inhibition of other secondary biologic effects of IL-2, rhuTNFR:Fc does not reduce the clinical toxicity associated with high-dose IL-2 therapy. These results suggest that the toxicity and antitumor effects of IL-2 treatment are independent of circulating TNF.

scholarly journals High-Dose Ipilimumab and High-Dose Interleukin-2 for Patients With Advanced Melanoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann W. Silk ◽  
Howard L. Kaufman ◽  
Brendan Curti ◽  
Janice M. Mehnert ◽  
Kim Margolin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
High Dose

scholarly journals Three Phase II Cytokine Working Group Trials of gp100 (210M) Peptide Plus High-Dose Interleukin-2 in Patients With HLA-A2–Positive Advanced Melanoma

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (14) ◽  
pp. 2292-2298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Sosman ◽  
Carole Carrillo ◽  
Walter J. Urba ◽  
Lawrence Flaherty ◽  
Michael B. Atkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Cell Immunity ◽  
Three Phase

Purpose High-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) induces responses in 15% to 20% of patients with advanced melanoma; 5% to 8% are durable complete responses (CRs). The HLA-A2–restricted, modified gp100 peptide (210M) induces T-cell immunity in vivo and has little antitumor activity but, combined with high-dose IL-2, reportedly has a 42% (13 of 31 patients) response rate (RR). We evaluated 210M with one of three different IL-2 schedules to determine whether a basis exists for a phase III trial. Patients and Methods In three separate phase II trials, patients with melanoma received 210M subcutaneously during weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10 and standard high-dose IL-2 during weeks 1 and 3 (trial 1), weeks 7 and 9 (trial 2), or weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10 (trial 3). Immune assays were performed on peripheral-blood mononuclear cells collected before and after treatment. Results From 1998 to 2003, 131 patients with HLA-A2–positive were enrolled. With 60-month median follow-up time, the overall RR for 121 assessable patients was 16.5% (95% CI, 10% to 26%); the RRs were 23.8% in trial 1 (42 patients), 12.5% in trial 2 (40 patients), and 12.8% in trial 3 (39 patients). There were 11 CRs (9%) and nine partial responses (7%), with 11 patients (9%) progression free at ≥ 30 months. Immune studies including assays of CD3-ζ expression and numbers of CD4+/CD25+/FoxP3+ regulatory T cells, CD15+/CD11b+/CD14– immature myeloid-derived cells, and CD8+gp100 tetramer-positive cells in the blood did not correlate with clinical benefit. Conclusion The results again demonstrate efficacy of high-dose IL-2 in advanced melanoma but did not demonstrate the promising clinical activity reported with vaccine and high-dose IL-2 in any of three phase II trials.

A single center experience with high-dose (HD) IL-2 treatment for patients with advanced melanoma and pilot investigation of a novel gene expression signature as a predictor of response

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9003-9003 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Sullivan ◽  
Y. Hoshida ◽  
J. Brunet ◽  
S. Tahan ◽  
J. Aldridge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Gene Expression Signature ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Immune Genes ◽  
Expression Signature ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Class 1

9003 Background: HD IL-2 remains one of two FDA-approved therapies for the treatment of patients (pts) with advanced melanoma. Initial studies conducted 15–20 years ago reported 16% response rate with 8% of pts achieving durable responses. The toxicity of HD IL-2 limits its application to pts treated in specialized centers. We present the clinical outcome of pts treated over a recent 2 year period with HD IL-2 at a single institution and an associated retrospective pilot study evaluating the predictive value of a novel tumor gene expression signature. Methods: Clinical and radiological data were collected and analyzed on 49 consecutive pts treated with HD IL-2 at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center from 10/05 - 10/07. Response was evaluated via RECIST. Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumor was obtained on consenting pts and classified as either Class 1, defined by melanocyte-specific genes including MITF, or Class 2, represented by immune genes, using the DNA-mediated Annealing, Selection, and Ligation (DASL) technique. Two-sided Fisher's Exact test was used to compare the proportion of responses for pts in the two classes. Results: Clinical response occurred in 16 of the 49 pts (32.6%), with 5 pts (10.2%) having a CR. Two other pts had stable disease > 12 mos; 3 pts who progressed after response had resection to NED. 10 pts remain disease/progression free at a minimum of 16 mos following treatment. 28 pts (including 13 of 16 responders) had sufficient tumor for DASL analysis. Among the 21 categorized as Class 1, 7 (33%) were responders. Of the 7 classified as Class 2, 6 (86%) were responders. This difference in response was statistically significant (p = 0.0286). Conclusions: The overall and CR rates in a contemporary series of pts with metastatic melanoma treated with HD IL-2 are twice that reported in initial studies suggesting some treatment selection on clinical grounds since the 1990s. Pts with tumors expressing an immune signature by DASL appeared more likely to respond. This finding requires prospective validation, but suggests immune-related gene expression might contribute to IL-2 responsiveness. [Table: see text]

High-dose interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) in the treatment of advanced melanoma: The University of Pittsburgh experience.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9075-9075
Author(s):  
Diwakar Davar ◽  
Melissa Saul ◽  
Ahmad A. Tarhini ◽  
An Tran ◽  
Kerry Trent ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
University Of Pittsburgh ◽  
Radiological Data

9075 Background: IL-2 is a T-cell growth factor tested in a variety of regimens for advanced melanoma (MEL) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). High-dose IL-2 (600,000-720,000 IU/kg administered intravenously every 8 hours for up to 14 consecutive doses) was approved by FDA for advanced MEL and RCC in 1998 based upon the durability of responses observed. Early studies of HD IL-2 reported overall (OR) and complete response (CR) rates of 16% and 8% respectively. Severe toxicity limited use to specialized centers with standardized protocols, either intensive care (ICU) or oncology specialty settings. The U Pittsburgh has treated 1022 patients with IL-2 at any dosage and we here present outcomes of 550 MEL pts treated with HD IL-2 in an oncology specialty non-ICU setting. Methods: Clinical and radiological data were collected on all pts treated with IL-2 using the UPCI Cancer Registry and Medical Archival System (MARS). Pharmacy records were reviewed for dosing details. The influence of baseline characteristics on treatment outcomes was assessed using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Results: A total of 848 pts received HD IL-2, of which 298 pts had RCC while 550 had MEL. Detailed pharmacy dosing records were reviewed from 176 pts treated over the past 12 years (2000-2012) who received a total of 3738 cycles. Of 165 pts evaluable for response, OR was documented in 24 pts (14.8%) and CR in 5 pts (3.0%). Median overall survival (OS) was 10.0 mos for all patients and 21.5 mos for responders (CR+PR). Median number of doses per cycle was 7. Toxicity was consistent with prior reports. HD IL-2 required ICU transfers in 5% and 1 death was attributed to HD IL-2. Pts with higher baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) had poorer OS (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In this large and uniformly treated series of recent patients treated with IL-2 OR/CR rates with HD IL-2 are 14.8% and 3.0% respectively. Higher LDH is associated with poorer outcome. Biomarkers of response are currently being evaluated in banked clinical specimens collected from patients under the SPORE in Skin Cancer (P50 CA121973).

scholarly journals Lifileucel, a Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Therapy, in Metastatic Melanoma

2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.21.00612
Author(s):  
Amod A. Sarnaik ◽  
Omid Hamid ◽  
Nikhil I. Khushalani ◽  
Karl D. Lewis ◽  
Theresa Medina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Control ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Disease Control Rate ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocyte ◽  
Programmed Death

PURPOSE Effective treatment options are limited for patients with advanced (metastatic or unresectable) melanoma who progress after immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies. Adoptive cell therapy using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes has demonstrated efficacy in advanced melanoma. Lifileucel is an autologous, centrally manufactured tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte product. METHODS We conducted a phase II open-label, single-arm, multicenter study in patients with advanced melanoma who had been previously treated with checkpoint inhibitor(s) and BRAF ± MEK targeted agents. Lifileucel was produced from harvested tumor specimens in central Good Manufacturing Practice facilities using a streamlined 22-day process. Patients received a nonmyeloablative lymphodepletion regimen, a single infusion of lifileucel, and up to six doses of high-dose interleukin-2. The primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST, version 1.1. RESULTS Sixty-six patients received a mean of 3.3 prior therapies (anti–programmed death 1 [PD-1] or programmed death ligand 1 [PD-L1]: 100%; anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4: 80%; BRAF ± MEK inhibitor: 23%). The ORR was 36% (95% CI, 25 to 49), with two complete responses and 22 partial responses. Disease control rate was 80% (95% CI, 69 to 89). Median duration of response was not reached after 18.7-month median study follow-up (range, 0.2-34.1 months). In the primary refractory to anti–PD-1 or PD-L1 therapy subset, the ORR and disease control rate were 41% (95% CI, 26 to 57) and 81% (95% CI, 66 to 91), respectively. Safety profile was consistent with known adverse events associated with nonmyeloablative lymphodepletion and interleukin-2. CONCLUSION Lifileucel demonstrated durable responses and addresses a major unmet need in patients with metastatic melanoma with limited treatment options after approved therapy, including the primary refractory to anti–PD-1 or PD-L1 therapy subset.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document