The COAST stroke advance directive

Within the field of neurology, there has been limited discussion of how to best respect patient autonomy in patients presenting with an acute stroke, who often have impairments in language and cognition. In addition to performing a detailed neurologic examination and providing a thorough timeline of their current presentation and medical history, these patients and their families are then asked to quickly make critical medical decisions regarding acute stroke therapies (thrombolysis and endovascular therapy). These discussions are often limited by time constraints and inadequate opportunities for patient education regarding acute stroke care. This article discusses some of the challenges of preserving patient autonomy in patients presenting with acute stroke and the advent of a stroke advance directive (Coordinating Options for Acute Stroke Therapy [COAST]) aimed to overcome these obstacles.

Download Full-text

Abstract P284: Coordinating Options for Acute Stroke Therapy (COAST): Demonstrating Patient Autonomy by Examining Preferences for Acute Stroke Treatment From a Stroke Advance Directive

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p284 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Kunal Agrawal ◽

Ilana Spokoyny ◽

Chia-Chun Chiang ◽

Kevin McGehrin ◽

Brett C Meyer

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Advance Directive ◽

Patient Autonomy ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Stroke Therapy ◽

Stroke Treatment ◽

Fda Approval ◽

Acute Stroke Treatment ◽

Current Guidelines ◽

Acute Stroke Therapy

Introduction: Respect for patient autonomy is critical, and patients/surrogates may have various preferences about acute stroke treatment that are not fully appreciated during a stroke code. COAST (Coordinating Options for Acute Stroke Therapy) is a stroke advance directive formalizing advanced consent for thrombolysis (tPA) and endovascular therapy (EVT). We examine the distribution of patient preferences to improve understanding and respect for patient autonomy in acute stroke. Methods: In our IRB-approved study, we collected COAST forms at UC San Diego from 12/1/2014-2/29/2020. Patients chose one of five tPA preferences: not under any circumstance (tPA 1); up to 3 hours only, based on FDA approval (tPA 2); up to 4.5 hours only, based on current guidelines (tPA 3); anytime per provider discretion (tPA 4); or other answer (tPA treatment under specific conditions written by the patient/surrogate) (tPA 5). Patients also chose one of five EVT preferences: not under any circumstance (EVT 1); up to 6 hours only (EVT 2); up to 12 hours only (EVT 3); up to 24 hours only (this option replaced "up to 12 hours only" on 3/1/2018 when the 6-24 hour window became standard of care) (EVT 4); anytime at provider discretion (EVT 5); or other answer (EVT treatment under specific conditions written by the patient/surrogate) (EVT 6). Frequency of preferences was calculated for each option. Results: In total, 342 COASTs were completed. Frequency of tPA preferences were: 3.2% for tPA 1 (11/342), 1.5% for tPA 2 (5/342), 25.7% for tPA 3 (88/342), 55.6% for tPA 4 (190/342), 14.0% for tPA 5 (48/342). Frequency of EVT preferences were: 1.8% for EVT 1 (6/342), 9.6% for EVT 2 (33/342), 3.2% for EVT 3 (11/342), 10.8% for EVT 4 (37/342), 62.3% for EVT 5 (213/342), 12.3% for EVT 6 (42/342). When the 6-24 hour window became standard of care, 0% (0/342) chose EVT 2. Total 81.6% (n=279) of COASTs had the same tPA and EVT preferences, and 18.4% (n=63) had tPA preferences that were different from EVT preferences. Conclusion: Preferences vary regarding tPA and EVT treatment. Most patients defer to provider discretion, though some patients have preferences that are different from current provider expectations and/or stroke guidelines. COAST is pivotal to inform respect for patient autonomy for acute stroke codes.

Download Full-text

Abstract TP259: Accuracy of EMS Identification of Acute Strokes Eligible for tPA Treatment in Kaiser Stroke EXPRESS Program

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.48.suppl_1.tp259 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Jeffrey G Klingman ◽

Sunil Bhopale ◽

Meghan Hatfield ◽

Benjamin Wilson ◽

Lauren Klingman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Work Flow ◽

Initial Assessment ◽

Stroke Therapy ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Kaiser Permanente ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Stroke Mimic

Background: Field-based diversion for potential stroke patients who may qualify for endovascular stroke therapy (EST) has been proposed more widely in 2015. In 2015, Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) redesigned its acute stroke care work flow for all its 21 stroke centers, which included rapid evaluation of all stroke alerts by a stroke neurologist via teleneurology. We investigated the accuracy of EMS-activated stroke alerts. Methods: From 1/1/16 to 7/10/16, all acute strokes presenting to an ED between 7 AM and midnight were assessed upon arrival by a teleneurologist. We reviewed all telestroke cases to determine the frequency of tPA given, cancelled stroke alerts, and the reasons for not treating with IV t-PA, particularly among ambulance arrivals. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess age, gender, race, Kaiser membership, and mode of ED arrival as predictors of stroke alert cancellation. Results: There were 2192 stroke alerts activated. Of these, 1332 (60.7%) arrived by EMS and 860 (39.2%) by non-EMS transport. Of patients arriving by EMS, 651 (48.9%) were cancelled and deemed ineligible for IV t-PA. Most common reasons for cancellation were: last time known well (LTKW) out of range (23%), stroke mimic (33%), symptom resolution (19%), new data regarding goals of care (2%), and other (22.5%). The remaining 681 (51.1%) ambulance arrivals were potential candidates for IV tPA. Subsequently, 334 (50.4%) of them received tPA. Reasons for tPA not given included subsequent resolution of symptoms, concerning CT findings (such as bleed), INR>1.7 in patients on warfarin, further information clarifying time of onset. Among those who arrived by EMS and received IV t-PA, all had CTA and 103 (30.8%) were found to have a large vessel occlusion and 74 (71.8%) underwent EST. In multivariate analysis for all cancelled stroke alerts, arrival by non-EMS transport (OR=1.74, 95% CI 1.44-2.10, p<0.001) was more likely to be cancelled. Conclusions: Close to half of EMS-activated stroke alerts were cancelled upon initial assessment. Only 5% of patients initially identified by EMS as having a potential acute stroke ultimately underwent EST. Better determination of LTKW and stroke symptoms would improve the accuracy of EMS-initiated stroke alerts.

Download Full-text

Ongoing Improvement in Acute Ischemic Stroke Therapy Per Concurrent Guidelines and Easily Implementable Quality Improvement Protocol

Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery ◽

10.31579/2578-8868/184 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (6) ◽

pp. 01-09

Author(s):

Wengui Yu

Keyword(s):

Quality Improvement ◽

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Linear Regression Models ◽

Stroke Therapy ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Stroke Registry ◽

Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator

Background: Despite proven efficacy of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke, there has been slow administration of these therapies in the real world practice. We examined the ongoing quality improvement in acute stroke care at our comprehensive stroke center. Methods: Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke from 2013 to 2018 were studied. Patients were managed using Code Stroke algorithm per concurrent AHA guidelines and a simple quality improvement protocol implemented in 2015. Demographics and clinical data were collected from Get-With-The-Guideline-Stroke registry and electronic medical records. Patients were divided into 3 groups per admission and implementation date of quality improvement initiatives. Quality measures, including rates of intravenous tPA and EVT, door-to-needle (DTN) time, and door-to-puncture (DTP) time, were analyzed with general mean linear regression models and Jonckheere-Terpstra test. Results: Of the 1,369 eligible patients presenting within 24 hours of symptom onset or wakeup stroke, the rate of intravenous tPA was 20%, 30% and 22%, respectively, in 2013-2014, 2015-2016, and 2017-2018. In contrast, EVT rate was 9%, 14% and 15%, respectively. Based on Jonckheere-Terpstra test, there was significant ongoing improvement in the median DTN time (57, 45, 39 minutes; p < 0.001) and DTP time (172, 130, 114 minutes; p =0.009) during the 3 time periods, with DTN time ≤ 60 and ≤45 minutes in 80% and 63% patients, respectively, in 2017-2018. Conclusions: Getting with the guidelines and simple quality improvement initiatives are associated with satisfactory rates of acute stroke therapy and ongoing improvement in door to treatment times.

Download Full-text

Mission Thrombectomy 2020 (MT2020)—India’s Biggest Healthcare Challenge Yet

Journal of Stroke Medicine ◽

10.1177/2516608520984276 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 3 (2) ◽

pp. 62-71

Author(s):

Kaushik Sundar ◽

Ajay Panwar ◽

Dileep R. Yagaval ◽

Vikram Huded ◽

P.N. Sylaja

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Health Benefit ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Large Contribution ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Stroke Outcomes ◽

Mortality And Morbidity ◽

Political Economic ◽

Acute Stroke Therapy

Large vessel occlusion has a disproportionately large contribution to overall mortality and morbidity from stroke. The Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology in the year 2016 announced the launch of Mission Thrombectomy 2020 (MT2020), with the aim of increasing access to stroke thrombectomy globally. Despite 4 years since the start of MT2020, India is falling short in acute stroke therapy including thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Access to timely MT leads to substantial mitigation of adverse stroke outcomes. This in turn leads to an enormous health benefit in that population. MT as a treatment is unevenly and unfairly distributed and increasing access to it is in need of strategies targeting political, economic, and environmental factors. Such strategies are slowly being adopted. In this article, we attempt to look at the major hurdles we face in improving acute stroke care in our country and we also explore options to address them.

Download Full-text

Berlin PRehospital Or Usual Delivery of Acute Stroke Care 2.0 (B_PROUD 2.0)

Case Medical Research ◽

10.31525/ct1-nct03931616 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care

Download Full-text

Essential Acute Stroke Care in Low Resource Settings: a Pilot studY

Case Medical Research ◽

10.31525/ct1-nct04157231 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Keyword(s):

Pilot Study ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Low Resource Settings ◽

Low Resource

Download Full-text

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Provision of acute stroke care and associated factors in a multiethnic population: prospective study with the South London Stroke Register.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature ◽

10.3410/f.8785964.9312066 ◽

2011 ◽

Author(s):

Erik Buskens

Keyword(s):

Prospective Study ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Associated Factors ◽

Stroke Care ◽

The South ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Multiethnic Population ◽

Stroke Register

Download Full-text

Bottlenecks in the Acute Stroke Care System during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Catalonia

Cerebrovascular Diseases ◽

10.1159/000516309 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

Anna Ramos-Pachón ◽

Álvaro García-Tornel ◽

Mònica Millán ◽

Marc Ribó ◽

Sergi Amaro ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Functional Outcome ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Care Quality ◽

Point Of View ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Prehospital Delays ◽

The Impact

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant healthcare reorganizations, potentially striking standard medical care. We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute stroke care quality and clinical outcomes to detect healthcare system’s bottlenecks from a territorial point of view. Methods: Crossed-data analysis between a prospective nation-based mandatory registry of acute stroke, Emergency Medical System (EMS) records, and daily incidence of COVID-19 in Catalonia (Spain). We included all stroke code activations during the pandemic (March 15–May 2, 2020) and an immediate prepandemic period (January 26–March 14, 2020). Primary outcomes were stroke code activations and reperfusion therapies in both periods. Secondary outcomes included clinical characteristics, workflow metrics, differences across types of stroke centers, correlation analysis between weekly EMS alerts, COVID-19 cases, and workflow metrics, and impact on mortality and clinical outcome at 90 days. Results: Stroke code activations decreased by 22% and reperfusion therapies dropped by 29% during the pandemic period, with no differences in age, stroke severity, or large vessel occlusion. Calls to EMS were handled 42 min later, and time from onset to hospital arrival increased by 53 min, with significant correlations between weekly COVID-19 cases and more EMS calls (rho = 0.81), less stroke code activations (rho = −0.37), and longer prehospital delays (rho = 0.25). Telestroke centers were afflicted with higher reductions in stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, referrals to endovascular centers, and increased delays to thrombolytics. The independent odds of death increased (OR 1.6 [1.05–2.4], p 0.03) and good functional outcome decreased (mRS ≤2 at 90 days: OR 0.6 [0.4–0.9], p 0.015) during the pandemic period. Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Catalonia’s stroke system’s weakest points were the delay to EMS alert and a decline of stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, and interhospital transfers, mostly at local centers. Patients suffering an acute stroke during the pandemic period had higher odds of poor functional outcome and death. The complete stroke care system’s analysis is crucial to allocate resources appropriately.

Download Full-text

Acute Stroke Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Reduction in the Number of Admissions of Elderly Patients and Increase in Prehospital Delays

Cerebrovascular Diseases ◽

10.1159/000514140 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

Gabriel Velilla-Alonso ◽

Andrés García-Pastor ◽

Ángela Rodríguez-López ◽

Ana Gómez-Roldós ◽

Antonio Sánchez-Soblechero ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Elderly Patients ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Time Course ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Group Data ◽

Radiological Data ◽

History Of ◽

Prehospital Delays

Introduction: We analyzed whether the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis affected acute stroke care in our center during the first 2 months of lockdown in Spain. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective study. We collected demographic, clinical, and radiological data; time course; and treatment of patients meeting the stroke unit admission criteria from March 14 to May 14, 2020 (COVID-19 period group). Data were compared with the same period in 2019 (pre-COVID-19 period group). Results: 195 patients were analyzed; 83 in the COVID-19 period group, resulting in a 26% decline of acute strokes and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) admitted to our center compared with the previous year (p = 0.038). Ten patients (12%) tested positive for PCR SARS-CoV-2. The proportion of patients aged 65 years and over was lower in the COVID-19 period group (53 vs. 68.8%, p = 0.025). During the pandemic period, analyzed patients were more frequently smokers (27.7 vs. 10.7%, p = 0.002) and had less frequently history of prior stroke (13.3 vs. 25%, p = 0.043) or atrial fibrillation (9.6 vs. 25%, p = 0.006). ASPECTS score was lower (9 [7–10] vs. 10 [8–10], p = 0.032), NIHSS score was slightly higher (5 [2–14] vs. 4 [2–8], p = 0.122), onset-to-door time was higher (304 [93–760] vs. 197 [91.25–645] min, p = 0.104), and a lower proportion arrived within 4.5 h from onset of symptoms (43.4 vs. 58%, p = 0.043) during the COVID-19 period. There were no differences between proportion of patients receiving recanalization treatment (intravenous thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy) and in-hospital delays. Conclusion: We observed a reduction in the number of acute strokes and TIAs admitted during the COVID-19 period. This drop affected especially elderly patients, and despite a delay in their arrival to the emergency department, the proportion of patients treated with recanalization therapies was preserved.

Download Full-text