scholarly journals On the optimal stopping problems with monotone thresholds

2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 926-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsushi Tamaki

As a class of optimal stopping problems with monotone thresholds, we define the candidate-choice problem (CCP) and derive two formulae for calculating its expected payoff. We apply the first formula to a particular CCP, i.e. the best-choice duration problem treated by Ferguson et al. (1992). The recall case is also examined as a comparison. We also derive the distribution of the stopping time of the CCP and find, as a by-product, that the best-choice problem has a remarkable feature in that the optimal probability of choosing the best is just the expected value of the (proportional) stopping time. The similarity between the best-choice duration problem and the best-choice problem with uniform freeze studied by Samuel-Cahn (1996) is recognized.

2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (04) ◽  
pp. 926-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsushi Tamaki

As a class of optimal stopping problems with monotone thresholds, we define the candidate-choice problem (CCP) and derive two formulae for calculating its expected payoff. We apply the first formula to a particular CCP, i.e. the best-choice duration problem treated by Ferguson et al. (1992). The recall case is also examined as a comparison. We also derive the distribution of the stopping time of the CCP and find, as a by-product, that the best-choice problem has a remarkable feature in that the optimal probability of choosing the best is just the expected value of the (proportional) stopping time. The similarity between the best-choice duration problem and the best-choice problem with uniform freeze studied by Samuel-Cahn (1996) is recognized.


2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 726-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsushi Tamaki

Abstract The best-choice problem and the duration problem, known as versions of the secretary problem, are concerned with choosing an object from those that appear sequentially. Let (B,p) denote the best-choice problem and (D,p) the duration problem when the total number N of objects is a bounded random variable with prior p=(p1, p2,...,pn) for a known upper bound n. Gnedin (2005) discovered the correspondence relation between these two quite different optimal stopping problems. That is, for any given prior p, there exists another prior q such that (D,p) is equivalent to (B,q). In this paper, motivated by his discovery, we attempt to find the alternate correspondence {p(m),m≥0}, i.e. an infinite sequence of priors such that (D,p(m-1)) is equivalent to (B,p(m)) for all m≥1, starting with p(0)=(0,...,0,1). To be more precise, the duration problem is distinguished into (D1,p) or (D2,p), referred to as model 1 or model 2, depending on whether the planning horizon is N or n. The aforementioned problem is model 1. For model 2 as well, we can find the similar alternate correspondence {p[m],m≥ 0}. We treat both the no-information model and the full-information model and examine the limiting behaviors of their optimal rules and optimal values related to the alternate correspondences as n→∞. A generalization of the no-information model is given. It is worth mentioning that the alternate correspondences for model 1 and model 2 are respectively related to the urn sampling models without replacement and with replacement.


2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (04) ◽  
pp. 1086-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsushi Tamaki

The problem we consider here is a full-information best-choice problem in which n applicants appear sequentially, but each applicant refuses an offer independently of other applicants with known fixed probability 0≤q<1. The objective is to maximize the probability of choosing the best available applicant. Two models are distinguished according to when the availability can be ascertained; the availability is ascertained just after the arrival of the applicant (Model 1), whereas the availability can be ascertained only when an offer is made (Model 2). For Model 1, we can obtain the explicit expressions for the optimal stopping rule and the optimal probability for a given n. A remarkable feature of this model is that, asymptotically (i.e. n→∞), the optimal probability becomes insensitive to q and approaches 0.580 164. The planar Poisson process (PPP) model provides more insight into this phenomenon. For Model 2, the optimal stopping rule depends on the past history in a complicated way and seems to be intractable. We have not solved this model for a finite n but derive, via the PPP approach, a lower bound on the asymptotically optimal probability.


2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 1086-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsushi Tamaki

The problem we consider here is a full-information best-choice problem in which n applicants appear sequentially, but each applicant refuses an offer independently of other applicants with known fixed probability 0≤q<1. The objective is to maximize the probability of choosing the best available applicant. Two models are distinguished according to when the availability can be ascertained; the availability is ascertained just after the arrival of the applicant (Model 1), whereas the availability can be ascertained only when an offer is made (Model 2). For Model 1, we can obtain the explicit expressions for the optimal stopping rule and the optimal probability for a given n. A remarkable feature of this model is that, asymptotically (i.e. n→∞), the optimal probability becomes insensitive to q and approaches 0.580 164. The planar Poisson process (PPP) model provides more insight into this phenomenon. For Model 2, the optimal stopping rule depends on the past history in a complicated way and seems to be intractable. We have not solved this model for a finite n but derive, via the PPP approach, a lower bound on the asymptotically optimal probability.


1997 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Graversen ◽  
G. Peškir

The solution is presented to all optimal stopping problems of the form supτE(G(|Β τ |) – cτ), where is standard Brownian motion and the supremum is taken over all stopping times τ for B with finite expectation, while the map G : ℝ+ → ℝ satisfies for some being given and fixed. The optimal stopping time is shown to be the hitting time by the reflecting Brownian motion of the set of all (approximate) maximum points of the map . The method of proof relies upon Wald's identity for Brownian motion and simple real analysis arguments. A simple proof of the Dubins–Jacka–Schwarz–Shepp–Shiryaev (square root of two) maximal inequality for randomly stopped Brownian motion is given as an application.


2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (01) ◽  
pp. 102-113
Author(s):  
Albrecht Irle

We consider the optimal stopping problem for g(Z n ), where Z n , n = 1, 2, …, is a homogeneous Markov sequence. An algorithm, called forward improvement iteration, is presented by which an optimal stopping time can be computed. Using an iterative step, this algorithm computes a sequence B 0 ⊇ B 1 ⊇ B 2 ⊇ · · · of subsets of the state space such that the first entrance time into the intersection F of these sets is an optimal stopping time. Various applications are given.


1983 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph D. Petruccelli

We consider the problem of maximizing the probability of choosing the largest from a sequence of N observations when N is a bounded random variable. The present paper gives a necessary and sufficient condition, based on the distribution of N, for the optimal stopping rule to have a particularly simple form: what Rasmussen and Robbins (1975) call an s(r) rule. A second result indicates that optimal stopping rules for this problem can, with one restriction, take virtually any form.


1974 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 294-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman Starr

Independent exponential capture times are assumed for each of N prey. The payoff is the number of prey caught less a linear time cost. The optimal stopping time and value are obtained. When N is known an adaptive statistical procedure is proposed for which the expected payoff differs from the value by at most one-half plus a term which tends to zero (of order N–α, a < 1) as N → ∞.


1984 ◽  
Vol 16 (01) ◽  
pp. 111-130
Author(s):  
Joseph D. Petruccelli

From one point of view this paper adds to a previous formulation of the best-choice problem (Petruccelli (1981)) the possibility that the number of available observations, rather than being known, is a bounded random variable N with known distribution. From another perspective, it expands the formulations of Presman and Sonin (1972) and Rasmussen and Robbins (1975) to include recall and uncertainty of selection of observations. The behaviour of optimal stopping rules is examined under various assumptions on the general model. For optimal stopping rules and their probabilities of best choice relations are obtained between the bounded and unbounded N cases. Two particular classes of stopping rules which generalize the s(r) rules of Rasmussen and Robbins (1975) are considered in detail.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document