scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Is Associated with Improved Survival Compared with Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Only after Complete Pathologic Response

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 253-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla S. Fisher ◽  
Cynthia X. Ma ◽  
William E. Gillanders ◽  
Rebecca L. Aft ◽  
Timothy J. Eberlein ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 07 (02) ◽  
pp. 156-158
Author(s):  
G. S. Bhattacharyya ◽  
M. Walia ◽  
M. Nandi ◽  
A. Murli ◽  
S. Salim ◽  
...  

AbstractThis manuscript provides a practical and easy to use consensus recommendation to community oncologists on how to use neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer patients.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Roselin Nittala ◽  
Satyaseelan Packianathan ◽  
Gary L. Shultz ◽  
Paul Roberts ◽  
Eswar K. Mundra ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (estrogen receptor (ER) – negative, progesterone receptor (PR) - negative, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -negative) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer that is more common in younger women, carries a poorer prognosis and has a greater metastatic potential than receptor positive subtypes. Radiation therapy’s ability to improve outcomes, especially the overall survival is controversial, more so among African American patients. The objective of this study is to evaluate local control and survival rates of TNBC patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) in our institution with a sizeable cohort of African American women. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of 67 TNBCs (2007–2017) at an academic state institution who underwent a lumpectomy and /or mastectomy (surgery) followed by adjuvant irradiation to a median total dose of 50 Gy (range 40.5–50.40 Gy). Chemotherapy was administered in a neoadjuvant (32) or adjuvant setting (35). For all 67 TNBCs, local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The significance of survival variables was analyzed using the Cox univariate and multivariate proportional hazards model. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The SPSS 24.0 software was used for data analysis. Results The baseline characteristics of all 67 TNBCs were measured with median follow up of 58 months (range 10–142 months). Patients were stratified into two groups (neoadjuvant chemotherapy-RT (32) vs. adjuvant chemotherapy-RT (35)). The five-year rates for LC, DFS and OS were 14.8 % vs. 47.9 % (p = 0.002), 24.2% vs. 53.1 % (p = 0.015), and 65.1% vs. 92.2% (0.002) respectively. On Cox multivariate analysis, patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with statistically improved significant LC (p = 0.002) and OS (p = 0.002). The variables included were: BMI (p = 0.050), distance travelled (p = 0.027), 8th AJCC TNM staging (p = 0.018) and tumor grade (p = 0.022). Conclusion In this hypothesis-generating report, among TNBC patients undergoing RT, adjuvant chemotherapy appears to be better than neoadjuvant chemotherapy in determining the clinical outcomes.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 500-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Bao ◽  
Nicholas Borja ◽  
Madhu Rao ◽  
James Huth ◽  
A. Marilyn Leitch ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS598-TPS598
Author(s):  
Pier Franco Conte ◽  
Maria Vittoria Dieci ◽  
Giancarlo Bisagni ◽  
Michelino De Laurentiis ◽  
Carlo Alberto Tondini ◽  
...  

TPS598 Background: Chemotherapy represents, today, the only treatment option for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and still a considerable proportion of pts with primary TNBC experience disease relapse. The risk is particularly high in the presence of poor prognostic features, such as more advanced stage and, for pts treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, failure to achieve a pCR. Recent evidence suggest that immunotherapy can play a major role in TNBC pts. Methods: The A-BRAVE trial is an investigator-driven trial sponsored by the University of Padova (Dept. of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology). This is a phase III, multicentric, randomized adjuvant study that compares 1 year of treatment with the anti PD-L1 avelumab vs observation for pts who completed treatment with radical intent for primary TNBC including surgery and chemotherapy. The study enrolls pts in two strata: -Stratum A: primary TNBC pts who completed surgery followed by adjuvant, defined according to one of the following stage categories: if pN2, any pT; if pN1, pT > 2 cm; if pN0, pT > 5 cm. -Stratum B: primary TNBC pts who completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery who did not achieve pCR. Pts who also received additional adjuvant chemotherapy for no more than 6 months are eligible in Stratum B, after the completion of the adjuvant chemotherapy. Pts are randomized (1:1, balanced for strata A and B) to receive Avelumab 10 mg/kg I.V. q2w for 1 year or to observation. The first and second co-primary endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS) in all pts and DFS in Stratum B pts. With a planned sample size of n = 474 pts the trial has 90% power to detect a HR = 0.60 for the first co-primary endpoint (n = 172 events required). Taking into account that the percentage of patients enrolled in the stratum B could range from 70 to 80%, there will be 70-79% power to detect a HR = 0.60 at alpha allocated in this patient subgroup (second co-primary endpoint). Secondary objectives include: DFS in PD-L1 positive pts, overall survival, safety, biomarkers. Tumor tissue, plasma samples and fecal samples are collected for biomarker analysis. The study is currently recruiting across 73 sites in Italy and UK. As of February 2020, n = 349 pts have been enrolled. EUDRACT 2016‐000189‐45. The authors present the A-BRAVE trial in progress on behalf of Italian and UK investigators. Clinical trial information: NCT02926196 .


2019 ◽  
Vol 476 (4) ◽  
pp. 569-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruna Cerbelli ◽  
Andrea Botticelli ◽  
Annalinda Pisano ◽  
Angelina Pernazza ◽  
Domenico Campagna ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kartik Anand ◽  
Tejal Patel ◽  
Polly Niravath ◽  
Angel Rodriguez ◽  
Jorge Darcourt ◽  
...  

AbstractTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients who do not achieve pathologic complete response post neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a poor prognosis. Alteration in PI3K/mTOR plus DNA repair pathways are some of the major mechanisms of chemotherapy resistance. We designed an open-label phase II clinical trial to evaluate if the combination of everolimus (mTOR inhibitor) plus cisplatin (interferes with DNA function) will improve the rate of pathologic response, as assessed by residual cancer burden (RCB). Twenty-four Stage II/III TNBC patients with residual cancer > 1 cm post neoadjuvant anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients received everolimus daily orally at 10 mg for 12 weeks and cisplatin IV at 20 mg/m2 weekly for 4 cycles (21-day cycle), until definitive surgery. The primary endpoint was the rate of RCB-0-I at the surgery. The median age of the whole cohort was 50.1 years, with 66.7% non-Hispanic Caucasians. Of the 24 patients enrolled, 22 were included in the efficacy analysis. Twenty-one patients underwent definitive surgery while one patient developed distant metastasis. Five patients had RCB-I at surgery, a response rate of 23% (5/22). Patients with germline PALB2 mutation or somatic PI3KCA mutation had a pathologic response, achieving RCB-I at the surgery. Three patients had metaplastic histology achieving RCB-I at the surgery. Estimated OS at 1 year was 100% in the RCB-I group vs. 76.5% in others, which was not statistically significant due to the small sample size. Certain cohorts including PALB2 germline mutation carrier and somatic PI3KCA mutations warrant further investigation.Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01931163. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01931163.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document