Preoperative Tumor Markers Independently Predict Survival in Stage III Gastric Cancer Patients: Should We Include Tumor Markers in AJCC Staging?

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 2703-2712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-Xian Lin ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Jun-Peng Lin ◽  
Jian-Wei Xie ◽  
Jia-bin Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Markers ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Ajcc Staging ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

Phase II feasibility study of adjuvant S-1 plus docetaxel for stage III gastric cancer patients after curative D2 gastrectomy (OGSG 0604).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 108-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Matsuyama ◽  
Shigeyuki Tamura ◽  
Kazumasa Fujitani ◽  
Yutaka Kimura ◽  
Takeshi Tsuji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
D2 Dissection ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

108 Background: An adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 has become the standard treatment for patients (pts) with stage II/III gastric cancer (GC) who have undergone gastrectomy with D2 dissection in Japan, but it is assumed that the survival benefit for stage III pts who received S-1 is modest. S-1 plus docetaxel has shown that the response rate and median overall survival (OS) were 56% and 14.3 months in pts with advanced GC. The aims of this phase II study were to evaluate the feasibility and safety of adjuvant S-1 plus docetaxel in pts with stage III GC with D2 surgery. Methods: Pts with pathological stage III GC who underwent gastrectomy with D2 dissection received oral S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) administration for 2 consecutive weeks and intravenous docetaxel (40 mg/m2) on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks (1 cycle). The treatment was started within 45 days after surgery, and repeated for 4 cycles, followed by S-1 administration until 1 year after surgery. The primary endpoint was feasibility of the 4 cycles administration of S-1 plus docetaxel; secondary endpoints were safety, progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and feasibility of S-1 administration until 1 year after surgery. Results: We enrolled 53 pts, 42 males and 11 females with a median age of 65 years (range, 43-78), between May 2007 and August 2008. Pathological stages included IIIA in 36 pts and IIIB in 17 pts. The feasibility of planned 4 cycles of treatment was 77.4% (95% CI 63.8-87.7%, p < 0.001) with 41 pts out of 53 pts. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 28% of pts with grade 3 febrile neutropenia in 9%. Non-hematological toxicities of grade 3 or more involved fatigue in 6%, anorexia in 9%, and nausea in 6%. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Reasons for discontinuation were recurrent cancer in 1 pt, adverse events in 10, and miscellaneous in 1, respectively. 3 year overall survival was 78.8% (95% CI 68.4-90.7) and 3 year disease free survival was 50.3% (95% CI 34.4-73.3). Conclusions: Adjuvant S-1 plus docetaxel therapy is feasible and has only moderate toxicity in stage III gastric cancer pts. We believe that this regimen will be a candidate for future phase III trials seeking the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III gastric cancer patients.

The effect of extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage therapy (EIPL) on stage III B + C and cytology-positive gastric cancer patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiro Masuda ◽  
Masafumi Kuramoto ◽  
Shinya Shimada ◽  
Satoshi Ikeshima ◽  
Kenichiro Yamamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Peritoneal Lavage ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

scholarly journals Appraisal of Long-time Outcomes After Curative Surgery in Elderly Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Matunaga ◽  
Ryo Ishiguro ◽  
Wataru Miyauchi ◽  
Yuji Shishido ◽  
Kozo Miyatani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Disease Specific Survival ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients ◽  
Disease Specific

Abstract Background: This study was conducted to assess the long-term outcomes of elderly patients among propensity-score-matched gastric cancer patients after curative gastrectomy and to propose the proper management of elderly gastric cancer patients.Methods: We enrolled 626 patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy at our institution between January 2004 and December 2015. To minimize selection bias among 2 groups, propensity score matching was performed.Results: Patients were divided into an elderly group over 75 years old (EP group; n=186) and a non-elderly group (NEP group; n=440). After propensity score matching, patients were divided into EP group (n=186) and NEP group (n=186). Five-year overall survival was significantly lower in the EP group than in the NEP group, consistent with a subgroup analysis of each stage. However, the 5-year disease-specific survival among all enrolled patients and those with stage I and II disease did not differ significantly. Moreover, in the subgroup of stage III patients, 5-year disease-specific survival was significantly lower in the EP group (23.0%) than in the NEP group (59.4%; P=0.004). Because elderly patients with stage III disease had an extremely poor prognosis, we decided to compare the two groups with stage III. The EP group contained significantly fewer patients with D2 lymphadectomy (P=0.002) and adjuvant chemotherapy (P<0.001) than the NEP group. Multivariate analysis revealed that older age and lymphatic invasion were independent prognostic factors. C-reactive protein to albumin ratio was significantly higher in patients in the EP group than in the NEP group (P=0.046), and the prognostic nutritional index was significantly lower in EP group patients than NEP group patients (P=0.045). Conclusions: Elderly gastric cancer patients with stage III disease showed poorer disease-specific survival compared with non-elderly patients, which may be due to fewer D2 lymphadenectomies, a lack of adjuvant chemotherapy, and a poorer nutritional and inflammatory background. The safe induction of standard lymphadenectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy with perioperative aggressive nutritional support may improve the prognosis of elderly gastric cancer patients with stage III disease.

Postoperation chemotherapy with S1 and docetaxel in curatively resected gastric cancer of stage III (POST trial).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4142-TPS4142
Author(s):  
Minkyu Jung ◽  
Seok Yun Kang ◽  
Bong-Seog Kim ◽  
Ki Hyang Kim ◽  
Kyung Hee Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Post Trial ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

TPS4142 Background: Complete surgical resections remains the only chance for cure in patients with gastric cancer, but approximately from 40% to 80% of patients still have recurrences and most patients ultimately die from their disease. The recent adjuvant trials in gastric cancer showed significantly improved survival in patients with adjuvant chemotherapy than those with surgery alone. However, further studies need for the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy following D2 dissected gastric cancer patients, especially in advanced gastric cancer. S-1 is an oral anticancer drug, a prodrug of fluorouracil, very effective in gastric cancer. Docetaxel is the first drug that showed survival benefits when added to the two drugs in advanced gastric cancer patients. And docetaxel is also synergistic anti-cancer effect with S-1 in advanced gastric cancer. Base on this background, the aim of this study is to detect a significant increase in 3 –year disease free survival (DFS) of adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel and S-1(DS) relative to those with S-1 and cisplatin (SP) in patients with stage III gastric cancer Methods: This study is an open-label, phase 3, randomized controlled trial, multicenter in South Korea. Patients with stage III (AJCC 7th edition) gastric cancer who had had curative D2 gastrectomy is randomly assigned to receive adjuvant chemotherapy of eight 3-week cycles of intravenous docetaxel (35 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8 of each cycle) plus oral S-1 (35 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1 to 14 of each cycle) for 6 months (DS) or chemotherapy of eight 3-week cycles of oral S1 plus intravenous cisplatin (60 mg/m2). After satisfying the screening criteria, patients have been randomized to the SD or SP arm in a 1:1 ratio. The randomization is stratified by institution and stage of disease (IIIA vs. IIIB vs. IIIC). The each stratum has been randomized by using the method of randomly permuted block. The primary endpoint is 3 year DFS, will analyze by intention to treat. A total of 290 patients will be enrolled, 67 patients have been treated to day, with continuing accrual. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01283217).

Phase II feasibility study of adjuvant S-1 plus docetaxel for stage III gastric cancer patients after curative D2 gastrectomy (OGSG 1002).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15032-e15032
Author(s):  
Jin Matsuyama ◽  
Kazumasa Fujitani ◽  
Shigeyuki Tamura ◽  
Yutaka Kimura ◽  
Hiroshi Imamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Feasibility Study ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
D2 Gastrectomy ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

Adjuvant treatment in stage III gastric cancer patients in Brazil and Peru: Results of a retrospective study in two cancer centers in Latin America.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16101-e16101
Author(s):  
Jose Eduardo Nunez ◽  
Tiago Felismino ◽  
Daniel Enriquez ◽  
Paola Catherine Montenegro ◽  
Felipe Coimbra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Latin America ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Cancer Centers ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

scholarly journals Levels of CEA and Ca 19 - 9 in the sera and peritoneal cavity in patients with gastric and pancreatic cancers

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 410-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Hoskovec ◽  
Jozef Varga ◽  
Ellen Konečná ◽  
František Antoš
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Carcinoma ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Markers ◽  
Peritoneal Cavity ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Biological Fluids ◽  
The Body ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

PURPOSE: Tumor markers are substances found in blood and other biological fluids if tumor is present in the body. They can be produced by tumor itself or can be results of cancer - body relation. They may be used in the follow-up of cancer patients to identify tumor recurrence. Pre-treatment levels have prognostic tool and could signalize persistence of minimal residual disease despite radical surgery. METHODS: We operated on 52 patients with upper GI malignancy (32 with gastric cancer and 20 with pancreatic cancer). Blood samples were taken before surgery and peritoneal samples immediately after laparotomy before any manipulation with tumor. All samples were examined by standard biochemical technique and the level was compared with a stage of the disease. RESULTS: Patients suffering from gastric carcinoma of stage I and II had higher level of both markers in sera then in the peritoneal cavity, however most of them were within physiological range. Patients in stage III and IV had average marker levels in the peritoneal cavity higher than in sera. Number of positive findings was increasing according to the stage of the disease. The peritoneal levels of both markers varied extremely in higher stages. In patients suffering from pancreatic carcinoma the CEA levels both in sera and peritoneal cavity were parallel but peritoneal levels were slightly higher in stages III and IV. Ca 19 - 9 was more sensitive for pancreatic cancer. The percentage of positive findings was higher in sera but the level of Ca 19 - 9 was higher in the peritoneal cavity. The number of positive findings again correlated with the stage of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: Levels of tumor markers in sera could signalize inoperability of tumor (Ca 19 - 9 in cases of pancreatic carcinoma); peritoneal levels could predict R1 resection especially in gastric cancer patients and risk of early peritoneal recurrence of the disease. Difference between the levels in the peritoneum and sera may signalize the route of dissemination (hematogenous and intraperitoneal).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document