scholarly journals Development of a Dissolution Method for Gliclazide Modified-Release Tablets Using USP Apparatus 3 with in Vitro–in Vivo Correlation

2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (7) ◽  
pp. 701-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerolayne de Castro Bezerra ◽  
Eduardo Costa Pinto ◽  
Lucio Mendes Cabral ◽  
Valéria Pereira de Sousa
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 2340-2349
Author(s):  
Devi Thamizhanban ◽  
Gampa Tulja Rani ◽  
Kathiresan krishnasamy

In-vitro biorelevant dissolution test method was developed for Dipyridamole in modified release multi-particulate dosage form, to simulate the product drug release after oral administration to human.  The Dipyridamole concentration in blood plasma achieved after oral administration under pre-prandial (fasting) condition were used for deriving the target dissolution profile deconvoluting the plasma concentration using numerical deconvolution technique. The fraction of drug absorbed was considered as the target dissolution profile. The drug product was tested by using the dissolution method recommended by office of generic drugs, and the dissolution results observed are not comparable with the target dissolution profile.  Dissolution method was developed using reciprocating cylinder, Bio-Dis (apparatus -3 as per USP), by simulating the pre-prandial conditions. A full factorial design of experiment was carried out to achieve the target dissolution profile. Media volume and dips per minute (DPM) are considered as main factors, in design of experiment. The dissolution results achieved with media volume 250ml and 10DPM were found to be comparable with target dissolution profile and observed with the F2 value (similarity factor) of 92%. The developed dissolution method demonstrates a very good in-vitro/in-vivo correlation under pre-prandial condition, and shall be used as a predictive in-vitro tool for evaluation Dipyridamole extended release capsules.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena Dalal ◽  
Abdul Wahab Allaf ◽  
Hind El-Zein

AbstractSelf-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (SNEDDS) were used to enhance the dissolution rate of furosemide as a model for class IV drugs and the system was solidified into liquisolid tablets. SNEDDS of furosemide contained 10% Castor oil, 60% Cremophor EL, and 30% PEG 400. The mean droplets size was 17.9 ± 4.5 nm. The theoretical model was used to calculate the amounts of the carrier (Avicel PH101) and coating materials (Aerosil 200) to prepare liquisolid powder. Carrier/coating materials ratio of 5/1 was used and Ludipress was added to the solid system, thus tablets with hardness of 45 ± 2 N were obtained. Liquisolid tablets showed 2-folds increase in drug release as compared to the generic tablets after 60 min in HCl 0.1 N using USP apparatus-II. Furosemide loaded SNEDDS tablets have great prospects for further in vivo studies, and the theoretical model is useful for calculating the adequate amounts of adsorbents required to solidify these systems.


1990 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome P. Skelly ◽  
Gordon L. Amidon ◽  
William H. Barr ◽  
Leslie Z. Benet ◽  
James E. Carter ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 723-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie R. Wingert ◽  
Natália O. dos Santos ◽  
Sarah C. Campanharo ◽  
Elisa S. Simon ◽  
Nadia M. Volpato ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 548-562
Author(s):  
Matthias Shona Roost ◽  
Henrike Potthast ◽  
Chantal Walther ◽  
Alfredo García-Arieta ◽  
Ivana Abalos ◽  
...  

This article describes an overview of waivers of in vivo bioequivalence studies for additional strengths in the context of the registration of modified release generic products and is a follow-up to the recent publication for the immediate release solid oral dosage forms. The current paper is based on a survey among the participating members of the Bioequivalence Working Group for Generics (BEWGG) of the International Pharmaceutical Regulators Program (IPRP) regarding this topic. Most jurisdictions consider the extrapolation of bioequivalence results obtained with one (most sensitive) strength of a product series as less straightforward for modified release products than for immediate release products. There is consensus that modified release products should demonstrate bioequivalence not only in the fasted state but also in the fed state, but differences exist regarding the necessity of additional multiple dose studies. Fundamental differences between jurisdictions are revealed regarding requirements on the quantitative composition of different strengths and the differentiation of single and multiple unit dosage forms. Differences in terms of in vitro dissolution requirements are obvious, though these are mostly related to possible additional comparative investigations rather than regarding the need for product-specific methods. As with the requirements for immediate release products, harmonization of the various regulations for modified release products is highly desirable to conduct the appropriate studies from a scientific point of view, thus ensuring therapeutic equivalence.


2002 ◽  
Vol 241 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Kortejärvi ◽  
J. Mikkola ◽  
M. Bäckman ◽  
S. Antila ◽  
M. Marvola
Keyword(s):  

1990 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome P. Skelly ◽  
Gordon L. Amidon ◽  
William H. Barr ◽  
Leslie Z. Benet ◽  
James E. Carter ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document