Influence of Structured Resistance Training on Daily Physical Activity Energy Expenditure in Breast Cancer Survivors

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 515-516
Author(s):  
Esther L. Moe ◽  
Jessica Dobek ◽  
Lillian Nail ◽  
Brad Wipfli ◽  
Kerri M. Winters-Stone
Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 3394
Author(s):  
Sarah A. Purcell ◽  
Ryan J. Marker ◽  
Marc-Andre Cornier ◽  
Edward L. Melanson

Many breast cancer survivors (BCS) gain fat mass and lose fat-free mass during treatment (chemotherapy, radiation, surgery) and estrogen suppression therapy, which increases the risk of developing comorbidities. Whether these body composition alterations are a result of changes in dietary intake, energy expenditure, or both is unclear. Thus, we reviewed studies that have measured components of energy balance in BCS who have completed treatment. Longitudinal studies suggest that BCS reduce self-reported energy intake and increase fruit and vegetable consumption. Although some evidence suggests that resting metabolic rate is higher in BCS than in age-matched controls, no study has measured total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) in this population. Whether physical activity levels are altered in BCS is unclear, but evidence suggests that light-intensity physical activity is lower in BCS compared to age-matched controls. We also discuss the mechanisms through which estrogen suppression may impact energy balance and develop a theoretical framework of dietary intake and TDEE interactions in BCS. Preclinical and human experimental studies indicate that estrogen suppression likely elicits increased energy intake and decreased TDEE, although this has not been systematically investigated in BCS specifically. Estrogen suppression may modulate energy balance via alterations in appetite, fat-free mass, resting metabolic rate, and physical activity. There are several potential areas for future mechanistic energetic research in BCS (e.g., characterizing predictors of intervention response, appetite, dynamic changes in energy balance, and differences in cancer sub-types) that would ultimately support the development of more targeted and personalized behavioral interventions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarah J. Ballinger ◽  
Sandra K. Althouse ◽  
Timothy P. Olsen ◽  
Kathy D. Miller ◽  
Jeffrey S. Sledge

PurposeDespite survival and quality of life benefits associated with physical activity, many breast cancer survivors remain inactive. Effective, sustainable interventions must account for individual differences in capability, motivation, and environment. Here, we evaluate the feasibility, mechanics, and efficacy of delivering an individualized, dynamic intervention to increase energetic capacity and energy expenditure.MethodsStage 0–III breast cancer patients who had completed primary treatment were enrolled. Prior to the intervention, detailed movement data was collected with a wearable GPS and accelerometer for 3 weeks to establish baseline activity. Movement data was collected continuously throughout the 12-week intervention, during which patients received electronically delivered, tailored, dynamic activity “prescriptions”, adjusted based on demonstrated individual capability, daily movement in their environment, and progress.ResultsOf 66 enrolled, 57 participants began and completed the intervention. The intervention resulted in significant improvements in average steps (+558 steps/day, p = 0.01), energetic capacity measured by power generation on a stationary bicycle (1.76 to 1.99 W/kg lean mass, p < 0.01), and quality of life (FACT-B TOI, 72.8 to 74.8, p = 0.02). The greatest improvement in functional energetic capacity was seen in the lowest performing tertile at baseline (0.76 to 1.12 W/kg, p < 0.01).DiscussionWearable technology delivery of personalized activity prescriptions based on individual capability and movement behaviors demonstrates feasibility and early effectiveness. The high variability seen in baseline activity and function, as well as in response to the intervention, supports the need for future work in precision approaches to physical activity (NCT03158519).


1999 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 2090-2096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond D. Starling ◽  
Dwight E. Matthews ◽  
Philip A. Ades ◽  
Eric T. Poehlman

We compared the accuracy of two physical activity recall questionnaires and a motion detector in 45- to 84-yr-old women ( n = 35) and men ( n = 32), using doubly labeled water (DLW) in conjunction with indirect calorimetry as the criterion measure. Subjects were administered the Yale Physical Activity Survey (YPAS) and Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire (LTA). Physical activity energy expenditure was determined over a 10-day period by using a Caltrac uniaxial accelerometer and DLW in conjunction with indirect calorimetry. In older women, Minnesota LTA (386 ± 228 kcal/day) and Caltrac (379 ± 162 kcal/day) underestimated physical activity by ∼55% compared with DLW (873 ± 244 kcal/day). No difference was observed between daily physical activity measured by the YPAS (863 ± 447 kcal/day) and DLW in older women. In older men, Minnesota LTA (459 ± 288 kcal/day) and Caltrac (554 ± 242 kcal/day) underestimated daily physical activity by ∼50–60% compared with DLW (1,211 ± 429 kcal/day). No difference was found between physical activity measured by the YPAS (1,107 ± 612 kcal/day) and DLW in older men. Despite no difference in mean physical activity levels between YPAS and DLW in women and men, Bland and Altman ( Lancet 1: 307–310, 1986) analyses demonstrated poor concordance between DLW and YPAS (i.e., limits of agreement = −1,310–1,518 kcal/day). Our data suggest that the Minnesota LTA recall and Caltrac uniaxial accelerometer may significantly underestimate free-living daily physical activity energy expenditure in older women and men. Although the YPAS compares favorably with DLW on a group basis, its use as a proxy measure of individual daily physical activity energy expenditure may be limited in older women and men.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuewen Wang ◽  
Barbara J. Nicklas

This study determined whether performing a single moderate- or vigorous-intensity exercise bout impacts daily physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE, by accelerometer). Overweight/obese postmenopausal women underwent a 5-month caloric restriction and moderate- (n=18) or vigorous-intensity (n=18) center-based aerobic exercise intervention. During the last month of intervention, in women performing moderate-intensity exercise, PAEE on days with exercise (577.7±219.7kcal⋅d−1) was higher (P=.011) than on days without exercise (450.7±140.5kcal⋅d−1); however, the difference (127.0±188.1kcal⋅d−1) was much lower than the energy expended during exercise. In women performing vigorous-intensity exercise, PAEE on days with exercise (450.6±153.6kcal⋅d−1) was lower (P=.047) than on days without exercise (519.2±127.4kcal⋅d−1). Thus, women expended more energy on physical activities outside of prescribed exercise on days they did NOT perform center-based exercise, especially if the prescribed exercise was of a higher intensity.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon L. Mihalko ◽  
Samantha E. Yocke ◽  
Greg Russell ◽  
Marissa Howard-McNatt ◽  
Edward A. Levine

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document