Hypotensive Effect After Traditional Set Versus Agonist-antagonist Paired Sets For Upper-Body Resistance Exercises

2014 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 816-817
Author(s):  
Gabriel A. Paz ◽  
Marianna de Freitas Maia ◽  
Vicente Pinheiro Lima ◽  
Humberto Miranda
2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-86
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Ferrari ◽  
Gabriela Kothe ◽  
Martim Bottaro ◽  
Eduardo Lusa Cadore ◽  
Luiz Fernando Martins Kruel

Background: Data investigating the factors that influence the relationship between different percentages of one repetition maximum (1RM) and the maximum number of repetitions (RM’s) performed are scarce when the movement velocity of each repetition is controlled during the RM’s test. Objective: To evaluate the RM’s performed at 60, 75, and 90% of 1RM in 4 different upper-body free weight exercises: bench press, barbell triceps extension, unilateral dumbbell elbow flexion, unilateral bent knee dumbbell row. Method: Thirty participants, 15 trained (T) and 15 untrained (UT) men, volunteered to participate in this study and attended six separate occasions, each separated by at least 48 h. In the first three sessions, familiarization and 1RM tests were evaluated. The last three sessions were designed to assess the performance of the RM’s at 60%, 75%, and 90% 1RM. The exercise order and intensities performed in each session were randomized. Muscle action velocity for each repetition was controlled by an electronic metronome. Results: There was no significant difference between T and UT in any of the exercises at a given exercise intensity. Moreover, there was no significant difference in the number of repetitions performed when exercises with different muscle mass (i.e., bench press vs. triceps extension, and dumbbell row vs. elbow flexion) at different intensities (i.e., 60%, 75%, and 90%) were compared. Conclusion: Using the same percentage of 1RM, the participants performed a similar number of repetitions in the four free weight upper-body exercises evaluated.


2018 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronny Bergquist ◽  
Vegard Moe Iversen ◽  
Paul J Mork ◽  
Marius Steiro Fimland

Abstract Elastic resistance bands require little space, are light and portable, but their efficacy has not yet been established for several resistance exercises. The main objective of this study was to compare the muscle activation levels induced by elastic resistance bands versus conventional resistance training equipment (dumbbells) in the upper-body resistance exercises flyes and reverse flyes. The level of muscle activation was measured with surface electromyography in 29 men and women in a cross-over design where resistance loadings with elastic resistance bands and dumbbells were matched using 10-repetition maximum loadings. Elastic resistance bands induced slightly lower muscle activity in the muscles most people aim to activate during flyes and reverse flies, namely pectoralis major and deltoideus posterior, respectively. However, elastic resistance bands increased the muscle activation level substantially in perceived ancillary muscles, that is deltoideus anterior in flyes, and deltoideus medius and trapezius descendens in reverse flyes, possibly due to elastic bands being a more unstable resistance modality. Overall, the results show that elastic resistance bands can be considered a feasible alternative to dumbbells in flyes and reverse flyes.


2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 757-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Antonio Soriano ◽  
Timothy J. Suchomel ◽  
Pedro J. Marín

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 1573-1577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Humberto Miranda ◽  
Roberto Simão ◽  
PatrÍcia dos Santos Vigário ◽  
Belmiro Freitas de Salles ◽  
Marcos TT Pacheco ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Gahreman ◽  
Mehdi Moghadam ◽  
Ehsan Hoseininejad ◽  
Vahid Dehnou ◽  
Jonathan Connor ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 504-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
JohnEric W. Smith ◽  
Ben M. Krings ◽  
Brandon D. Shepherd ◽  
Hunter S. Waldman ◽  
Steven A. Basham ◽  
...  

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the individual and combined effects of ingesting carbohydrates (CHO) and branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) during high-volume upper body resistance exercise (RE) on markers of catabolism and performance. Thirteen resistance-trained males completed 4 experimental trials with supplementation, ingesting beverages containing CHO, BCAA, CHO+BCAA, or placebo (PLA) in a randomized, double-blind design. The beverages were ingested in 118-mL servings 6 times during an ∼60-min RE session consisting of bench press, bent-over row, incline press, and close-grip row. Each RE was performed with 5 sets of repetitions at 65% 1-repetition maximum until volitional fatigue. Blood samples were collected at baseline, immediately postexercise, and 60 min postexercise to assess glucose and insulin. Cortisol was assessed immediately and at 60 min postexercise. No significant performance benefits were observed for any RE. CHO+BCAA (152.4 ± 71.4 ng/mL) resulted in the lowest cortisol levels, which was lower than BCAA and PLA (193.7 ± 88.5, 182.8 ± 67.5 ng/mL, p < 0.05), but not different from CHO (165 ± 76.5 ng/mL, p = 0.342). Postexercise insulin concentrations were significantly higher with CHO (4.79 ± 3.4 mU/L) compared with BCAA and PLA (3.7 ± 2.0, 3.5 ± 1.8 mU/L, p < 0.05), but not different from CHO+BCAA (4.3 ± 2.5 mU/L, p = 0.339). There was no treatment effect for glucose, but glucose significantly increased from baseline to immediately postexercise and significantly decreased at 60 min postexercise. Ingesting beverages containing CHO with or without BCAA during upper body resistance exercise may promote a more favorable postexercise less catabolic environment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document