scholarly journals Revised finite sound ray integration method based on Kirchhoff's integral equation.

1989 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Asayama ◽  
Sho Kimura ◽  
Katsuaki Sekiguchi
2014 ◽  
Vol 1030-1032 ◽  
pp. 223-227
Author(s):  
Lin Fan ◽  
Song Rong Qian ◽  
Teng Fei Ma

In order to analysis the force situation of the material which is discontinuity,we can used the new theory called peridynamics to slove it.Peridynamics theory is a new method of molecular dynamics that develops very quickly.Peridynamics theory used the volume integral equation to constructed the model,used the volume integral equation to calculated the PD force in the horizon.So It doesn’t need to assumed the material’s continuity which must assumed that use partial differential equation to formulates the equation of motion. Destruction and the expend of crack which have been included in the peridynamics’ equation of motion.Do not need other additional conditions.In this paper,we introduce the peridynamics theory modeling method and introduce the relations between peridynamics and classic theory of mechanics.We also introduce the numerical integration method of peridynamics.Finally implementation the numerical integration in prototype microelastic brittle material.Through these work to show the advantage of peridynamics to analysis the force situation of the material.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Safa’ Hamdan ◽  
Naji Qatanani ◽  
Adnan Daraghmeh

Two numerical techniques, namely, Haar Wavelet and the product integration methods, have been employed to give an approximate solution of the fractional Volterra integral equation of the second kind. To test the applicability and efficiency of the numerical method, two illustrative examples with known exact solution are presented. Numerical results show clearly that the accuracy of these methods are in a good agreement with the exact solution. A comparison between these methods shows that the product integration method provides more accurate results than its counterpart.


1962 ◽  
Vol 2 (03) ◽  
pp. 211-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.G. Savins ◽  
G.C. Wallick ◽  
W.R. Foster

Abstract A comprehensive review of the salient features of the differentiation method of rheological analysis in Poiseuille flow from its inception circa 1928 is presented. Here no initial assumptions regarding the nature of the function relating rheological parameters to observed kinematical and dynamical parameters are required in the data-analysis process. In contrast, the integration method involves interpreting flow properties in terms of a particular ideal model. It is shown that, although both methods represent modes of solution of the same integral equation, being relatively bias-free, the differentiation method offers a more discriminating procedure for rheological analysis. The application to problems involving plane Poiseuille flow is also described. Introduction In most instances, the approach to the problem of interpreting the rheological properties of various compositions as they ate affected by changes in chemical or physical environment, as saying the characteristics of a particular constituent of a suspension, analyzing flow behavior in terms of interactions between components in a system, to cite but a few examples, has been in terms of what Hersey terms the integration method. Briefly, it consists of interpreting flow properties in terms of a particular ideal model. The usual practice of the integration method is to choose a model with a minimum number of parameters because, other things being equal, it is desirable to use the simplest model which will describe the behavior of a real material and yet be mathematically tract able for the requirements of data analysis. This expression is then substituted into an equation which relates observed kinematical and dynamical quantities, such as volume flux Q and pressure gradient J, and angular velocity and torque T, in a capillary and concentric cylinder apparatus, respectively. The rheological parameters appear on integrating, in an expression relating the pairs of observable quantities such as those just given. In many instances a particular model provides a good representation of rheological behavior over a reasonable range of compositional and environmental changes. just as often, however, it is obvious that the interpretation of rheological changes by the integration method is not providing realistic information about changes in flow behavior. A more general method of interpreting rheological data for a given material is to make no initial assumptions regarding the nature of the function relating rheological parameters to observed kinematical and dynamical quantities, e.g., flow rate and pressure drop in capillary flow or angular velocity and torque in a rotational viscometer. This general method Hersey terms the differentiation method. Instead of integrating, one differentiates the integral equation with respect to one of the limits, i.e., one of the boundary conditions; the resulting expression contains the same observable quantities just given, their derivatives, and the rheological function evaluated at that boundary. By obtaining these derivatives from experimental ‘data, graphically or by a computer routine, they can be substituted into the differential equation and a graphical form of the function derived. THEORY OF THE DIFFERENTIATION METHOD FOR POISEUILLE-TYPE FLOWS In this introductory paper, two flow cases which are important in viscometry are considered (one for the first time) from the differentiation method of analysis, flow in a cylindrical tube and flow between fixed parallel surfaces of infinite extent, the basic integral equations being formulated in a manner analogous to the way they originally appeared in the literature. In addition, the following ideal conditions will be assumed:an absence of anomalous wall effects,isotropic behavior everywhere, andsteady laminar flow conditions. SPEJ P. 211^


2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 774-793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Grammont ◽  
Mario Ahues ◽  
Hanane Kaboul

A Fredholm integral equation of the second kind in L1([a, b], C) with a weakly singular kernel is considered. Sufficient conditions are given for the existence and uniqueness of the solution. We adapt the product integration method proposed in C0 ([a, b], C) to apply it in L1 ([a, b], C), and discretize the equation. To improve the accuracy of the approximate solution, we use different iterative refinement schemes which we compare one to each other. Numerical evidence is given with an application in Astrophysics.


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahlem Nemer ◽  
Hanane Kaboul ◽  
Zouhir Mokhtari

Abstract In this paper, we consider general cases of linear Volterra integral equations under minimal assumptions on their weakly singular kernels and introduce a new product integration method in which we involve the linear interpolation to get a better approximate solution, figure out its effect and also we provide a convergence proof. Furthermore, we apply our method to a numerical example and conclude this paper by adding a conclusion


2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (9) ◽  
pp. 4884-4889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binbin Wang ◽  
Mang He ◽  
Jinbo Liu ◽  
Hongwei Chen ◽  
Guoqiang Zhao ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document