scholarly journals Effects of the Spray Dryer Types on the Physical Properties of Spray Dried Milk Powder

1964 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 672-679,a1
Author(s):  
Yozo Ishioka
2008 ◽  
Vol 73 (9) ◽  
pp. E431-E438 ◽  
Author(s):  
U.V. Lay Ma ◽  
G.R. Ziegler ◽  
J.D. Floros

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (66) ◽  
pp. 9439-9453
Author(s):  
CN Ishiwu ◽  
◽  
JE Obiegbuna ◽  
JO Iwouno ◽  

Samples of spray-dried soy milk powder were produced at various spray-dryer inlet air temperatures and characterized. Soybean seed (Glycine max TAX 1448 – 2E Var.) was sorted, boiled for 40 min, manually dehulled, wet milled using plate mill and sieved with muslin cloth to obtain water soluble extract (soy milk). The soy milk was divided into two portions (samples A and B) and spray-dried using co-current spray dryer at a constant feed rate (20.5 ml/sec) but at air-inlet temperatures of 204oC and 260oC, respectively. Preliminary investigation carried out on this study showed that samples produced at air inlet temperatures below 200oC exhibited wet and agglomerated particles. The recovered powdered samples were analyzed for proximate composition, pH, available lysine, total solids, pack bulk density, viscosity, solubility and wettability at different reconstituting water temperatures, and sensory properties. Results showed that 38.60% and 45.55% yield (soy milk powder) were achieved at the end of the process for samples A and B respectively. The samples showed no significant differences (P ≥ 0.05) in some of these evaluated parameters such as fat, ash and pH. Soy milk powder showed high protein content (62.05±0.23%), fat (19.92±0.08%), ash (1.41±0.02 %) and available lysine (5.02±0.29%), but low carbohydrate content (12.85±0.01 %) and moisture (3.66±0.23%). The physical properties showed that the mean total solid of the samples was 10.33±0.33%, pack bulk density (0.57±0.00 g/ml), while the mean viscosity was 47 mpas. The sample spray-dried at 204oC had solubilities of 48% and 78% at reconstituting water temperatures of 40oC and 80oC, respectively while the sample produced at 260°C showed lower solubility of 38.46% and 45.01% when temperature of reconstitution were 40oC and 60oC, respectively. However, the sample produced at 260oC exhibited decreased solubility when the reconstituting water temperature was raised above 60oC. Its solubility was 40.39% at reconstituting water temperature of 70oC which further decreased to 38% at 80o C. The wettability of the samples steadily decreased as the reconstituting water temperature increased from 40 to 80oC. The wettability of the sample spray-dried at 204oC decreased from 36 to 22 sec, while that of sample spray-dried at 260oC decreased from 29 to 18 sec. Sensory scores showed that the sample spray-dried at 204oC was preferred to the sample spray-dried at 260oC.


1955 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 387-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. H. R. Anderson ◽  
Doris M. Stone

SummaryEight explosive outbreaks of food poisoning, occurring in school canteens in England during 1953 and affecting 1190 known cases, are described. The clinical features were characteristic of the toxin type of illness. No deaths occurred.The food causing all of these outbreaks was prepared from spray-dried skim milk powder. It was not subsequently heat-treated and was usually consumed 3–4 hr. after preparation.The spray-dried milk powder proved to contain a high content of bacteria, including large numbers of Staph. aureus, of a phage pattern often associated with food poisoning. The assumption was therefore made that these outbreaks were caused by staphylococcal enterotoxin.Because the food was often consumed within 3–4 hr. of reconstitution of the milk powder—before, in fact, the staphylococci had had time to grow—it is concluded that the poisoning must have been due mainly to pre-formed toxin.Consideration is given to the opportunities for the formation of toxin in a spray-drying plant, and reasons are brought forward for believing that it is formed mainly in the balance tank where the warm milk is kept, sometimes for several hours, before passing into the final drying chamber.The processing of the milk and the precautions for preventing contamination of the finished product are discussed.


LWT ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 112175
Author(s):  
Adriana Dantas ◽  
Silvani Verruck ◽  
Maria Helena Machado Canella ◽  
Bruna Marchesan Maran ◽  
Fabio Seigi Murakami ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 256-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Samborska ◽  
Elwira Langa ◽  
Anna Kamińska-Dwórznicka ◽  
Dorota Witrowa-Rajchert

2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (13) ◽  
pp. 2101-2106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin J. Atkins ◽  
Michael R.W. Walmsley ◽  
James R. Neale

2019 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. 643-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvani Verruck ◽  
Gabriela Rodrigues de Liz ◽  
Carolinne Odebrech Dias ◽  
Renata Dias de Mello Castanho Amboni ◽  
Elane Schwinden Prudencio

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.K. Abdalla ◽  
K. Smith ◽  
J. Lucey

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document