Organizational and market factors associated with Medicare dependence in inpatient rehabilitation hospitals

2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Thompson ◽  
M. J. McCue
Author(s):  
Ralf F. Tauber ◽  
Carola Nisch ◽  
Mutahira M. Qureshi ◽  
Olivia Patsalos ◽  
Hubertus Himmerich

In Germany, inpatient therapy for depression mainly takes place in either health insurance-financed psychiatric hospitals, or in pension insurance-financed, psychotherapy-focused, psychosomatic rehabilitation hospitals. In psychiatric hospitals, the diagnosis is made according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), and therapeutic attempts are made to achieve remission, whereas in rehabilitation hospitals, the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) plays an essential diagnostic role. Accordingly, the main German pension insurance, Deutsche Rentenversicherung, has developed a rehabilitation therapy standard for depressive disorders. In this chapter, we focus on the psychotherapeutic inpatient rehabilitation for patients with depression based on an example of a specialized psychotherapeutic hospital. This example illustrates how psychotherapeutic inpatient rehabilitation can be tailored to the individual’s needs and may include any of the following therapeutic modalities: Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT), Schema Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP), pharmacotherapy, group therapy for comorbid conditions, skills training, psychoeducation, occupational therapy (OT), movement therapy, physiotherapy, music therapy, social work, family work, and self-help groups. People with depression may benefit from this service model of psychosomatic inpatient rehabilitation beyond symptom remission, as it focuses on increasing people’s functional level as well as their quality of life.


2015 ◽  
Vol 96 (10) ◽  
pp. e8
Author(s):  
Shirley Shih ◽  
Paul Gerrard ◽  
Richard Goldstein ◽  
Jacqueline Mix ◽  
Paulette Niewczyk ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S411-S412
Author(s):  
Minn M Soe

Abstract Background Reducing unnecessary urinary catheter use and optimizing insertion techniques and catheter maintenance and care practices are the most important urinary tract infection (CAUTI) prevention strategies. To monitor device use (DU) as quality improvement activity, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) developed the risk adjusted, standardized urinary catheter device utilization ratio in 2015. This study aims to assess national trends of DU from the baseline year 2015 through 2019. Methods For our trend analysis, we analyzed DU data (catheter days per 100 inpatient-days) that acute care hospitals (ACHs), long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs), inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs), and critical access hospitals (CAHs) reported to NHSN from 2015Q1 through 2019Q1. The ward and intensive care unit patient care locations included in our analysis are those that ACHs, LTACHs, IRFs and CAHs are required to report to CMS to comply with CMS Inpatient Quality Reporting program requirements. We regressed DU by quarterly period using generalized estimating equation modeling with the negative-binomial distribution, after adjusting for factors associated with corresponding SUR models of 2015 baseline and accounting for autocorrelation of error terms within a location. For graphic display, we also computed quarterly DU using marginal predictive models. Results The DU decreased over time (P ≤ 0.05, average percent change per quarter (%change): −0.54 [95% CI: −0.54, −0.53]) among ACHs (Table 1, Figure 1), and −0.54 [95% CI: −0.58, −0.49] among LTACHs (Table 1, Figure 2). Among IRFs, quarterly DU in 2015Q2–2016Q3 were similar relative to 2015Q1, but decreased from 2016Q4 onward (P ≤ 0.05, % change: −0.51 [95% CI: −0.61, −0.40]) (Table 1, Figure 3). Among CAHs, quarterly DU in 2015Q2–2016Q4 were similar relative to 2015Q1, but decreased from 2017Q1 onward (P ≤ 0.05, % change: −0.22 [95% CI: −0.39, −0.04]) (Table 1, Figure 4). Conclusion There was a statistically significant decrease in National DU of urinary catheter during 2015–2019 across NHSN, although the magnitude of change per quarter was not large. Further research is needed to explore causal factors associated with such reduction. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


PM&R ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. S126-S126
Author(s):  
Prateek Grover ◽  
Abhishek Jain ◽  
Sri Krishna Patchala ◽  
Sindhu Jacob ◽  
Angela Valleck ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document