prosthetic fitting
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

118
(FIVE YEARS 11)

H-INDEX

17
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2022 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Boesendorfer ◽  
Agnes Sturma ◽  
Clemens Gstoettner ◽  
Anna Pittermann ◽  
Gregor Laengle ◽  
...  

Introduction: Many adults who had a severe Narakas IV obstetric brachial plexus injury (OBPI) suffer from extensive impairments in daily living due to limited hand-arm function. The dramatic loss of axonal support at this very early age of development often render the entire extremity a biologic wasteland and reconstructive methods and therapies often fail to recover any functional hand use. In this scenario bionic reconstruction, including an elective amputation and a subsequent prosthetic fitting, may enable functional improvement in adults suffering from the consequences of such severe brachial plexus injuries. We here describe our experience in treating such patients and lay out the surgical rational and rehabilitation protocol exemplified in one patient.Case Presentation/Methods: A 27-year-old adult with a unilateral OBPI contacted our center. He presented with globally diminished function of the affected upper extremity with minimal hand activity, resulting in an inability to perform various tasks of daily living. No biological reconstructive efforts were available to restore meaningful hand function. An interdisciplinary evaluation, including a psychosocial assessment, was used to assess eligibility for bionic reconstruction. Before the amputation and after the prosthetic fitting functional assessments and self-reported questionnaires were performed.Results: One month after the amputation and de-rotation osteotomy of the humerus the patient was fitted with a myoelectric prosthesis. At the 1.5 year-follow-up assessment, the patient presented with a distinct improvement of function: the ARAT improved from 12 to 20 points, SHAP score improved from 8 to 29, and the DASH value improved from 50 to 11.7. The average wearing times of the prosthesis were 5 to 6 h per day (on 4–5 days a week).Discussion: The options for adults suffering from the consequences of severe OBPIs to improve function are limited. In selected patients in whom the neurological deficit is so severe that biologic hand function is unsatisfactory, an elective amputation and subsequent restoration of the hand with mechatronic means may be an option. The follow-up results indicate that this concept can indeed lead to solid hand function and independence in daily activities after amputation, subsequent prosthetic fitting, and rehabilitation.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael EL Leow ◽  
Ambrose YK Lim ◽  
Ellen Y Lee ◽  
Alphonsus KS Chong

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (7) ◽  
pp. 403-408
Author(s):  
Lidia Marcos García ◽  
Eduardo Mateos Torres ◽  
Alina Velescu ◽  
Carles Díaz Duran ◽  
Mónica Lacambra Peñart ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Annelies van der Vegt ◽  
Annelies van der Vegt ◽  
Joannes H.B. Geertzen ◽  
Maria A. Paping

Case Presentation: A 53-year-old motorcyclist suffered trauma with an extensive foot injury. A Pirogoff amputation was performed. A hindfoot amputation might be considered as an alternative option rather than directly proceeding to a trans-tibial amputation. Results: A Pirogoff amputation was performed with a disappointing course afterward. Subsequently, we performed a literature search on the Pirogoff amputation. Conclusion: Further research is needed concerning the optimal amputation level for patients who need a hindfoot amputation since good studies are lacking. In general, a major advantage of the Pirogoff amputation is the possibility of some barefoot mobility. The disadvantages are fitting problems due to a bulbous stump and limited installation height for the incorporation of a prosthesis. A trans-tibial amputation might be considered in young and healthy patients because of the extensive possibilities for prosthetic fitting. The final decision of the amputation level should be made by an experienced surgical and rehabilitation team discussing the advantages and disadvantages with the patient involved. Currently, evidence from the literature is too limited to guide this discussion and the decision-making process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document