Aspiration Thrombectomy in Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion and Mild Stroke: A Single-Center Experience

OBJECTIVEThe optimal front-line thrombectomy choice for primary recanalization of a target artery remains unknown for patients with acute large-vessel occlusion (LVO) and an underlying intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS). The authors aimed to compare procedural characteristics and outcomes between patients who received a stent-retriever thrombectomy (SRT) and patients who received a contact aspiration thrombectomy (CAT), as the front-line approach for treating LVO due to severe underlying ICAS.METHODSOne hundred thirty patients who presented with acute LVO and underlying severe ICAS at the occlusion site were included. Procedural characteristics and treatment outcomes were compared between patients treated with front-line SRT (n = 70) and those treated with front-line CAT (n = 60). The primary outcomes were the rate of switching to an alternative thrombectomy technique, time from groin puncture to initial reperfusion, and duration of the procedure. Initial reperfusion was defined as revealing the underlying culprit stenosis with an antegrade flow after thrombectomy.RESULTSThe rate of switching to an alternative thrombectomy after failure of the front-line technique was significantly higher in the CAT group than in the SRT group (40% vs 4.3%; OR 2.543, 95% CI 1.893–3.417, p < 0.001). The median time from puncture to initial reperfusion (17 vs 31 minutes, p < 0.001) and procedure duration (39 vs 75.5 minutes, p < 0.001) were significantly shorter in the SRT group than in the CAT group. In the binary logistic regression analysis, a longer time from puncture to initial reperfusion was an independent predictor of a 90-day poor (modified Rankin Scale score 3–6) functional outcome (per 1-minute increase; OR 1.029, 95% CI 1.008–1.050, p = 0.006).CONCLUSIONSThe authors’ results suggest that SRT may be more effective than CAT for identifying underlying culprit stenosis and therefore considered the optimal front-line thrombectomy technique in acute stroke patients with LVO and severe underlying ICAS.

Download Full-text

Abstract 1122‐000022: Delays in Care for Patients with Acute Stroke During Hospitalization for Other Reasons

Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology ◽

10.1161/svin.01.suppl_1.000022 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1 (S1) ◽

Author(s):

Nicholas Vigilante ◽

Parth Patel ◽

Prasanth Romiyo ◽

Lauren Thau ◽

Mark Heslin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Acute Care ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Single Center ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Symptom Recognition ◽

Risk Patients ◽

Recognition Imaging

Introduction : In‐hospital stroke (IHS) is defined as stroke that occurs during hospitalization for non‐stroke conditions. We aimed to understand the timing of symptom recognition for patients who experienced IHS and its impact on the care they receive. Methods : A prospective, single center registry of adult patients (9/20/19‐2/28/21) was queried for acute anterior circulation IHS. Indications for hospitalization, delays from last known well (LKW) to symptom recognition, imaging, and treatment were explored. Results : Of 928 consecutively evaluated adults with acute stroke, 85 (9%) developed an anterior circulation IHS, 39 (46%) of whom were female, with a median age of 67 years (IQR 60–76) and median NIHSS of 15 (IQR 4–22). Sixty‐eight (80%) had a >1 hour delay from last known well to symptom recognition. Two patients (2%) received IV thrombolysis, although another 38 (45%) would have been eligible if not for a delay in symptom recognition. An ICA, M1, or M2 occlusion was observed in 18 patients (21%), 7 of whom were treated at a median of 174 minutes after LKW (IQR 65–219). Compared to the 11 patients who did not undergo thrombectomy with large vessel occlusion, those who underwent thrombectomy had non‐significantly shorter delays from LKW until neuroimaging (median 85 [IQR 65‐162] vs. 216 [IQR 133‐507], p = 0.12). Conclusions : While uncommon, patients with IHS experience delays in symptom recognition and treatment, which lead to exclusion from acute care treatment such as thrombolysis and thrombectomy. Earlier detection with more frequent nursing assessments or advanced neuromonitoring devices in at‐risk patients may reduce delays in care.

Download Full-text

Abstract 3183: Prognosis of Mild Ischemic Stroke with Large Vessel Occlusion

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.43.suppl_1.a3183 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Esteban Cheng-Ching ◽

Russell Cerejo ◽

Ken Uchino ◽

Muhammad S Hussain ◽

Gabor Toth

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Therapy ◽

Time Window ◽

Optimal Treatment ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Nihss Score ◽

Mild Stroke

Background and purpose Large vessel occlusion (LVO) in acute ischemic stroke has been reported to be an independent predictor of unfavorable clinical outcome. However, the prognosis and optimal treatment of patients with only mild neurologic deficits due to LVO are not known. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review from a database of stroke patients admitted to our large academic medical center between July 1, 2010 and June 30 , 2011. Inclusion criteria were acute stroke or TIA, presentation within 9 hours from symptom onset, large vessel occlusion as a culprit of ischemic symptoms, and mild stroke severity with initial NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score <8. Results We identified 59 patients with mild ischemic stroke or TIA, who were evaluated within 9 hours from onset. Of these, 13 (22%) had culprit large vessel occlusions. Five were female, 1 had diabetes, 12 had hypertension, 7 had hyperlipidemia, 2 had atrial fibrillation and 7 were smokers. The median NIHSS score was 5. The location of arterial occlusions were 5 in M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), 6 in M2 segment of MCA, 1 each in posterior cerebral and vertebral arteries. Two patients received acute therapy, 1 with intravenous thrombolysis and 1 with endovascular therapy. Reasons for withholding thrombolytic therapy were time window in 8, mild stroke severity in 2, and atypical presentations in 2. Reasons for withholding acute endovascular therapy were mild stroke severity in 7, imaging finding in 2, technical considerations in 2, and lack of consent in 1. From hospital admission to discharge, 10 (77%) patients had symptom improvement, 2 had worsening, and one was unchanged. At 30 days, 5 (38%) had good outcome with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-1. Three (23%) had mRS of 2, one (8%) patient had mRS of 3. Outcomes for 4 patients were unknown. Conclusions A significant proportion of patients presenting with mild ischemic symptoms has large vessel occlusion. Acute treatment in this population is frequently withheld due to mild severity or thrombolytic time window. Despite mild symptoms at presentation, some patients are left with moderate disability. Optimal treatment options for this population should be further evaluated in a larger group of patients.

Download Full-text

Rescue, Combined, and Stand-Alone Thrombectomy in the Management of Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Using the Solitaire Device: A Prospective 50-Patient Single-Center Study

Stroke ◽

10.1161/strokeaha.110.608976 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 42 (7) ◽

pp. 1929-1935 ◽

Cited By ~ 149

Author(s):

Vincent Costalat ◽

Paolo Machi ◽

Kyriakos Lobotesis ◽

Igor Maldonado ◽

Jean François Vendrell ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Large Vessel ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Single Center ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Single Center Study ◽

Center Study

Download Full-text

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy as first-line approach for large vessel occlusion (COMPASS): a multicentre, randomised, open label, blinded outcome, non-inferiority trial.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature ◽

10.3410/f.735261042.793574858 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

David Liebeskind

Keyword(s):

Stent Retriever ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

First Line ◽

Open Label ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Aspiration Thrombectomy

Download Full-text

Abstract P11: Clinical Utility of Aspects in Late Window Stroke Thrombectomy Patients: Insights From Star

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p11 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Guilherme B Porto ◽

Zachary Hubbard ◽

Sami Al Kasab ◽

Eyad Almallouhi ◽

Robert Starke ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ct Scan ◽

Symptom Onset ◽

Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Star Collaboration ◽

Outcome Data ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Aspiration Thrombectomy

Introduction: Recent trials have proven safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy for patients presenting with emergent large vessel occlusion beyond 6 hours of symptom onset. While evidence supports using baseline CT scan to evaluate the candidacy for mechanical thrombectomy for patients presenting in the early window, late window trials have used advanced imaging such as CT and MR perfusion. We aim to assess outcomes of MT stratified by admission Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS). Methods: We used data from the prospectively maintained registries of 28 stroke centers in the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm (STAR) collaboration. Demographics, comorbidities, LVO site, ASPECTS, MT technique, radiographic and clinical outcome data were collected. Patients with M1 or ICA occlusion were included in these analyses. Multivariable analysis was performed using a generalized linear model with logit link to assess for variables associated with favorable outcomes. Results: 3356 patients in the STAR database were reviewed and 347 (10.3%) of those underwent MT in the late window (table). Median age was 69, 189 (54.5%) were female, and 181 (52.2%) were white. 295 patients ASPECTS ≥6. In this group, 200 (68.8%) had M1 occlusion, and the remaining had ICA occlusion. Aspiration thrombectomy was used in 139 (47.1%) of patients. Successful reperfusion was achieved (mTICI≥2b) in 264 (76.1%). sICH was observed in 15 (5.1%). Excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-2) was observed in 124 (42%) patients. ASPECTS score was independently associated with favorable outcomes (aOR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.4, P=0.006). Conclusion: Excellent outcomes are observed in patients with good ASPECT score presenting in the late window irrespective of perfusion criteria. Admission CT scan could be used to triage patients presenting with emergent large vessel occlusion beyond 6 hours of symptom onset.

Download Full-text

MRS SOFIA: a multicenter retrospective study for use of Sofia for revascularization of acute ischemic stroke

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery ◽

10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-017042 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. neurintsurg-2020-017042

Author(s):

Waleed Brinjikji ◽

Eytan Raz ◽

Reade De Leacy ◽

Dan Meila ◽

Maxim Mokin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Retrospective Study ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Median Number ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Aspiration Thrombectomy ◽

First Pass ◽

Number Of Passes

BackgroundOver the past several years there has been increased interest in the use of the Sofia aspiration system (MicroVention, Tustin, California) as a primary aspiration catheter.ObjectiveTo perform a multicenter retrospective study examining the efficacy of the Sofia aspiration catheter as a standalone aspiration treatment for large vessel occlusion.MethodsConsecutive cases in which the Sofia catheter was used for aspiration thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion were included. Exclusion criteria were the following: (1) Sofia not used for first pass, and (2) a stent retriever used as an adjunct on the first pass. The primary outcome of the study was first pass recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2c/3). Secondary outcomes included first pass TICI 2b/3, crossover to other thrombectomy devices, number of passes, time from puncture to recanalization, and complications.Results323 patients were included. First pass TICI 2c/3 was achieved in 49.8% of cases (161/323). First pass TICI 2b/3 was achieved in 69.7% (225/323) of cases. 74.8% had TICI 2b/3 with the Sofia alone. Crossover to other thrombectomy devices occurred in 29.1% of cases (94/323). The median number of passes was 1 (IQR=1–3). Median time from puncture to recanalization was 26 min (IQR=17–45). Procedure related complications occurred in 3.1% (10/323) of cases.ConclusionOur study highlights the potential advantage of the Sofia aspiration catheter for primary aspiration thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. High rates of first pass recanalization with low crossover rates to other thrombectomy devices were achieved. Median procedure time was low, as were procedural complications.

Download Full-text