The Quantitative Model of Shenzhen Talent Attraction Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)-Grey Relational Comprehensive Evaluation

2018 ◽  
Vol 07 (12) ◽  
pp. 1574-1582
Author(s):  
钰卓 郭
Keyword(s):  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Comprehensive Evaluation ◽  
Quantitative Model ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
The Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Grey Relational ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Evaluation of port emergency logistics systems based on grey analytic hierarchy process

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 4749-4761
Author(s):  
LiGuo Yang ◽  
Chaoling Li ◽  
Lin Lu ◽  
Tai Guo
Keyword(s):  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Distribution System ◽  
Comprehensive Evaluation ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Logistics System ◽  
Marine Transportation ◽  
Logistics Distribution ◽  
Emergency Logistics ◽  
The Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The marine economy has become a growth point for the regional economy. International resource exchange is mainly achieved through marine transportation. Ports play a vital role in marine transportation and also play an important role in some large-scale international rescue activities. When an emergency occurs in the port, the port emergency logistics system has an important impact on the collection and distribution of materials, which can effectively reduce the negative impact and economic loss caused by the emergency. Through in-depth analysis of the emergency logistics system, design the comprehensive evaluation system of the port emergency logistics distribution system, and based on the characteristics of the grey, fuzzy and difficult to quantify the influencing factors of the emergency logistics distribution system, apply the analytic hierarchy process and grey system theory to establish the gray level comprehensive evaluation model of the port emergency logistics distribution system. In this model, the analytic hierarchy process is used to determine the index weight, and then the grey theory is used to comprehensively evaluate the emergency logistics distribution system. Finally, the port is used as a case to verify the practicability and effectiveness of the model.

scholarly journals Evaluation of banks’ commercial credit applications using the analytic hierarchy process and Grey relational analysis: A comparison between public and private banks

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 308-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeliha Kaygısız Ertuğ ◽  
Nuray Girginer
Keyword(s):  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Grey Relational Analysis ◽  
Evaluation Model ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Relational Analysis ◽  
Private Banks ◽  
The Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Grey Relational ◽  
Hierarchy Process

 The purpose of this study is to develop an evaluation model that considers the quantitative and qualitative criteria for the appropriate selection of firms demanding commercial credit for both public and private banks. In this paper, the authors propose an integrated model that combines the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) into a single evaluation model. The model is illustrated with a case study on bank experts to demonstrate the effectiveness of this integrated method for four firms that applied for a commercial loan. In this study, AHP is applied to determine the weight of the criteria, and GRA is performed to determine the most appropriate firm. The results of this study indicate that, whereas firm morality and news criteria are the main criteria with the highest priority, sale and marketing constructions are the main criteria with the lowest priorities for both public and private banks. In addition, according to the results of GRA, the most appropriate firm for a public bank is Firm 1, and the most appropriate firm for a private bank is Firm 2.

Application of Comprehensive Evaluation and Sensitive Analysis in Certain Equipment

2015 ◽  
Vol 713-715 ◽  
pp. 1622-1626
Author(s):  
Ning Xie ◽  
Shuai Li ◽  
Di Li ◽  
Xiao Fei Wang
Keyword(s):  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Comprehensive Evaluation ◽  
Fuzzy Evaluation ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Sensitive Analysis ◽  
Comprehensive Fuzzy Evaluation ◽  
Judgment Matrix ◽  
The Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Hierarchy Process

In this paper,it is mainly based on the characteristics of index of some equipment, analyses the correspondence between first class index and second class index, studies the calculation of weigh index. Several methods including linear weighted method, Comprehensive fuzzy evaluation method, and the fuzzy Borda method have been taken into account to improve the confirmable methods of judgment matrix in the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The analyses of three different eqiupment,A system,B system and C system, demonstrates that A system is the best unanimously.

Application of the analytic hierarchy process to sustainability of water supply and sanitation services: the case of Algeria

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 1282-1293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofiane Boukhari ◽  
Yassine Djebbar ◽  
Hocine Amarchi ◽  
Ali Sohani
Keyword(s):  
Water Supply ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Comprehensive Evaluation ◽  
Maintenance Cost ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Sanitation Services ◽  
Technical Performance ◽  
The Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Water Supply And Sanitation

Abstract The aim of this paper is to develop a methodological tool for comprehensive evaluation of sustainability of water supply and sanitation services (WSSs) considering all quantitative and qualitative effective factors using the analytic hierarchy process. The proposed method has a significant advantage that determines which aspects have more priority and which ones are less important; hence, it gives a very good guideline for planning and implementation of a country's projects for sustainable development in WSSs. Additionally, the application of the proposed method is shown for Algeria as a case study. six dimensions, 12 criteria and 50 indicators were defined as three different levels of hierarchy for this purpose. Moreover, the matrices of pairwise comparisons were obtained by judgments of 12 experts in different involved fields including policy makers, managers and scientists. According to the results, the most important dimensions were economic (38.3%) and technical (26.1%) aspects. Furthermore, the financial autonomy (18.7%) and technical performance (18.4%) had the highest and transparency (2%) and organization (2.8%) had the lowest weights among all criteria. In addition, indicators with a high overall weight are: operation and maintenance cost, grand balanced budget, reliability, small budget balance, opportunity cost and state subsidy rates for investments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document