scholarly journals High-Grade Ovarian Serous Carcinoma Presenting as Androgenetic Alopecia

2020 ◽  
Vol 106 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Eversman ◽  
Elisabeth Tracey ◽  
Christine B. Warren
2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 1201-1207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Louise Moss ◽  
Tim Evans ◽  
Philippa Pearmain ◽  
Sarah Askew ◽  
Kavita Singh ◽  
...  

IntroductionThe dualistic theory of ovarian carcinogenesis proposes that epithelial “ovarian” cancer is not one entity with several histological subtypes but a collection of different diseases arising from cells of different origin, some of which may not originate in the ovarian surface epithelium.MethodsAll cases referred to the Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre with an ovarian, tubal, or primary peritoneal cancer between April 2006 and April 2012 were identified from the West Midlands Cancer Registry. Tumors were classified into type I (low-grade endometrioid, clear cell, mucinous, and low-grade serous) and type II (high-grade serous, high-grade endometrioid, carcinosarcoma, and undifferentiated) cancers.ResultsOvarian (83.5%), tubal (4.3%), or primary peritoneal carcinoma (12.2%) were diagnosed in a total of 583 woman. The ovarian tumors were type I in 134 cases (27.5%), type II in 325 cases (66.7%), and contained elements of both type I and type II tumors in 28 cases (5.7%). Most tubal and primary peritoneal cases, however, were type II tumors: 24 (96.0%) and 64 (90.1%), respectively. Only 16 (5.8%) of the ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas were stage I at diagnosis, whereas 240 (86.6%) were stage III+. Overall survival varied between the subtypes when matched for stage. Stage III low-grade serous and high-grade serous carcinomas had a significantly better survival compared to clear cell and mucinous cases,P= 0.0134. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the high-grade serous ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal carcinomas when matched for stage (stage III,P= 0.3758; stage IV,P= 0.4820).ConclusionsType II tumors are more common than type I and account for most tubal and peritoneal cancers. High-grade serous carcinomas, whether classified as ovarian/tubal/peritoneal, seem to behave as one disease entity with no significant difference in survival outcomes, therefore supporting the proposition of a separate classification of “tubo-ovarian serous carcinoma”.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. A. Gubbels ◽  
Elizabeth M. Hultgren ◽  
Jessica Johnson ◽  
Emily Johnson ◽  
Jeffrey Sachs ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. 98-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florence A. Arts ◽  
Lisa Keogh ◽  
Paul Smyth ◽  
Sharon O'Toole ◽  
Robert Ta ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 2006-2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nataša Kenda Šuster ◽  
Snježana Frković Grazio ◽  
Irma Virant-Klun ◽  
Ivan Verdenik ◽  
Špela Smrkolj

ObjectiveThe objectives of this study were to assess cancer stem cell–related marker NANOG expression in ovarian serous tumors and to evaluate its prognostic significance in relation to ovarian serous carcinoma.MethodsNANOG protein expression was immunohistochemically evaluated in the ovarian tissue microarrays of 20 patients with benign ovarian serous tumors, 30 patients with borderline ovarian serous tumors, and 109 patients with ovarian serous carcinomas, from which 106 were of high-grade and 3 of low-grade morphology Immunohistochemical reaction was scored according to signal intensity and the percentage of positive cells in tumor samples. Pursuant to our summation of signal intensity and positive cell occurrence, we divided our samples into 4 groups: NANOG-negative, NANOG–slightly positive, NANOG–moderately positive, and NANOG–strongly positive group. Complete clinical data were obtained for the ovarian serous carcinoma group, and correlation between clinical data and NANOG expression was analyzed.ResultsA specific brown nuclear, or cytoplasmic reaction, was considered a positive NANOG staining. In terms of the ovarian serous carcinoma group, 69.7% were NANOG positive, 22.9% slightly positive, 22.9% moderately positive, and 23.9% strongly positive. All NANOG-positive cases were of high-grade morphology. Benign and borderline tumors and low-grade serous carcinomas were NANOG negative. There was no significant correlation between NANOG expression and clinical parameters in terms of the ovarian serous carcinoma group.ConclusionsPositive NANOG expression is significantly associated with high-grade ovarian serous carcinoma and is absent in benign, borderline, and low-grade serous lesions. In our study, there was no correlation between NANOG expression and clinical parameters, including its use in the prognosis of ovarian serous carcinoma.


2020 ◽  
Vol 156 (3) ◽  
pp. 662-668
Author(s):  
Sharareh Siamakpour-Reihani ◽  
Lauren Patterson Cobb ◽  
Chen Jiang ◽  
Dadong Zhang ◽  
Rebecca A. Previs ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 198-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulette Mhawech-Fauceglia ◽  
Dan Wang ◽  
Damanzoopinder Samrao ◽  
Heidi Godoy ◽  
Faith Ough ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document