Letrozole versus Clomiphene Citrate for Ovulation Induction before Intrauterine Insemination in Patients with Unexplained Infertility

2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 511-522
Author(s):  
Kamel N. A. Nour El-Deen ◽  
Abdulrahman M. Anbar ◽  
El Sayed M. Taha
Keyword(s):  
Ovulation Induction ◽  
Intrauterine Insemination ◽  
Clomiphene Citrate ◽  
Unexplained Infertility

A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Optimal Treatment for Unexplained Infertility

2021 ◽  
pp. 246-250
Author(s):  
Stephanie Rothenberg ◽  
Joseph Sanfilippo
Keyword(s):  
Ovulation Induction ◽  
Treatment Approach ◽  
Intrauterine Insemination ◽  
Clomiphene Citrate ◽  
Unexplained Infertility ◽  
Additional Benefit ◽  
Multiple Gestation ◽  
Time To Pregnancy ◽  
Vitro Fertilization

The treatment of unexplained infertility has traditionally been comprised of a stepwise treatment approach, first with ovulation induction combined with intrauterine insemination (IUI) and then with in vitro fertilization (IVF). Ovulation induction is first attempted with clomiphene citrate, and, if unsuccessful, injectable gonadotropins are used. The value of ovulation induction with injectable gonadotropins in couples with unexplained infertility has been questioned, however, given the high risk of multiple gestation and the increasing efficacy of IVF. To address this, the FASTT trial randomized couples with unexplained infertility to a treatment arm that either included or omitted gonadotropin/IUI. They found that an accelerated treatment approach that involved 3 cycles of clomiphene citrate/IUI and then progressed immediately to IVF resulted in a decreased time to pregnancy compared to the group who underwent gonadotropin/IUI for 3 cycles, as well as decreased cost per live birth. Therefore, it was concluded that treatment of couples with unexplained infertility with gonadotropin/IUI was of no additional benefit.

Infertility Treatment: Ovulation Induction and Insemination

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quinton Katler ◽  
Jessica R Zolton ◽  
Alan H. DeCherney
Keyword(s):  
Ovulation Induction ◽  
Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome ◽  
Intrauterine Insemination ◽  
Semen Analysis ◽  
Clomiphene Citrate ◽  
Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism ◽  
Unexplained Infertility ◽  
Male Factor ◽  
Ovarian Syndrome

For the majority of infertility patients, ovulation induction is the initial therapy. Treatment is individualized for a couple based on ovarian reserve testing, semen analysis, and the presence of anatomic pathology. Candidates for ovulation induction include those who are anovulatory and couples with unexplained infertility. The majority of patients diagnosed with anovulation have polycystic ovarian syndrome. Treatment options include clomiphene citrate and letrozole. For patients with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, treatment involves injections with gonadotropins. Treatment is typically combined with intrauterine insemination to maximize pregnancy rates, especially in patients with male factor infertility or unexplained infertility. A stepwise approach is necessary, as patients who are unsuccessful with less invasive and costly treatments may eventually require in vitro fertilization. This review contains 7 figures, 3 tables and 57 references Key Words: clomiphene citrate, gonadotropins, infertility, intrauterine insemination, letrozole, ovulation induction, polycystic ovarian syndrome, unexplained infertility

scholarly journals A study for evaluation of two protocols comprising of clomiphene citrate, human menopausal gonadotropin with or without follicle stimulating hormone for ovulation induction in patients with infertility for intrauterine insemination

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 2487
Author(s):  
Ashok Verma ◽  
Shivani Sharma ◽  
Suresh Verma ◽  
Pankaj Sharma ◽  
Tenzin Tsamo Tenga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Menstrual Cycle ◽  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Ovulation Induction ◽  
Endometrial Thickness ◽  
Intrauterine Insemination ◽  
Clomiphene Citrate ◽  
Human Menopausal Gonadotropin ◽  
Multiple Gestation ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: To compare two protocols comprising of FSH/CC/HMG and CC/HMG for ovulation induction and IUI in women with infertility.Methods: 60 women with unexplained infertility were randomized using sequentially numbered opaque envelope method. Group A received inj FSH 150 units on day 2 of menstrual cycle and clomiphene citrate 100 mg from day 3-7, followed by injection HMG 150 units on day 9 of menstrual cycle. Group B received clomiphene citrate 100 mg from day 3-7, and HMG 150 units on day 7 and 9 of the menstrual cycle.  Ovulation triggered with hCG 5000 units when dominant follicle was 18mm. Single IUI was done 36-42 hours afterwards.Results: Pregnancy occurred in 3 out of 30 women in 116 cycles Group A (with FSH) with a pregnancy rate of 10 percent, and 2.8% per cycle. In group B (without FSH) pregnancy occurred in 3 out of 30 women in 117 cycles with pregnancy rate of 10 percent, and 2.6% per cycle. The number of follicles per cycle was 1.36 and follicle size was 18.57 mm in group A. While in Group B numbers of follicles per cycle were 1.22, with average size of 18.9mm. Mean endometrial thickness was 7.7mm in Group A and 6.37 in Group B (p=.01, significant). Mild OHSS was observed in one woman in Group B. No other side effects were observed in both the groups.Conclusions: The controlled ovarian stimulation regimes used in this study are equally effective, easy to administer, require less intensive monitoring and fewer medications, with little risk of OHSS and multiple gestation.

scholarly journals The Study on Different Ovulation Induction Protocols used for Intrauterine Insemination and their Pregnancy Rate in Infertile Couples

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 73-82
Author(s):  
Yaminipriya Devarajlu Dhivya Venkatesan ◽  
Balachandar Vellingiri Ravimanickam Thangarasu ◽  
Sarat Battina
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Ovulation Induction ◽  
Intrauterine Insemination ◽  
Clomiphene Citrate ◽  
Human Menopausal Gonadotropin ◽  
Fertility Drugs ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

Infertility affects millions of people of reproductive age worldwide and has an impact on their families and communities. Infertility is a disease of male or female reproductive system defined by failure to achieve a pregnancy after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sexual intercourse. Infertility is treated by different fertility drugs, ovulation induction (OI), intrauterine insemination (IUI) and in-vitro fertilization (IVF). The aim of the study is to find out the significant difference in pregnancy rate with different OI protocols used for IUI. OI is the first line treatment given to infertile women. In OI, medications are given to women for egg development and for release of eggs. OI is monitored by follicular study by ultrasonography. Semen is collected from the male partner and processed with culture media to retrieve high motile sperms, which are injected into the uterus of the female. A prospective randomized study was performed among 1343 IUI cycles. OI is started on Day 2 or Day 3 of the menstrual cycle. OI protocol is grouped according to the fertility drugs used for stimulation. The fertility drugs used for the stimulation are Clomiphene Citrate, Letrozole, Recombinant Gonadotropins, Human menopausal Gonadotropins (HMG), Human chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG). Group A uses Clomiphene citrate and HCG, Group B uses Clome, recombinant Gonadotropins and HCG. Group C uses Clome, Human menopausal Gonadotropin and HCG; Group D uses Letrozole and HCG. Group E uses Letrozole recombinant Gonadotropin and HCG. Group F used Letrozole, Human menopausal Gonadotropin and HCG. Group G used recombinant Gonadotropin and HCG. Group H used Human menopausal Gonadotropin and HCG. Group I uses only HCG. Group J was a natural cycle monitoring without any medication and was used as a control. Pregnancy rates were calculated for different age groups with different protocols. The result shows that Group B had 13% pregnancy, Group C had 9%, Group D had 3%, Group E had 10%, Group G had 11%, Group G had 11%, Group H had 7%, Group I had 4%, and Group J had 8% of pregnancy rate. The statistical analysis shows there is no significant difference with different stimulation protocols used.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document