Portfolio Choices with Many Big Models

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Anderson ◽  
Ai-ru (Meg) Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Portfolio Choice ◽  
Regime Change ◽  
Model Misspecification ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Vector Autoregressive ◽  
Explanatory Variables ◽  
Portfolio Choices ◽  
Choice Strategy ◽  
Out Of Sample ◽  
Bayesian Averaging

This paper proposes a Bayesian-averaging heterogeneous vector autoregressive portfolio choice strategy with many big models that outperforms existing methods out-of-sample on numerous daily, weekly, and monthly datasets. The strategy assumes that excess returns are approximately determined by a time-varying regression with a large number of explanatory variables that are the sample means of past returns. Investors consider the possibility that every period there is a regime change by keeping track of many models, but doubt that any specification is able to perfectly predict the distribution of future returns, and compute portfolio choices that are robust to model misspecification. This paper was accepted by Tyler Shumway, finance.

Humans, Econs and Portfolio Choice

2016 ◽  
Vol 07 (02) ◽  
pp. 1750001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Best ◽  
Robert R. Grauer
Keyword(s):  
Prospect Theory ◽  
Portfolio Choice ◽  
Loss Aversion ◽  
Asset Allocation ◽  
Power Utility ◽  
Numerical Example ◽  
Portfolio Choices ◽  
Out Of Sample ◽  
Finance Theory ◽  
Mean Variance

We compare the portfolio choices of Humans — prospect theory investors — to the portfolio choices of Econs — power utility and mean-variance (MV) investors. In a numerical example, prospect theory portfolios are decidedly unreasonable. In an in-sample asset allocation setting, the prospect theory results are consistent with myopic loss aversion. However, the portfolios are extremely unstable. The power utility and MV results are consistent with traditional finance theory, where the portfolios are stable across decision horizons. In an out-of-sample asset allocation setting, the power utility and portfolios outperform the prospect theory portfolios. Nonetheless the prospect theory portfolios with loss aversion coefficients of 2.25 and 2 perform well.

scholarly journals Triple the Gamma—A Unifying Shrinkage Prior for Variance and Variable Selection in Sparse State Space and TVP Models

Econometrics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
Annalisa Cadonna ◽  
Sylvia Frühwirth-Schnatter ◽  
Peter Knaus
Keyword(s):  
Bayesian Model Averaging ◽  
Model Averaging ◽  
Predictive Performance ◽  
Outcome Variable ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Bayesian Lasso ◽  
Vector Autoregressive ◽  
Explanatory Variables ◽  
Time Varying Parameter ◽  
Shrinkage Prior

Time-varying parameter (TVP) models are very flexible in capturing gradual changes in the effect of explanatory variables on the outcome variable. However, in particular when the number of explanatory variables is large, there is a known risk of overfitting and poor predictive performance, since the effect of some explanatory variables is constant over time. We propose a new prior for variance shrinkage in TVP models, called triple gamma. The triple gamma prior encompasses a number of priors that have been suggested previously, such as the Bayesian Lasso, the double gamma prior and the Horseshoe prior. We present the desirable properties of such a prior and its relationship to Bayesian Model Averaging for variance selection. The features of the triple gamma prior are then illustrated in the context of time varying parameter vector autoregressive models, both for simulated dataset and for a series of macroeconomics variables in the Euro Area.

Optimal Hedge Ratio and Hedging Effectiveness in Stock Futures Market: Evidence from National Stock Exchange, India

2019 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-152
Author(s):  
A. Shanthi ◽  
R. Thamilselvan
Keyword(s):  
Banking Sector ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Futures Market ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Hedge Ratio ◽  
Hedging Effectiveness ◽  
Out Of Sample ◽  
Optimal Hedge

The major objective of the study is to examine the performance of optimal hedge ratio and hedging effectiveness in stock futures market in National Stock Exchange, India by estimating the following econometric models like Ordinary Least Square (OLS), Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) and time varying Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (MGARCH) model by evaluating in sample observation and out of sample observations for the period spanning from 1st January 2011 till 31st March 2018 by accommodating sixteen stock futures retrieved through www.nseindia.com by considering banking sector of Indian economy. The findings of the study indicate both the in sample and out of sample hedging performances suggest the various strategies obtained through the time varying optimal hedge ratio, which minimizes the conditional variance performs better than the employed alterative models for most of the underlying stock futures contracts in select banking sectors in India. Moreover, the study also envisage about the model selection criteria is most important for appropriate hedge ratio through risk averse investors. Finally, the research work is also in line with the previous attempts Myers (1991), Baillie and Myers (1991) and Park and Switzer (1995a, 1995b) made in the US markets

scholarly journals Forecasting Cattle Prices in the Presence of Structural Change

1992 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry K. Goodwin
Keyword(s):  
Structural Change ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Arima Model ◽  
Var Model ◽  
Impulse Response Functions ◽  
Cattle Industry ◽  
Vector Autoregressive ◽  
Economic Relationships ◽  
New Information ◽  
Out Of Sample

AbstractRecent empirical research and developments in the cattle industry suggest several reasons to suspect structural change in economic relationships determining cattle prices. Standard forecasting models may ignore structural change and may produce biased and misleading forecasts. Vector autoregressive (VAR) models that allow parameters to vary with time are used to forecast quarterly cattle prices. The VAR procedures are flexible in that they allow the identification of structural change that begins at an a priori unknown point and occurs gradually. The results indicate that the lowest RMSE for out-of-sample forecasts of cattle prices is obtained using a gradually switching VAR model. However, differences between the gradually switching VAR model and a univariate ARIMA model are not strongly significant. Impulse response functions indicate that adjustments of cattle prices to new information have become faster in recent years.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document