scholarly journals Frequency of First-Year Student Interactions With Advisors

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Fosnacht ◽  
Alexander C. McCormick ◽  
Jennifer N. Nailos ◽  
Amy K. Ribera
Keyword(s):  
Academic Advising ◽  
Institutional Characteristics ◽  
First Year ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Academic Advisors ◽  
Student Interactions ◽  
First Year Students ◽  
Institutional Types ◽  
Using Data ◽  
First Year Student

Although acknowledged that academic advising helps students adjust to and deal with the challenges of college, little is known about students' frequency of interactions with advisors. Using data from 52,546 full-time, first-year students at 209 diverse institutions, we examined the frequency with which students met with academic advisors and the way these interactions vary by student and institutional characteristics. We found that the typical first-year student met with an advisor 1 to 3 times during his or her first college year; however, the number of meetings varied across student subpopulations and institutional types.

scholarly journals Measuring the Differential Effects of Behaviors of Academic Advisors for Students with Disabilities

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-32
Author(s):  
John Zilvinskis ◽  
Renae E. Barber ◽  
Johanna L. Brozinsky ◽  
Shelby R. Hochberg
Keyword(s):  
General Population ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Academic Advising ◽  
Multilevel Models ◽  
Social Stigma ◽  
Large Data ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Institutional Characteristics ◽  
First Year ◽  
First Year Students

In prior scholarship, researchers identified barriers students with disabilities encounter in accessing academic advising, such as social stigma and hesitance to disclose. Through our study, we sought to inform advising practice by exposing the perceived deficit in services toward this population, uniquely evidenced by large data. The National Survey of Student Engagement academic advising data from 55,945 first-year students and 260 institutions were analyzed through multilevel models to measure differences in academic advising behaviors toward students with disabilities (10.12%) and the general population based on student self-reporting. Results illustrate that even when accounting for student backgrounds and institutional characteristics, academic advising behaviors were perceived as lower for students with disabilities, highlighting the need to intentionally improve services for these students.

scholarly journals Qualitative Analysis of Student Perceptions: “Some Advisors Care. Some Don't.”

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 44-54
Author(s):  
Ruth V. Walker ◽  
Alexandra I. Zelin ◽  
Carolyn Behrman ◽  
Rachel Strnad
Keyword(s):  
Student Perceptions ◽  
Academic Advising ◽  
State Institution ◽  
Transition To College ◽  
Guidance Counselors ◽  
First Year ◽  
Perceived Effectiveness ◽  
First Year Students ◽  
Individual Interviews ◽  
School Guidance

University-based academic advising at a large, Great Lakes state institution was designed to support first-year students' transition to college. We conducted individual interviews and facilitated story circles with 162 students to determine their perceived effectiveness of advising. Analyses revealed four overarching themes: student difficulty making the distinction between roles of high school guidance counselors and postsecondary academic advisors, advisor communication, student desire for a relationship, and advisor accessibility. On the basis of data gathered, we developed a model for understanding the formation and maintenance of student advising perceptions.

scholarly journals Designing for Students: Creating a Robust Interdisciplinary First Year Course

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah E. Bordelon ◽  
Colleen M Sexton ◽  
Ann M Vendrely
Keyword(s):  
General Education ◽  
Course Design ◽  
Natural World ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
First Year ◽  
Full Time ◽  
First Year Students ◽  
Underserved Students ◽  
General Education Curriculum

Building a general education program from scratch for a population of first generation and underserved students provided both a challenge and opportunity. Faculty who had limited previous experience teaching and assessing first year students engaged in study of the best practices and research. Faculty designed a four-year general education curriculum that began with a robust First Year Seminar (FYS) course, the focus of this study. This required three-credit hour interdisciplinary humanities course (FYS) was designed to embrace the understanding of what it means to be human, including understanding oneself in relation to the natural world and to others. Full time faculty from all disciplines were selected through a competitive process to teach the FYS course with embedded High Impact Practices (HIPs). Four years of teaching FYS has provided qualitative and quantitative data on the effectiveness of the design, the role of faculty, and application of HIPs. Through the course assessment process and data analysis, faculty have expanded their repertoire of pedagogical strategies to engage the first year student, and as a result, positively influenced teaching in their other courses. This report offers insights on strategies for course design, the role of faculty, and the power of selected HIPs that may be replicated at other institutions.

Study of Discontinuing Students at Macquarie University

1976 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Baumgart
Keyword(s):  
First Year ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Process Variables ◽  
Design Problems ◽  
First Year Students ◽  
Part Time Students ◽  
Part Time ◽  
Discriminant Analyses ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Second Year

In a study of discontinuing students at Macquarie University major analyses were based on a sample of 444 students divided into four categories: students still persisting in Term 3 of second year, students who discontinued during first year, students who voluntarily discontinued after first year, and students excluded because of failure at the end of first year. Multiple discriminant analyses were used to relate potential predictors to category membership. Predictors included both entry and process variables. Results are reported separately for full-time and part-time students, and for males and females within these categories. The major findings carry implications for those who need to make management decisions in relation to higher education. Additionally, the paper attempts to highlight some of the design problems inherent in correlational studies and to present selected methodological strategies used in this study to minimize the effects of these problems.

Increasing Voluntary Student-Advisor Contacts

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn A. Schnell
Keyword(s):  
North Dakota ◽  
Academic Advising ◽  
Student Participation ◽  
First Year ◽  
Academic Advisors ◽  
State University ◽  
Student Advisor ◽  
North Dakota State University ◽  
First Year Seminar

This study examines a method for increasing voluntary student participation in the academic advising process. During a first-year seminar required of all students entering North Dakota State University, advisor contacts were measured for students whose course instructors served as their academic advisors and compared them with those of students assigned to other advisors. Results indicated that students whose instructors also served as their academic advisors voluntar­ily attended advising sessions significantly more often than those who were assigned to advisors with whom they were unfamiliar.

scholarly journals The ‘Double Transition’ for First-Year Students: Understanding the Impact of Covid-19 on South Africa’s First-Year University Students

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-92
Author(s):  
Annsilla Nyar
Keyword(s):  
University Students ◽  
First Year ◽  
First Year Students ◽  
Student Transition ◽  
Double Transition ◽  
First Year University ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Academic Cycle ◽  
Special Category ◽  
First Year Student

While all students are affected by the advent of the Covid‑19 pandemic, the first‑year student population remains a special category of vulnerability for higher education. This is on account of the way the Covid‑19 pandemic has disrupted their transition into university and complicated the nature of their entry into and through the formal academic cycle. This article uses the notion of a ‘double transition’ as a framework for positioning and locating the first‑year student transition within the context of the prevailing Covid‑19 pandemic. ‘Double transition’ refers to an additional transition coupled with that of the first‑year transition, with regard to the extraordinary situation of students navigating their entry into the unfamiliar terrain of academia while simultaneously navigating the Covid‑19 pandemic. The article provides a circumscribed summary of the effects of Covid‑19 on university students and looks to describe and explain the nature and shape of first‑year transitions in relation to the transition necessitated by the Covid‑19 pandemic. It concludes with four key strategies for supporting first‑year students as the pandemic continues.

scholarly journals Strengths-Based Advising Approaches: Benefits for First-Year Undergraduates

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krista M. Soria ◽  
Nicole L. Laumer ◽  
Dale J. Morrow ◽  
Garrett Marttinen
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Student Success ◽  
Academic Advising ◽  
First Year ◽  
Matched Pairs ◽  
Self Awareness ◽  
First Year Students ◽  
First Year Retention ◽  
Matching Techniques ◽  
Academic Self Efficacy

We explored the benefits of strengths-based academic advising approaches for first-year students (N = 1,228). We used propensity score matching techniques to create matched pairs of students who did and did not engage in strengths-based advising conversations with an advisor. First-year students who experienced strengths-based conversations had significantly higher rates of first-year retention and graduation in 4 years, levels of engagement, and academic self-efficacy than students who did not participate in these conversations. Focus groups of 21 advisors provided insights into strengths-based advising in 3 findings: strengths approaches facilitated advising relationships (thereby supporting students' engagement, retention, and graduation), enhanced students' self-awareness and confidence, and advanced advisors' own personal and professional development (thereby positively influencing student success).

Faculty Pilot First-Year Experience for Incoming Freshmen Interested in Pursuing a Degree in Education

2017 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Keyword(s):  
Social Adjustment ◽  
Collaborative Work ◽  
Faculty Members ◽  
First Year Experience ◽  
First Year ◽  
Full Time ◽  
First Year Students ◽  
Course Structure ◽  
Reading And Writing ◽  
Incoming Freshmen

In this opening chapter, the researchers, three full-time college faculty members, discuss the initial focus of their collaborative work and research. Driven by the concerns regarding the reading and writing abilities of students entering their programs and across their campus, they responded to this issue by establishing and co-teaching yearlong linked courses to incoming first-year students interested in education, a pilot that eventually became known as the First-Year Reading, Thinking, and Writing Initiative. The data collected from the first few years of the Initiative indicate the benefits of having a year-long linked course structure for this population of students to promote academic achievement, social adjustment, and, as the researchers learned through this experience, civic engagement.

scholarly journals Baseline Characteristics of the 2015-2019 First Year Student Cohorts of the NIH Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD ) Program

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 681-692
Author(s):  
Keith C. Norris ◽  
Heather E. McCreath ◽  
Karsten Hueffer ◽  
Stephen B. Aley ◽  
Gabriela Chavira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Income ◽  
Alaska Native ◽  
National Policy ◽  
First Year ◽  
Biomedical Sciences ◽  
First Year Students ◽  
Primary Student ◽  
Student Cohorts ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
First Year Student

Objective: The biomedical/behavioral sciences lag in the recruitment and ad­vancement of students from historically underrepresented backgrounds. In 2014 the NIH created the Diversity Program Consortium (DPC), a prospective, multi-site study comprising 10 Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD) institutional grantees, the National Research Mentor­ing Network (NRMN) and a Coordination and Evaluation Center (CEC). This article describes baseline characteristics of four incoming, first-year student cohorts at the primary BUILD institutions who completed the Higher Education Research Institute, The Freshmen Survey between 2015-2019. These freshmen are the primary student cohorts for longitudinal analyses comparing outcomes of BUILD program participants and non-participants.Design: Baseline description of first-year students entering college at BUILD institu­tions during 2015-2019.Setting: Ten colleges/universities that each received <$7.5mil/yr in NIH Research Project Grants and have high proportions of low-income students.Participants: First-year undergraduate stu­dents who participated in BUILD-sponsored activities and a sample of non-BUILD stu­dents at the same BUILD institutions. A total of 32,963 first-year students were enrolled in the project; 64% were female, 18% His­panic/Latinx, 19% African American/Black, 2% American Indian/Alaska Native and Na­tive Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, 17% Asian, and 29% White. Twenty-seven percent were from families with an income <$30,000/yr and 25% were their family’s first generation in college.Planned Outcomes: Primary student outcomes to be evaluated over time include undergraduate biomedical degree comple­tion, entry into/completion of a graduate biomedical degree program, and evidence of excelling in biomedical research and scholarship.Conclusions: The DPC national evaluation has identified a large, longitudinal cohort of students with many from groups histori­cally underrepresented in the biomedical sciences that will inform institutional/ national policy level initiatives to help diversify the biomedical workforce.Ethn Dis. 2020;30(4):681-692; doi:10.18865/ed.30.4.681

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document