Utility of the Boston Naming Test in Differentiating between Mild Cognitive Impairment and Normal Elderly: A Meta-Analysis

This article discusses the potential of three assessments of language function in the diagnosis of Alzheimer-type dementia (DAT). A total of 115 patients (mean age 65.9 years) attending a memory clinic were assessed using three language tests: a picture description task (Boston Cookie-Theft picture), the Boston Naming Test, and a semantic and phonemic word fluency measure. Results of these assessments were compared with those of clinical diagnosis including the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS). The patients were classified by ICD-10 diagnosis and GDS stage as without cognitive impairment (n = 40), mild cognitive impairment (n = 34), mild DAT (n = 21), and moderate to severe DAT (n = 20). Hypotheses were (a) that the complex task of a picture description could more readily identify language disturbances than specific language tests and that (b) examination of spontaneous speech could help to identify patients with even mild forms of DAT. In the picture description task, all diagnostic groups produced an equal number of words. However, patients with mild or moderate to severe DAT described significantly fewer objects and persons, actions, features, and localizations than patients without or with mild cognitive impairment. Persons with mild cognitive impairment had results similar to those without cognitive impairment. The Boston Naming Test and both fluency measures were superior to the picture description task in differentiating the diagnostic groups. In sum, both hypotheses had to be rejected. Our results confirm that DAT patients have distinct semantic speech disturbances whereas they are not impaired in the amount of produced speech.

Download Full-text

Coordinated and circumlocutory semantic naming errors are related to anterolateral temporal lobes in mild AD, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and normal aging

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society ◽

10.1017/s1355617710000998 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 16 (6) ◽

pp. 1099-1107 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

MARCIO LUIZ FIGUEREDO BALTHAZAR ◽

CLARISSA LIN YASUDA ◽

FABRÍCIO RAMOS SILVESTRE PEREIRA ◽

FELIPE PAULO GUAZZI BERGO ◽

FERNANDO CENDES ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cognitive Impairment ◽

Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽

Temporal Lobe ◽

Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽

Boston Naming Test ◽

Gray Matter Density ◽

Temporal Lobes ◽

Functional Gradient ◽

Minimal Gradient ◽

Naming Test

AbstractNaming difficulties are characteristic of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and, to a lesser extent, of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) patients. The association of naming impairment with anterior temporal lobe (ATL) atrophy in Semantic Dementia (SD) could be a tip of the iceberg effect, in which case the atrophy is a marker of more generalized temporal lobe pathology. Alternatively, it could reflect the existence of a functional gradient within the temporal lobes, wherein more anterior regions provide the basis for greater specificity of representation. We tested these two hypotheses in a study of 15 subjects with mild AD, 17 with aMCI, and 16 aged control subjects and showed that coordinate and circumlocutory semantic error production on the Boston Naming Test was weakly correlated with ATL gray matter density, as determined by voxel-based morphometry. Additionally, we investigated whether these errors were benefited by phonemic cues, and similarly to SD, our AD patients had small improvement. Because there is minimal gradient of temporal lobe atrophy in AD or MCI, and, therefore, no basis for a tip of the iceberg effect, these findings support the theory of a modest functional gradient in the temporal lobes, with the ATLs being involved in the naming of more specific objects. (JINS, 2010, 16, 1099–1107.)

Download Full-text

Supplemental Material for Risk of Progression to Alzheimer’s Disease for Different Neuropsychological Mild Cognitive Impairment Subtypes: A Hierarchical Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies

Psychology and Aging ◽

10.1037/pag0000294.supp ◽

2018 ◽

Keyword(s):

Alzheimer’S Disease ◽

Alzheimer's Disease ◽

Cognitive Impairment ◽

Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽

Longitudinal Studies ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Risk Of Progression

Download Full-text

Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment in patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hypertension Research ◽

10.1038/s41440-021-00704-3 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Jiawei Qin ◽

Zexiang He ◽

Lijian Wu ◽

Wanting Wang ◽

Qiuxiang Lin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Cognitive Impairment ◽

Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽

Meta Analysis

Download Full-text

The Prevalence of Mild Cognitive Impairment among Chinese People: A Meta-Analysis

Neuroepidemiology ◽

10.1159/000512597 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 55 (2) ◽

pp. 79-91

Author(s):

Yan Deng ◽

Siqi Zhao ◽

Guangwen Cheng ◽

Jiajia Yang ◽

Benchao Li ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cognitive Impairment ◽

Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽

Diagnostic Criteria ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Random Effect ◽

Random Effect Model ◽

Internal Validity ◽

Screening Tools ◽

Chinese Elderly ◽

Pooled Prevalence

Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) induced the majority number of dementia patients. The prevalence of MCI in China varied across studies with different screening tools and diagnostic criteria. Objective: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the pooled MCI prevalence among the population aged 55 years and older in China. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI, Wanfang, CQVIP, and CBMdisc were searched for studies on prevalence of MCI among Chinese elderly between January 1, 1980, and February 10, 2020. The quality assessment was conducted via external validity, internal validity, and informativity, the pooled prevalence was calculated through the random-effect model, and the homogeneity was evaluated by Cochran’s Q test and I2. Results: Fifty-three studies with 123,766 subjects were included. The pooled prevalence of MCI among Chinese elderly was 15.4% (95% CI: 13.5–17.4%). Subgroup analyses indicated that the prevalence calculated with different screening tools was 20.2% (95% CI: 15.1–25.9%) for Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and 13.0% (95% CI: 10.7–15.5%) for Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). According to different diagnostic criteria, the prevalence was 14.8% (95% CI: 12.2–17.6%) for Petersen criteria, 15.0% (95% CI: 12.7–17.5%) for DSM-IV, and 21.2% (95% CI: 17.5–25.2%) for Chinese Expert Consensus on Cognitive Impairment (CECCI). Besides, women, older adults, illiterate people, rural residents, and those who lived with unhealthy lifestyles and morbidity showed higher prevalence. Conclusions: The prevalence of MCI in China was 15.4%, which varied by demographics, lifestyles, morbidity, screening tools, and diagnostic criteria. In further studies, screening tools and diagnosis criteria should be considered when estimating MCI prevalence.

Download Full-text