Minimal intervention dentistry and older patients part 2: minimally invasive operative interventions

Dental Update ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 500-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Hayes ◽  
Edith Allen ◽  
Cristiane da Mata ◽  
Gerald McKenna ◽  
Francis Burke
Dental Update ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 406-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Hayes ◽  
Edith Allen ◽  
Cristiane da Mata ◽  
Gerald McKenna ◽  
Francis Burke

Author(s):  
Imran Farooq ◽  
Zonera Imran ◽  
Umer Farooq

ABSTRACT Minimally invasive dentistry concept is now an essential part of dental procedures. Many novel materials and techniques have now been developed that are in line with the MI (minimal intervention) philosophy. One such technique is air abrasion. An attempt has been made in this article to cover all the aspects of air abrasion and to remove the misconceptions present about this technique.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 560-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Park ◽  
Kai-Ming Fu ◽  
Praveen V. Mummaneni ◽  
Juan S. Uribe ◽  
Michael Y. Wang ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEAchieving appropriate spinopelvic alignment in deformity surgery has been correlated with improvement in pain and disability. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques have been used to treat adult spinal deformity (ASD); however, there is concern for inadequate sagittal plane correction. Because age can influence the degree of sagittal correction required, the purpose of this study was to analyze whether obtaining optimal spinopelvic alignment is required in the elderly to obtain clinical improvement.METHODSA multicenter database of ASD patients was queried. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years; an MIS component as part of the index procedure; at least one of the following: pelvic tilt (PT) > 20°, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) > 50 mm, pelvic incidence to lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch > 10°, or coronal curve > 20°; and minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients were stratified into younger (< 65 years) and older (≥ 65 years) cohorts. Within each cohort, patients were categorized into aligned (AL) or mal-aligned (MAL) subgroups based on postoperative radiographic measurements. Mal-alignment was defined as a PI-LL > 10° or SVA > 50 mm. Pre- and postoperative radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared.RESULTSOf the 185 patients, 107 were in the younger cohort and 78 in the older cohort. Based on postoperative radiographs, 36 (33.6%) of the younger patients were in the AL subgroup and 71 (66.4%) were in the MAL subgroup. The older patients were divided into 2 subgroups based on alignment; there were 26 (33.3%) patients in the AL and 52 (66.7%) in the MAL subgroups. Overall, patients within both younger and older cohorts significantly improved with regard to postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. In the younger cohort, there were no significant differences in postoperative VAS back and leg pain scores between the AL and MAL subgroups. However, the postoperative ODI score of 37.9 in the MAL subgroup was significantly worse than the ODI score of 28.5 in the AL subgroup (p = 0.019). In the older cohort, there were no significant differences in postoperative VAS back and leg pain score or ODI between the AL and MAL subgroups.CONCLUSIONSMIS techniques did not achieve optimal spinopelvic alignment in most cases. However, age appears to impact the degree of sagittal correction required. In older patients, optimal spinopelvic alignment thresholds did not need to be achieved to obtain similar symptomatic improvement. Conversely, in younger patients stricter adherence to optimal spinopelvic alignment thresholds may be needed.https://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2018.4.SPINE171153


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (04) ◽  
pp. 353-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Floyd ◽  
Stephen W. Perkins

AbstractFacelift or rhytidectomy has been performed in some form for over 100 years. This article seeks to explore the evolution of this surgical procedure, focusing on the advances of the most recent 40 years. From minimal intervention to aggressive techniques and back to the minimally invasive again, the authors follow the journey of surgical intervention for facial rejuvenation and discuss some thoughts for the future.


2015 ◽  
Vol 139 ◽  
pp. 86-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasar Dagistan ◽  
Emine Dagistan ◽  
Ali Riza Gezici ◽  
Seçkin Emre Cancan ◽  
Murat Bilgi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document