EMG measurement and cognitive test evaluation when using a balance ball toward the development of an office chair for preventing back pain

Increasing numbers of people spend the majority of their working lives seated in an office chair. Musculoskeletal disorders, in particular low back pain, resulting from prolonged static sitting are ubiquitous, but regularly changing sitting position throughout the day is thought to reduce back problems. Nearly all currently available office chairs offer the possibility to alter the backrest reclination angles, but the influence of changing seating positions on the spinal column remains unknown. In an attempt to better understand the potential to adjust or correct spine posture using adjustable seating, five healthy subjects were analysed in an upright and reclined sitting position conducted in an open, upright MRI scanner. The shape of the spine, as described using the vertebral bodies’ coordinates, wedge angles, and curvature angles, showed high inter-subject variability between the two seating positions. The mean lumbar, thoracic, and cervical curvature angles were29±15°,-29±4°, and13±8° for the upright and33±12°,-31±7°, and7±7° for the reclined sitting positions. Thus, a wide range of seating adaptation is possible through modification of chair posture, and dynamic seating options may therefore provide a key feature in reducing or even preventing back pain caused by prolonged static sitting.

Download Full-text

Transient perceived back pain induced by prolonged sitting in a backless office chair: are biomechanical factors involved?

Ergonomics ◽

10.1080/00140139.2019.1661526 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 62 (11) ◽

pp. 1415-1425 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Ryan David Greene ◽

Mona Frey ◽

Samareh Attarsharghi ◽

John Charles Snow ◽

Matthew Barrett ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Back Pain ◽

Prolonged Sitting ◽

Biomechanical Factors ◽

Office Chair

Download Full-text

The lengths of spinal curvature stretch due to the angles of sitting on saddle chair to alleviate back pain: A statistical analysis

Work ◽

10.3233/wor-213433 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

Ramalingam Shanmugam

Keyword(s):

Spinal Cord ◽

Back Pain ◽

Statistical Approach ◽

Traditional Approach ◽

Spinal Curvature ◽

Sitting Position ◽

Statistical Methodology ◽

Proportional Effect ◽

Made In ◽

Office Chair

BACKGROUND: By dividing the burden of one’s weight between the shins and the buttocks in the sitting position on an office or saddle chair, a person can avoid back pain. In this 21st century, sitting on a chair for long hours in workplace on office chair is unavoidable necessity and hence, millions in different countries undergo a risk for backpain. Is there a right sitting position? OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to find out how much a correlation exists between the angle of sitting and the length of spinal curvature which is the source of backpain. An experiment can be designed and carried out to measure various angles in sitting and the changing length of the person’s length of spinal cord curvature. METHOD: The usual statistical methodology requires a pair of values namely x and y to quantify the correlation. The data on sitting angles and the length of spinal curvature do not have such pairing, and hence, the traditional approach to find the correlation between the sitting angle and length of spinal curvature is not applicable. Yet, an approach is necessary. This article constructs an innovative statistical approach to fulfil this need. RESULTS: Our approach yields a correlation of 0.998 for sitting on office chair and an increased correlation of 0.999 on saddle chair, according to the Truszczy'nska-Baszaka et al.’s data. CONCLUSIONS: An adjustment is made in various angles of sitting on office chair to transform the comfortable sitting on a saddle chair. In consequence, the proportional effect on the spinal curvature is estimable with the data and it is phenomenal (that is significantly more than one). No wonder people prefer saddle chair over office chair when it comes to avoid back pain and this article proves the convenience statistically.

Download Full-text

Nonspecific Chronic Back Pain: Sixth Edition Approaches

Guides Newsletter ◽

10.1001/amaguidesnewsletters.2019.sepoct03 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 24 (5) ◽

pp. 14-15

Author(s):

Jay Blaisdell ◽

James B. Talmage

Keyword(s):

Back Pain ◽

Chronic Back Pain ◽

Intervertebral Disk ◽

Key Factors ◽

Sixth Edition ◽

Whole Person ◽

Class 1 ◽

A Cell ◽

Intervertebral Disk Herniation ◽

The Individual

Abstract Ratings for “non-specific chronic, or chronic reoccurring, back pain” are based on the diagnosis-based impairment method whereby an impairment class, usually representing a range of impairment values within a cell of a grid, is selected by diagnosis and “specific criteria” (key factors). Within the impairment class, the default impairment value then can be modified using non-key factors or “grade modifiers” such as functional history, physical examination, and clinical studies using the net adjustment formula. The diagnosis of “nonspecific chronic, or chronic reoccurring, back pain” can be rated in class 0 and 1; the former has a default value of 0%, and the latter has a default value of 2% before any modifications. The key concept here is that the physician believes that the patient is experiencing pain, yet there are no related objective findings, most notably radiculopathy as distinguished from “nonverifiable radicular complaints.” If the individual is found not to have radiculopathy and the medical record shows that the patient has never had clinically verifiable radiculopathy, then the diagnosis of “intervertebral disk herniation and/or AOMSI [alteration of motion segment integrity] cannot be used.” If the patient is asymptomatic at maximum medical improvement, then impairment Class 0 should be chosen, not Class 1; a final whole person impairment rating of 1% indicates incorrect use of the methodology.

Download Full-text