scholarly journals Tax justice and the challenges of measuring illicit financial flows

2019 ◽  
pp. 103-114
Author(s):  
Richard Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Multinational Corporations ◽  
Multinational Corporation ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Tax Havens ◽  
Financial Flows ◽  
Corporation Tax ◽  
Illicit Financial Flows ◽  
Large Corporations ◽  
The Way

Multinational corporation tax avoidance is primarily about tax avoidance. That is, recording transactions in ways that are legal but which might not meet with the approval of the all the tax authorities who might be impacted by the way in which transactions are recorded are reported. This is most especially true of many transactions involving tax havens. The problem with tracing transactions recorded in these places has, however, been locating any data on them because if the accounting opacity that they create, which is also permitted by existing accounting standards for multinational corporations. Country-by-country reporting was created to tackle this opacity head-on by requiring that all large corporations report all their transactions wherever they might arise. The result could be far greater information on the illicit financial flows of major companies, or their potential elimination.

Curbing Illicit Financial Flows

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaodon Liang
Keyword(s):  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Developing Economies ◽  
International System ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Incentive Structure ◽  
Global Finance ◽  
Tax Havens ◽  
Financial Flows ◽  
Playing Field ◽  
Illicit Financial Flows

Illicit financial flows (IFFs) drain state finances and economic vitality, with disproportionate impact on developing economies. IFFs—including money laundering, tax evasion, and tax avoidance—pose a transnational problem addressed so far through international regimes of coordination and cooperation. But meaningful reductions in IFFs require addressing the root of the problem: information asymmetries. Developed nations and tax havens know where money is hidden and profits are made, while developing nations do not. Since the international system of global finance creates the incentive structure and permissive environment for illicit flows, it is at this level that states must focus their policy-making attention. New information-sharing mechanisms, such as automatic exchange of tax information and public country-by-country tax reporting, can level the playing field and enable lower-income states to effectively address the IFF problem.

scholarly journals Recharacterizing Corruption to Encompass Illicit Financial Flows

AJIL Unbound ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 113 ◽  
pp. 336-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Thuo Gathii
Keyword(s):  
Multinational Corporations ◽  
Transfer Pricing ◽  
Public Officials ◽  
Financial Flows ◽  
Development Agenda ◽  
Role Of The State ◽  
Illicit Financial Flows ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Private Actors

Anticorruption treaties generally define corruption as the abuse of entrusted power for private gain. As such, global anticorruption efforts primarily target transactions involving the bribery of governmental officials. The definition excludes transactions in which multinational corporations deprive developing states of revenue by failing to pay taxes and other monies due. Yet such transactions are equally injurious to the development agenda of poor states. This essay argues that corruption should be redefined to encompass illicit financial flows, a term used by a growing network of tax and economic justice groups to refer to money that is “illegally earned, transferred or used.” Transactions such as trade misinvoicing, base-erosion, and abusive transfer pricing to illegally earn additional income undermine the ability of poor states to raise revenue for development. Expanding the definition of corruption would create a more realistic picture of the role of corporate actors and their involvement in corrupt and illicit dealings. It would also bring equivalency to the treatment of corporate actors and public officials. By focusing on illicit dealings involving corporate actors, this essay challenges the partial definition of corruption adopted in the heyday of the Washington Consensus, when skepticism about the role of the state, rather than of private actors, prevailed.

Addressing illicit financial flows in Africa

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 1074-1091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Otto Schlenther
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
Profit Shifting ◽  
Financial Flows ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Priority Areas ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Illicit Financial Flows

Purpose This paper aims to identify the underlying key components of illicit financial flows (IFFs) and highlights the priority areas where government resources should be pooled under a whole of government approach to mitigate the risks posed by IFFs. These areas are tax avoidance and tax evasion (specifically intra-company profit shifting, investment and profit shifting within the extractive sector, fraud and beneficial ownership), anti-corruption measures, governance and accountability measures, anti-money laundering effectiveness and effectiveness in the detection of falsified customs declarations. Design/methodology/approach The concept of IFFs is emerging as an umbrella term for bringing together seemingly disconnected issues. The concept is ill-defined, but there are various identifiable components supporting the term IFF such as capital flight, corruption, money laundering, tax avoidance, tax havens and transfer pricing practices. The author identifies the key areas of concern through a literature review and recommends prioritization of short- to medium-term risk areas and long-term policy imperatives. Findings In the short- to medium-term, an effective “whole-of-government” approach should be based on uniform risk identification and prioritization between mandated government agencies and in the long run, it should be focused on building responsive and effective institutions through a process of good governance and effective taxation. Originality/value A large body of literature deals with “IFFs” and the “whole-of-government approach” as separate concepts. This paper draws on the existing literature and identifies priority areas for addressing IFFs, and, for these to be successful, they are entirely dependent on a whole-of-government approach – both in the short and long run.

scholarly journals Illicit financial flows and the Global South: A review of methods and evidence

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kasper Brandt
Keyword(s):  
Multinational Enterprises ◽  
The United States ◽  
Global South ◽  
Financial Assets ◽  
Profit Shifting ◽  
Tax Havens ◽  
Financial Flows ◽  
Illicit Flows ◽  
Illicit Financial Flows ◽  
Domestic Resource

Illicit financial flows (IFFs) constitute a major challenge for development in the Global South, as domestic resource mobilization is imperative for providing crucial public services. While several methods offer to measure the extent of IFFs, each has its benefits and drawbacks. Critically, methods based on the balance of payments identity may capture licit as well as illicit flows, and a method based on macroeconomic trade discrepancies suffers from doubtful assumptions. The most convincing estimate to date demonstrates that individuals hold financial assets worth around ten per cent of global GDP in tax havens. Evidence further indicates that countries in the Global South are more exposed to individuals and multinational enterprises illicitly transferring money out of the country. Further research is warranted on profit shifting out of countries in the Global South and the effectiveness of anti-IFF policies in countries outside Europe and the United States.

scholarly journals Tax Avoidance — Methodology for Quantification and the Case of the Netherlands

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Marco Kerste ◽  
Barbara E. Baarsma ◽  
Jarst Weda
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Tax Havens ◽  
Financial Flows ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Withholding Tax ◽  
Tax Systems ◽  
International Tax ◽  
Expected Benefits

The goal of this paper is to define and quantitatively measure tax avoidance. So far any rigorous assessment of financial flows related to tax avoidance that entails paying (almost) no taxes, is lacking. This prevents a proper assessment of the necessity for further regulation to fight such undesirable tax avoidance. Quantifying tax avoidance provides a sound starting point for assessing the severity of regulation – matching the expected benefits with costs – and sheds further light on the possible design of effective regulation. The paper defines tax avoidance as the legal use of tax constructions aimed at paying (almost) no taxes in the entire international financial chain. Our paper shows that in order to prevent international tax systems from being used for such double non-taxation, governments could introduce a withholding tax on outgoing interest and royalty flows to low tax jurisdictions (tax havens). If the low tax threshold is set at 15% or 10% respectively, then depending on the choice for one of the two provided definitions of ‘low tax jurisdiction’, we find that the combined outgoing royalty and interest flow related to tax avoidance via Dutch conduit companies was on average 9.7 or 11.9 billion euro per year in the period 2009-2013.

scholarly journals International Corporate Tax Avoidance

2020 ◽  
pp. 81-128
Author(s):  
Alex Cobham ◽  
Petr Janský
Keyword(s):  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Multinational Companies ◽  
Critical Survey ◽  
Lower Income ◽  
Corporate Tax ◽  
Profit Shifting ◽  
Methodological Innovation ◽  
Financial Flows ◽  
Illicit Financial Flows ◽  
Lower Income Countries

exy2Tax avoidance by multinational companies is the most widely recognised tax abuse, and also the most heavily researched aspect of illicit financial flows (IFF). This chapter provides a critical survey of the leading estimates, highlighting the range of methodological innovation and alternative data. While the global range of estimated revenue losses is wide (between around $200bn and $600bn a year), consistent findings include that it is only a handful of jurisdictions that benefit from profit shifting at the expense of all others; and that lower-income countries lose the highest share of current tax revenues. While there is no single, perfect estimate in the literature, it does point the way to a potential indicator for the UN target.

scholarly journals The International Company and Tax Avoidance

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Viola Tanto
Keyword(s):  
Multinational Corporations ◽  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Debt Crisis ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Tax Havens ◽  
The Arts ◽  
Global Corporations ◽  
Global Player ◽  
Tax Fraud ◽  
The One

In combination with sluggish economic development, the financial crisis and the debt crisis that it triggered have contributed to the fact that tax evasion, tax fraud and tax avoidance are recognized as a serious problem. Tax evasion and tax fraud by well-known personalities from politics, sport, the arts and commerce also attract intensive coverage in the media. In the companies sector, internationalization makes it easier for global corporations to shift their profits to low-tax countries and thus to minimize their tax bill. This paper shall discuss also, the measures to combat international tax evasion to be worked out by the OECD and the G20. The fact that multinational corporations are able to reduce their tax burden on profits through tax-saving plans has been known for decades. There are several reasons for the massive increase in this phenomenon in recent years. On the one hand there has been increasing globalisation, on the other corporate structures have also changed massively in recent decades. Tax havens play an important role in this context and there is practically no global player without branches in tax havens

scholarly journals How Big Are Illicit Financial Flows?

2021 ◽  
pp. 75-88
Author(s):  
Joras Ferwerda ◽  
Brigitte Unger
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Financial Flows ◽  
Illicit Financial Flows ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Tax Regulation

In recent years several leaks have given us insight into how the wealthy and criminals hide their money. The boom of leaks has resulted in a ‘hot phase’ in tax regulation. As a result, the number of studies that want to measure illicit financial flows has also increased. This chapter tries to provide an overview of this booming new field. What do all these studies teach us about the seriousness and size of tax avoidance, tax evasion, and money laundering? What is precisely measured, and how? This chapter concludes that the term ‘Illicit Financial Flows’ has become a bit of a floating identifier, a name that is vague enough to be used for many different concepts but at the cost of losing its meaning. We argue that decomposing the problem of illicit financial flows and what each study aims to measure, might give more useful insights.

Who are our owners? Exploring the ownership links of businesses to identify illicit financial flows

2021 ◽  
pp. 147737082098036
Author(s):  
Alberto Aziani ◽  
Joras Ferwerda ◽  
Michele Riccardi
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Economic Incentives ◽  
Tax Havens ◽  
Financial Flows ◽  
Holding Companies ◽  
Business Ownership ◽  
Cultural Proximity ◽  
Illicit Financial Flows ◽  
High Level

This article investigates the patterns of business ownership in Europe, using a unique dataset on the nationality of 28.7 million shareholders of companies registered in 41 European countries. By means of an exploratory multivariate analysis, it tests whether ownership links between different countries are driven exclusively by social and macroeconomic variables – such as trade or geographical or cultural proximity – or are also related to measures of financial secrecy, corruption and lack of compliance with anti-money laundering regulations. The results indicate that factors other than licit economic incentives explain the international ownership structure of European companies. European firms have an abnormal number (that is, above the predicted value) of owners from tax havens and countries with poor financial transparency, which may suggest the use of holding companies for money laundering and tax evasion and to conceal illicit financial flows. However, ceteris paribus, the number of owners is abnormal in countries where rule of law and the control of corruption are more effective, suggesting that a high level of corruption may be a cost in money laundering activities. The findings contribute to the current international debate on illicit financial flows – as framed by United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 16.4 – and can be used by public agencies and private actors to detect anomalies in business ownership and prevent potential financial crime schemes at corporate level.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document