The Association Between Continuity of Primary Care and Preventive Cancer Screening in Women With Intellectual Disability

2018 ◽  
Vol 123 (6) ◽  
pp. 499-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Plourde ◽  
Hilary K. Brown ◽  
Simone Vigod ◽  
Virginie Cobigo
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Continuity Of Care ◽  
Pap Test ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Breast And Cervical Cancer ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Women with intellectual disability have low screening rates for breast and cervical cancer. This population-based cohort study examined the association between the level of primary care continuity and breast and cervical cancer screening rates in women with intellectual disability. Data were obtained from the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences and the Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services. Neither high (adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.88-1.29) nor moderate (aOR = 1.11; 95% CI: 0.91-1.36) continuity of care were associated with mammography screening. Women were less likely to receive a Pap test with high (aOR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.64-0.77) and moderate (aOR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.89) versus low continuity of care. Improving continuity of care may not be sufficient for increasing preventive screening rates.

Compliance with Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Programs in Women: Results from a Population-Based Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 565-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rossana Berardi ◽  
Dania Nacciarriti ◽  
Tiziana Tamburrano ◽  
Giovanna Carbonari ◽  
Emanuela Romagnoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
Breast And Cervical Cancer

scholarly journals Patterns and Trends of Cancer Screening in Canada: Results From a Contemporary National Survey

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-76
Author(s):  
Omar Abdel-Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
Pap Test ◽  
Complete Information ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Visible Minority ◽  
Crc Screening ◽  
Breast And Cervical Cancer

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the patterns and trends of colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screening within a contemporary cohort of Canadian adults. Methods: Canadian Community Health Survey datasets (2007–2016) were accessed and 3 cohorts were defined: (1) a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening cohort, defined as men and women aged 50 to 74 years with complete information about CRC screening tests and their timing; (2) a breast cancer screening cohort, defined as women aged 40 to 74 years with complete information about mammography and its timing; and (3) a cervical cancer screening cohort, defined as women aged 25 to 69 years with complete information about the Papanicolaou (Pap) test and its timing. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was then performed to evaluate factors associated with not having timely screening tests at the time of survey completion. Results: A total of 99,820 participants were considered eligible for the CRC screening cohort, 59,724 for the breast cancer screening cohort, and 46,767 for the cervical cancer screening cohort. Among eligible participants, 43% did not have timely recommended screening tests for CRC, 35% did not have timely mammography (this number decreased to 26% when limiting the eligible group to ages 50–74 years), and 25% did not have a timely Pap test. Lower income was associated with not having a timely recommended screening tests for all 3 cohorts (odds ratios [95% CI]: 1.86 [1.76–1.97], 1.89 [1.76–2.04], and 1.96 [1.79–2.14], respectively). Likewise, persons self-identifying as a visible minority were less likely to have timely recommended screening tests in all 3 cohorts (odds ratios for White race vs visible minority [95% CI]: 0.87 [0.83–0.92], 0.85 [0.80–0.91], and 0.66 [0.61–0.70], respectively). Conclusions: More than one-third of eligible individuals are missing timely screening tests for CRC. Moreover, at least one-quarter of eligible women are missing their recommended breast and cervical cancer screening tests. More efforts from federal and provincial health authorities are needed to deal with socioeconomic disparities in access to cancer screening.

scholarly journals Participative education with nurses: potentialities and vulnerabilities in the breast and cervical cancer tracking

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (suppl 6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidia Santos Soares ◽  
Maria da Anunciação Silva ◽  
Hayda Josiane Alves ◽  
Ana Beatriz Azevedo Queiroz ◽  
Irma da Silva Brito
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Systematic Account ◽  
Pedagogical Strategies ◽  
Education Experience ◽  
Unified Health System ◽  
Breast And Cervical Cancer ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Primary Care Nurses

ABSTRACT Objectives: to systematize permanent participatory education experience with Primary Care nurses on breast and cervical cancer screening, identifying potentialities and vulnerabilities. Methods: systematic account according to Holliday, in five stages: starting point, initial questions, recovery of the lived process, background reflection and arrival points. It was the product of two workshops with 96 nurses and analyzed in the light of the ministerial guidelines and Ayres’ concept of vulnerability. Results: the potentialities are related to the nurse’s work implementing the principles of the Unified Health System. The difficulties are complex and expose individual, contextual and programmatic vulnerabilities in the practice of screening. Final Considerations: permanent education and participatory pedagogical strategies allowed a wide and playful exchange of learning and the participation of a significant number of professionals. There is a need for studies on the institutionality of programmatic guidelines and nurses’ space to be the initiator of new practices within the scope of Primary Care.

scholarly journals Methodologies of Primary HPV Testing Currently Applied for Cervical Cancer Screening

Life ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 290
Author(s):  
Andreas C. Chrysostomou ◽  
Leondios G. Kostrikis
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
Pap Test ◽  
Population Based ◽  
World Health ◽  
Hpv Testing ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
European Guidelines ◽  
Health Organization

The human papillomavirus is one of the most common sexually transmitted viruses, and an infection from this virus may become persistent, leading to diseases such as cervical cancer. In the past, cytology-based methods such as the Papanicolaou (Pap) test were imperative to identify the disease at a stage where it can be treated. However, since the 1980s where the etiological association of HPV and cervical cancer was identified, new tests began emerging directed towards identifying the virus. Furthermore, as the biology of HPV along with the relationships with its host are elucidated, these tests and treatments further advance. Recently in Europe, there is a movement towards the implementation of HPV testing methodologies in national screening programs to precede cytological testing. These screening strategies are recommended by the European guidelines and the World Health Organization. This review presents the current HPV testing methodologies, their application in organized population-based cervical cancer screening programs based on the most recent European guidelines, and their implementation status in countries in Europe.

scholarly journals Measuring colposcopy quality in Canada: development of population-based indicators

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Decker ◽  
N. Baines ◽  
C. Muzyka ◽  
M. Lee ◽  
M. H. Mayrand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Pap Test ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Treatment Rate ◽  
Treatment Frequency ◽  
Screening Programs

Background Colposcopy is a key part of cervical cancer control. As cervical cancer screening and prevention strategies evolve, monitoring colposcopy performance will become even more critical. In the present paper, we describe population-based colposcopy quality indicators that are recommended for ongoing measurement by cervical cancer screening programs in Canada.Methods The Pan-Canadian Cervical Cancer Screening Network established a multidisciplinary expert working group to identify population-based colposcopy quality indicators. A systematic literature review was conducted to ascertain existing population and program-level colposcopy quality indicators. A systems-level cervical cancer screening pathway describing each step from an abnormal screening test, to colposcopy, and back to screening was developed. Indicators from the literature were assigned a place on the pathway to ensure that all steps were measured. A prioritization matrix scoring system was used to score each indicator based on predetermined criteria. Proposed colposcopy quality indicators were shared with provincial and territorial screening programs and subsequently revised.Results The 10 population-based colposcopy quality indicators identified as priorities were colposcopy uptake, histologic investigation (biopsy) rate, colposcopy referral rate, failure to attend colposcopy, treatment frequency in women 18–24 years of age, re-treatment proportion, colposcopy exit-test proportion, histologic investigation (biopsy) frequency after low-grade Pap test results, length of colposcopy episode of care, and operating room treatment rate. Two descriptive indicators were also identified: colposcopist volume and number of colposcopists per capita.Summary High-quality colposcopy services are an essential component of provincial cervical cancer screening programs. The proposed quality and descriptive indicators will permit colposcopy outcomes to be compared between provinces and across Canada so as to identify opportunities for improving colposcopy services.

scholarly journals Determinants of Population-Based Cancer Screening Performance at Primary Healthcare Institutions in China

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 3312
Author(s):  
Senshuang Zheng ◽  
Xiaorui Zhang ◽  
Marcel J. W. Greuter ◽  
Geertruida H. de Bock ◽  
Wenli Lu
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
Primary Healthcare ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Target Number ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Breast And Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screenings

Background: For a decade, most population-based cancer screenings in China are performed by primary healthcare institutions. To assess the determinants of performance of primary healthcare institutions in population-based breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening in China. Methods: A total of 262 primary healthcare institutions in Tianjin participated in a survey on cancer screening. The survey consisted of questions on screening tests, the number of staff members and training, the introduction of the screening programs to residents, the invitation of residents, and the number of performed screenings per year. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the determinants of performance of an institution to fulfil the target number of screenings. Results: In 58% and 61% of the institutions between three and nine staff members were dedicated to breast and cervical cancer screening, respectively, whereas in 71% of the institutions ≥10 staff members were dedicated to colorectal cancer screening. On average 60% of institutions fulfilled the target number of breast and cervical cancer screenings, whereas 93% fulfilled the target number for colorectal cancer screening. The determinants of performance were rural districts for breast (OR = 5.16 (95%CI: 2.51–10.63)) and cervical (OR = 4.17 (95%CI: 2.14–8.11)) cancer screenings, and ≥3 staff members dedicated to cervical cancer screening (OR = 2.34 (95%CI: 1.09–5.01)). Conclusion: Primary healthcare institutions in China perform better in colorectal than in breast and cervical cancer screening, and institutions in rural districts perform better than institutions in urban districts. Increasing the number of staff members on breast and cervical cancer screening could improve the performance of population-based cancer screening.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document