Voice Quality and Speech Intelligibility Among Deaf Children

1983 ◽  
Vol 128 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randall B. Monsen
2012 ◽  
Vol 126 (10) ◽  
pp. 989-994 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Hassanzadeh

AbstractObjective:This retrospective study compared the cochlear implantation outcomes of first- and second-generation deaf children.Methods:The study group consisted of seven deaf, cochlear-implanted children with deaf parents. An equal number of deaf children with normal-hearing parents were selected by matched sampling as a reference group. Participants were matched based on onset and severity of deafness, duration of deafness, age at cochlear implantation, duration of cochlear implantation, gender, and cochlear implant model. We used the Persian Auditory Perception Test for the Hearing Impaired, the Speech Intelligibility Rating scale, and the Sentence Imitation Test, in order to measure participants' speech perception, speech production and language development, respectively.Results:Both groups of children showed auditory and speech development. However, the second-generation deaf children (i.e. deaf children of deaf parents) exceeded the cochlear implantation performance of the deaf children with hearing parents.Conclusion:This study confirms that second-generation deaf children exceed deaf children of hearing parents in terms of cochlear implantation performance. Encouraging deaf children to communicate in sign language from a very early age, before cochlear implantation, appears to improve their ability to learn spoken language after cochlear implantation.


2005 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 505-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chii-Yuan Huang ◽  
Hui-Mei Yang ◽  
Yung-Ji Sher ◽  
Yi-Hui Lin ◽  
Jiunn-Liang Wu

2013 ◽  
Vol 278-280 ◽  
pp. 1124-1128
Author(s):  
Yi Long You ◽  
Fei Zhang ◽  
Bu Lei Zuo ◽  
Feng Xiang You

Although traditional algorithms can led to suppressed voice in the noise, but the distortion of the voice is inevitable. An introduction is made as to the speech signal enhancement with an improved threshold method. Compared MATLAB experimental simulation on simulated platform with traditional enhanced algorithm, this paper aims to verify this method can effectively remove the noise in the signal, enhanced voice quality, improve speech intelligibility, and achieve the effect of the enhanced speech signal.


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 561-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M. Evitts ◽  
Heather Starmer ◽  
Kristine Teets ◽  
Christen Montgomery ◽  
Lauren Calhoun ◽  
...  

Purpose There is currently minimal information on the impact of dysphonia secondary to phonotrauma on listeners. Considering the high incidence of voice disorders with professional voice users, it is important to understand the impact of a dysphonic voice on their audiences. Methods Ninety-one healthy listeners (39 men, 52 women; mean age = 23.62 years) were presented with speech stimuli from 5 healthy speakers and 5 speakers diagnosed with dysphonia secondary to phonotrauma. Dependent variables included processing speed (reaction time [RT] ratio), speech intelligibility, and listener comprehension. Voice quality ratings were also obtained for all speakers by 3 expert listeners. Results Statistical results showed significant differences between RT ratio and number of speech intelligibility errors between healthy and dysphonic voices. There was not a significant difference in listener comprehension errors. Multiple regression analyses showed that voice quality ratings from the Consensus Assessment Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (Kempster, Gerratt, Verdolini Abbott, Barkmeier-Kraemer, & Hillman, 2009) were able to predict RT ratio and speech intelligibility but not listener comprehension. Conclusions Results of the study suggest that although listeners require more time to process and have more intelligibility errors when presented with speech stimuli from speakers with dysphonia secondary to phonotrauma, listener comprehension may not be affected.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-68
Author(s):  
Yasser Albalawi ◽  
Mohamad Nidami ◽  
Fida Almohawas ◽  
Abdulrahman Hagr ◽  
Soha N. Garadat

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
John J. Sidtis ◽  
Diana Van Lancker Sidtis ◽  
Ritesh Ramdhani ◽  
Michele Tagliati

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has become an effective and widely used tool in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD). STN-DBS has varied effects on speech. Clinical speech ratings suggest worsening following STN-DBS, but quantitative intelligibility, perceptual, and acoustic studies have produced mixed and inconsistent results. Improvements in phonation and declines in articulation have frequently been reported during different speech tasks under different stimulation conditions. Questions remain about preferred STN-DBS stimulation settings. Seven right-handed, native speakers of English with PD treated with bilateral STN-DBS were studied off medication at three stimulation conditions: stimulators off, 60 Hz (low frequency stimulation—LFS), and the typical clinical setting of 185 Hz (High frequency—HFS). Spontaneous speech was recorded in each condition and excerpts were prepared for transcription (intelligibility) and difficulty judgements. Separate excerpts were prepared for listeners to rate abnormalities in voice, articulation, fluency, and rate. Intelligibility for spontaneous speech was reduced at both HFS and LFS when compared to STN-DBS off. On the average, speech produced at HFS was more intelligible than that produced at LFS, but HFS made the intelligibility task (transcription) subjectively more difficult. Both voice quality and articulation were judged to be more abnormal with DBS on. STN-DBS reduced the intelligibility of spontaneous speech at both LFS and HFS but lowering the frequency did not improve intelligibility. Voice quality ratings with STN-DBS were correlated with the ratings made without stimulation. This was not true for articulation ratings. STN-DBS exacerbated existing voice problems and may have introduced new articulatory abnormalities. The results from individual DBS subjects showed both improved and reduced intelligibility varied as a function of DBS, with perceived changes in voice appearing to be more reflective of intelligibility than perceived changes in articulation.


2000 ◽  
Vol 109 (12_suppl) ◽  
pp. 123-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario A. Svirsky ◽  
Robert B. Sloan ◽  
Matthew Caldwell ◽  
Richard T. Miyamoto

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document