Sotorasib. GTPase KRAS (G12C mutant) inhibitor, Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, Treatment of colorectal cancer, Treatment of solid tumors

3015 Background: Mirzotamab clezutoclax (ABBV-155) is a first-in-class antibody drug conjugate comprised of a BCL-XL (B-cell lymphoma - extra long) inhibitor, solubilizing linker, and a monoclonal anti-B7H3 antibody. Methods: Patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) solid tumors were administered mirzotamab clezutoclax with or without paclitaxel. Dose escalation of mirzotamab clezutoclax was guided by Bayesian continual reassessment. Primary outcomes were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Secondary outcomes: safety, pharmacokinetics, and overall response rate per RECIST v1.1. Results: As of November 6, 2020, 31 pts received mirzotamab clezutoclax monotherapy (monoTx) and 28 pts received combination therapy with paclitaxel (comboTx). Overall demographics: median age 62 years (range 25–79); 61% female; 86% white; 24% ECOG 0, 76% ECOG 1; 51% had > 3 prior systemic therapies. The median duration of mirzotamab clezutoclax exposure was 3 cycles (range 1–14) for monoTx and 5 cycles (range 1–14) for comboTx. There were no dose limiting toxicities (DLT) reported with monoTx. In comboTx, 2 pts experienced a DLT: Grade 4 neutrophil count decreased and Grade 3 lymphocyte count decreased considered related to paclitaxel. 97% of all pts had adverse events (AEs). The most common AEs (in ≥20% of pts) overall were fatigue (39%), nausea (25%), diarrhea and arthralgia (22% each), vomiting and hypokalemia (20% each). AEs in ≥5 pts related to mirzotamab cleuzutoclax were fatigue (27%), diarrhea (12%), and nausea (9%). Related Grade 3/4 AEs overall (in > 1 patient) included anemia, lymphocyte count decreased, fatigue, and diarrhea (3% each). One patient on monoTx experienced a fatal cardiac arrest. No fatal AEs occurred on comboTx. Responses were observed with comboTx as shown in the Table. Conclusions: Mirzotamab clezutoclax as monotherapy and with paclitaxel demonstrates a tolerable safety profile (MTD not reached) with anti-tumor activity in R/R solid tumors. Further investigation in prospectively-selected B7H3 positive tumors as monoTx in pts with R/R small cell lung cancer and with paclitaxel in pts with R/R breast cancer and docetaxel in pts with R/R non-small cell lung cancer in the dose expansion phase is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03595059. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Immune checkpoint inhibitors: Significant advancements in non–small cell lung cancer treatment

American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy ◽

10.1093/ajhp/zxab041 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Ashley E Glode ◽

Megan B May

Keyword(s):

Lung Cancer ◽

Cancer Treatment ◽

Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽

Cell Lung Cancer ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Small Cell ◽

Novel Therapies ◽

Small Cell Lung

Abstract Purpose This article explores the efficacy, toxicity, place in therapy, and considerations for use of recently approved immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Summary Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States and is responsible for more cancer-related deaths than breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer combined. The landscape for lung cancer treatment is evolving with the approval of new and exciting novel therapies. Within the last decade numerous ICIs have been approved for use in the management of the most common subtype of lung cancer, NSCLC. The ICI agents currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in NSCLC include ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, durvalumab, and atezolizumab. These agents are approved for specific indications; therefore, they are not interchangeable. This review focuses on the landmark trials that led to each FDA-approved indication, as well as common toxicities seen with use of these agents. It also discusses the use of ICIs in special populations and unique considerations prior to initiation of treatment with these novel therapies in a patient with NSCLC. Conclusion ICIs can provide a breakthrough treatment option for the management of NSCLC and are rapidly being adopted into clinical practice. It is important to be familiar with appropriate selection of an ICI therapy option for each patient based on approved indication, unique considerations, and anticipated toxicities.

Download Full-text