Quantum entanglement by a beam splitter analogous to laser mode transformation by a cylindrical lens

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yung-Fu Chen ◽  
M. X. Hsieh ◽  
H. T. Ke ◽  
Y. T. Yu ◽  
Hsing-Chih Liang ◽  
...  
Entropy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Dmitry Makarov ◽  
Yuliana Tsykareva

It is well known that the waveguide beam splitter can be used as a source for the quantum entanglement of photons. The analysis of such quantum entanglement is a difficult problem even for monochromatic photons, since the system under study is multiparametric. This paper will show that quantum entanglement can be represented in a simple form not only for monochromatic photons but also for non-monochromatic ones. It will be shown that quantum entanglement for non-monochromatic photons can be very different from monochromatic photons, which can be used to create large quantum entanglement.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. N. Makarov ◽  
E. S. Gusarevich ◽  
A. A. Goshev ◽  
K. A. Makarova ◽  
S. N. Kapustin ◽  
...  

AbstractIt is well known that a beam splitter (BS) can be used as a source of photon quantum entanglement. This is due to the fact that the statistics of photons changes at the output ports of the BS. Usually, quantum entanglement and photon statistics take into account the constancy of the reflection coefficient R or the transmission coefficient T of the BS, where $$R + T = 1$$ R + T = 1 . It has recently been shown that if BS is used in the form of coupled waveguides, the coefficients R and T will depend on the photon frequencies. In this paper, it is shown that the quantum entanglement and statistics of photons at the output ports of a BS can change significantly if a BS is used in the form of coupled waveguides, where the coefficients R and T are frequency-dependent.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sankar Das Sarma ◽  
Michael Freedman ◽  
Victor Galitski ◽  
Chetan Nayak ◽  
Kirill Shtengel

Author(s):  
Richard Healey

Quantum entanglement is popularly believed to give rise to spooky action at a distance of a kind that Einstein decisively rejected. Indeed, important recent experiments on systems assigned entangled states have been claimed to refute Einstein by exhibiting such spooky action. After reviewing two considerations in favor of this view I argue that quantum theory can be used to explain puzzling correlations correctly predicted by assignment of entangled quantum states with no such instantaneous action at a distance. We owe both considerations in favor of the view to arguments of John Bell. I present simplified forms of these arguments as well as a game that provides insight into the situation. The argument I give in response turns on a prescriptive view of quantum states that differs both from Dirac’s (as stated in Chapter 2) and Einstein’s.


2021 ◽  
Vol 219 ◽  
pp. 106859
Author(s):  
Rujuta Vaze ◽  
Nagraj Deshmukh ◽  
Rajesh Kumar ◽  
Akash Saxena

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document