scholarly journals Division-induced DNA double strand breaks in the chromosome terminus region of Escherichia coli lacking RecBCD DNA repair enzyme

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. e1006895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anurag Kumar Sinha ◽  
Adeline Durand ◽  
Jean-Michel Desfontaines ◽  
Ielyzaveta Iurchenko ◽  
Hélène Auger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Repair Enzyme ◽  
Strand Breaks

scholarly journals RecO impedes RecG-SSB binding to impair the strand annealing recombination pathway in E.coli

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuefeng Pan ◽  
Li Yang ◽  
Nan Jiang ◽  
Xifang Chen ◽  
Bo Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Recombinational Repair ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Recombinational Repair ◽  
Differential Binding

AbstractFaithful duplication of genomic DNA relies not only on the fidelity of DNA replication itself, but also on fully functional DNA repair and homologous recombination machinery. We report a molecular mechanism responsible for deciding homologous recombinational repair pathways during replication dictated by binding of RecO and RecG to SSB in E.coli. Using a RecG-yfp fusion protein, we found that RecG-yfp foci appeared only in the ΔrecG, ΔrecO and ΔrecA, ΔrecO double mutants. Surprisingly, foci were not observed in wild-type ΔrecG, or double mutants where recG and either recF or, separately recR were deleted. In addition, formation of RecG-yfp foci in the ΔrecO::kanR required wildtype ssb, as ssb-113 could not substitute. This suggests that RecG and RecO binding to SSB is competitive. We also found that the UV resistance of recO alone mutant increased to certain extent by supplementing RecG. In an ssb-113 mutant, RecO and RecG worked following a different pattern. Both RecO and RecG were able to participate in repairing UV damages when grown at permissive temperature, while they could also be involved in making DNA double strand breaks when grown at nonpermissive temperature. So, our results suggested that differential binding of RecG and RecO to SSB in a DNA replication fork in Escherichia coli.may be involved in determining whether the SDSA or DSBR pathway of homologous recombinational repair is used.Author summarySingle strand DNA binding proteins (SSB) stabilize DNA holoenzyme and prevent single strand DNA from folding into non-B DNA structures in a DNA replication fork. It has also been revealed that SSB can also act as a platform for some proteins working in DNA repair and recombination to access DNA molecules when DNA replication fork needs to be reestablished. In Escherichia coli, several proteins working primarily in DNA repair and recombination were found to participate in DNA replication fork resumption by physically interacting with SSB, including RecO and RecG etc. However the hierarchy of these proteins interacting with SSB in Escherichia coli has not been well defined. In this study, we demonstrated a differential binding of RecO and RecG to SSB in DNA replication was used to establish a RecO-dependent pathway of replication fork repair by abolishing a RecG-dependent replication fork repair. We also show that, RecG and RecO could randomly participate in DNA replication repair in the absence of a functional SSB, which may be responsible for the generation of DNA double strand breaks in an ssb-113 mutant in Escherichia coli.

scholarly journals End-resection at DNA double-strand breaks in the three domains of life

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 314-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
John K. Blackwood ◽  
Neil J. Rzechorzek ◽  
Sian M. Bray ◽  
Joseph D. Maman ◽  
Luca Pellegrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Domains Of Life ◽  
Strand Invasion ◽  
End Resection

During DNA repair by HR (homologous recombination), the ends of a DNA DSB (double-strand break) must be resected to generate single-stranded tails, which are required for strand invasion and exchange with homologous chromosomes. This 5′–3′ end-resection of the DNA duplex is an essential process, conserved across all three domains of life: the bacteria, eukaryota and archaea. In the present review, we examine the numerous and redundant helicase and nuclease systems that function as the enzymatic analogues for this crucial process in the three major phylogenetic divisions.

scholarly journals Large-scale heterochromatin remodeling linked to overreplication-associated DNA damage

2016 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 406-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Feng ◽  
Christopher J. Hale ◽  
Ryan S. Over ◽  
Shawn J. Cokus ◽  
Steven E. Jacobsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Repair Enzyme ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Histone 3 ◽  
Challenging Environment ◽  
Chromatin Density ◽  
Being Moved

Previously, we have shown that loss of the histone 3 lysine 27 (H3K27) monomethyltransferases ARABIDOPSIS TRITHORAX-RELATED 5 (ATXR5) and ATXR6 (ATXR6) results in the overreplication of heterochromatin. Here we show that the overreplication results in DNA damage and extensive chromocenter remodeling into unique structures we have named “overreplication-associated centers” (RACs). RACs have a highly ordered structure with an outer layer of condensed heterochromatin, an inner layer enriched in the histone variant H2AX, and a low-density core containing foci of phosphorylated H2AX (a marker of double-strand breaks) and the DNA-repair enzyme RAD51. atxr5,6 mutants are strongly affected by mutations in DNA repair, such as ATM and ATR. Because of its dense packaging and repetitive DNA sequence, heterochromatin is a challenging environment in which to repair DNA damage. Previous work in animals has shown that heterochromatic breaks are translocated out of the heterochromatic domain for repair. Our results show that atxr5,6 mutants use a variation on this strategy for repairing heterochromatic DNA damage. Rather than being moved to adjacent euchromatic regions, as in animals, heterochromatin undergoes large-scale remodeling to create a compartment with low chromatin density.

RecF, UvrD, RecX and RecN proteins suppress DNA degradation at DNA double-strand breaks in Escherichia coli

Biochimie ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 148 ◽  
pp. 116-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isidoro Feliciello ◽  
Davor Zahradka ◽  
Ksenija Zahradka ◽  
Siniša Ivanković ◽  
Nikolina Puc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Degradation ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Recn Proteins

scholarly journals Recent advances in the nucleolar responses to DNA double-strand breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (17) ◽  
pp. 9449-9461
Author(s):  
Lea Milling Korsholm ◽  
Zita Gál ◽  
Blanca Nieto ◽  
Oliver Quevedo ◽  
Stavroula Boukoura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Repetitive Sequences ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response

Abstract DNA damage poses a serious threat to human health and cells therefore continuously monitor and repair DNA lesions across the genome. Ribosomal DNA is a genomic domain that represents a particular challenge due to repetitive sequences, high transcriptional activity and its localization in the nucleolus, where the accessibility of DNA repair factors is limited. Recent discoveries have significantly extended our understanding of how cells respond to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the nucleolus, and new kinases and multiple down-stream targets have been identified. Restructuring of the nucleolus can occur as a consequence of DSBs and new data point to an active regulation of this process, challenging previous views. Furthermore, new insights into coordination of cell cycle phases and ribosomal DNA repair argue against existing concepts. In addition, the importance of nucleolar-DNA damage response (n-DDR) mechanisms for maintenance of genome stability and the potential of such factors as anti-cancer targets is becoming apparent. This review will provide a detailed discussion of recent findings and their implications for our understanding of the n-DDR. The n-DDR shares features with the DNA damage response (DDR) elsewhere in the genome but is also emerging as an independent response unique to ribosomal DNA and the nucleolus.

scholarly journals The role of ubiquitin-dependent segregase p97 (VCP or Cdc48) in chromatin dynamics after DNA double strand breaks

2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1731) ◽  
pp. 20160282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignacio Torrecilla ◽  
Judith Oehler ◽  
Kristijan Ramadan
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Chromatin Remodelling ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Chromatin Dynamics ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Signalling Molecules

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are the most cytotoxic DNA lesions and, if not repaired, lead to chromosomal rearrangement, genomic instability and cell death. Cells have evolved a complex network of DNA repair and signalling molecules which promptly detect and repair DSBs, commonly known as the DNA damage response (DDR). The DDR is orchestrated by various post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, methylation, ubiquitination or SUMOylation. As DSBs are located in complex chromatin structures, the repair of DSBs is engineered at two levels: (i) at sites of broken DNA and (ii) at chromatin structures that surround DNA lesions. Thus, DNA repair and chromatin remodelling machineries must work together to efficiently repair DSBs. Here, we summarize the current knowledge of the ubiquitin-dependent molecular unfoldase/segregase p97 (VCP in vertebrates and Cdc48 in worms and lower eukaryotes) in DSB repair. We identify p97 as an essential factor that regulates DSB repair. p97-dependent extraction of ubiquitinated substrates mediates spatio-temporal protein turnover at and around the sites of DSBs, thus orchestrating chromatin remodelling and DSB repair. As p97 is a druggable target, p97 inhibition in the context of DDR has great potential for cancer therapy, as shown for other DDR components such as PARP, ATR and CHK1. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Chromatin modifiers and remodellers in DNA repair and signalling’.

PARP-1 regulation of DNA repair factor availability.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 269-269
Author(s):  
Matthew Joseph Schiewer ◽  
Amy C Mandigo ◽  
Nicolas Gordon ◽  
Christopher McNair ◽  
Costas D. Lallas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Transcriptional Profiling ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Mechanistic Investigation ◽  
Androgen Receptor Activity ◽  
Repair Factor ◽  
Parp 1

269 Background: PARP-1 holds major functions on chromatin, DNA damage repair and transcriptional regulation, both of which are relevant in the context of cancer. Previously, it was determined that PARP-1 ins involved in regulation of androgen receptor activity. Methods: Here, unbiased transcriptional profiling revealed the downstream transcriptional profile of PARP-1 enzymatic activity.Results: Further investigation of the PARP-1-regulated transcriptome and secondary strategies for assessing PARP-1 activity in patient tissues revealed that PARP-1 activity was unexpectedly enriched as a function of disease progression and was associated with poor outcome independent of DNA double-strand breaks, suggesting that enhanced PARP-1 activity may promote aggressive phenotypes. Mechanistic investigation revealed that active PARP-1 served to enhance E2F1 transcription factor activity, and specifically promoted E2F1-mediated induction of DNA repair factors involved in homologous recombination (HR). Conversely, PARP-1 inhibition reduced HR factor availability and thus acted to induce or enhance “BRCA-ness”. Conclusions: These observations bring new understanding of PARP-1 function in cancer and have significant ramifications on predicting PARP-1 inhibitor function in the clinical setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document