scholarly journals The role of ubiquitin-dependent segregase p97 (VCP or Cdc48) in chromatin dynamics after DNA double strand breaks

2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1731) ◽  
pp. 20160282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignacio Torrecilla ◽  
Judith Oehler ◽  
Kristijan Ramadan
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Chromatin Remodelling ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Chromatin Dynamics ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Signalling Molecules

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are the most cytotoxic DNA lesions and, if not repaired, lead to chromosomal rearrangement, genomic instability and cell death. Cells have evolved a complex network of DNA repair and signalling molecules which promptly detect and repair DSBs, commonly known as the DNA damage response (DDR). The DDR is orchestrated by various post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, methylation, ubiquitination or SUMOylation. As DSBs are located in complex chromatin structures, the repair of DSBs is engineered at two levels: (i) at sites of broken DNA and (ii) at chromatin structures that surround DNA lesions. Thus, DNA repair and chromatin remodelling machineries must work together to efficiently repair DSBs. Here, we summarize the current knowledge of the ubiquitin-dependent molecular unfoldase/segregase p97 (VCP in vertebrates and Cdc48 in worms and lower eukaryotes) in DSB repair. We identify p97 as an essential factor that regulates DSB repair. p97-dependent extraction of ubiquitinated substrates mediates spatio-temporal protein turnover at and around the sites of DSBs, thus orchestrating chromatin remodelling and DSB repair. As p97 is a druggable target, p97 inhibition in the context of DDR has great potential for cancer therapy, as shown for other DDR components such as PARP, ATR and CHK1. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Chromatin modifiers and remodellers in DNA repair and signalling’.

scholarly journals Recent advances in the nucleolar responses to DNA double-strand breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (17) ◽  
pp. 9449-9461
Author(s):  
Lea Milling Korsholm ◽  
Zita Gál ◽  
Blanca Nieto ◽  
Oliver Quevedo ◽  
Stavroula Boukoura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Repetitive Sequences ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response

Abstract DNA damage poses a serious threat to human health and cells therefore continuously monitor and repair DNA lesions across the genome. Ribosomal DNA is a genomic domain that represents a particular challenge due to repetitive sequences, high transcriptional activity and its localization in the nucleolus, where the accessibility of DNA repair factors is limited. Recent discoveries have significantly extended our understanding of how cells respond to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the nucleolus, and new kinases and multiple down-stream targets have been identified. Restructuring of the nucleolus can occur as a consequence of DSBs and new data point to an active regulation of this process, challenging previous views. Furthermore, new insights into coordination of cell cycle phases and ribosomal DNA repair argue against existing concepts. In addition, the importance of nucleolar-DNA damage response (n-DDR) mechanisms for maintenance of genome stability and the potential of such factors as anti-cancer targets is becoming apparent. This review will provide a detailed discussion of recent findings and their implications for our understanding of the n-DDR. The n-DDR shares features with the DNA damage response (DDR) elsewhere in the genome but is also emerging as an independent response unique to ribosomal DNA and the nucleolus.

scholarly journals The Determinant of DNA Repair Pathway Choices in Ionising Radiation-Induced DNA Double-Strand Breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Zhao ◽  
Chengyu Bao ◽  
Yuxuan Shang ◽  
Xinye He ◽  
Chiyuan Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Ionising Radiation ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Dsbs ◽  
Repair Pathways

Ionising radiation- (IR-) induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are considered to be the deleterious DNA lesions that pose a serious threat to genomic stability. The major DNA repair pathways, including classical nonhomologous end joining, homologous recombination, single-strand annealing, and alternative end joining, play critical roles in countering and eliciting IR-induced DSBs to ensure genome integrity. If the IR-induced DNA DSBs are not repaired correctly, the residual or incorrectly repaired DSBs can result in genomic instability that is associated with certain human diseases. Although many efforts have been made in investigating the major mechanisms of IR-induced DNA DSB repair, it is still unclear what determines the choices of IR-induced DNA DSB repair pathways. In this review, we discuss how the mechanisms of IR-induced DSB repair pathway choices can operate in irradiated cells. We first briefly describe the main mechanisms of the major DNA DSB repair pathways and the related key repair proteins. Based on our understanding of the characteristics of IR-induced DNA DSBs and the regulatory mechanisms of DSB repair pathways in irradiated cells and recent advances in this field, We then highlight the main factors and associated challenges to determine the IR-induced DSB repair pathway choices. We conclude that the type and distribution of IR-induced DSBs, chromatin state, DNA-end structure, and DNA-end resection are the main determinants of the choice of the IR-induced DNA DSB repair pathway.

DNA repair after oncological therapy (radiotherapy and chemotherapy)

2016 ◽  
pp. 82-85
Author(s):  
Ekkehard Dikomey ◽  
Kerstin Borgmann ◽  
Malte Kriegs ◽  
Wael Y. Mansour ◽  
Cordula Petersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Genomic Stability ◽  
Lethal Effect ◽  
Tumour Cells ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Radiation Response ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Repair Mechanisms

The lethal effect of ionizing irradiation on tumour cells is mostly determined by the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Cells are able to repair most of the DSBs, but 1% to 3 % are either non- or mis-repaired, which will then give rise to lethal chromosomal aberrations. Cells have evolved complex DSB repair mechanisms with a stringent hierarchy to guarantee the genomic stability. However, in tumour cells both mechanisms as well as hierarchy are often disturbed. This knowledge is important for an understanding of the radiation response of tumours, but—most of all—for the establishment of new and specific targets for therapy.

scholarly journals Screen identifies DYRK1B network as mediator of transcription repression on damaged chromatin

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (29) ◽  
pp. 17019-17030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Dong ◽  
Kirk L. West ◽  
Xin Yi Tan ◽  
Junshi Li ◽  
Toyotaka Ishibashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Gene Silencing ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Active Chromatin ◽  
Chemical Library ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) trigger transient pausing of nearby transcription, an emerging ATM-dependent response that suppresses chromosomal instability. We screened a chemical library designed to target the human kinome for new activities that mediate gene silencing on DSB-flanking chromatin, and have uncovered the DYRK1B kinase as an early respondent to DNA damage. We showed that DYRK1B is swiftly and transiently recruited to laser-microirradiated sites, and that genetic inactivation of DYRK1B or its kinase activity attenuated DSB-induced gene silencing and led to compromised DNA repair. Notably, global transcription shutdown alleviated DNA repair defects associated with DYRK1B loss, suggesting that DYRK1B is strictly required for DSB repair on active chromatin. We also found that DYRK1B mediates transcription silencing in part via phosphorylating and enforcing DSB accumulation of the histone methyltransferase EHMT2. Together, our findings unveil the DYRK1B signaling network as a key branch of mammalian DNA damage response circuitries, and establish the DYRK1B–EHMT2 axis as an effector that coordinates DSB repair on transcribed chromatin.

scholarly journals DNA repair goes hip-hop: SMARCA and CHD chromatin remodellers join the break dance

2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1731) ◽  
pp. 20160285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena B. Rother ◽  
Haico van Attikum
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Posttranslational Modifications ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Hip Hop ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks

Proper signalling and repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) is critical to prevent genome instability and diseases such as cancer. The packaging of DNA into chromatin, however, has evolved as a mere obstacle to these DSB responses. Posttranslational modifications and ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling help to overcome this barrier by modulating nucleosome structures and allow signalling and repair machineries access to DSBs in chromatin. Here we recap our current knowledge on how ATP-dependent SMARCA- and CHD-type chromatin remodellers alter chromatin structure during the signalling and repair of DSBs and discuss how their dysfunction impacts genome stability and human disease. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Chromatin modifiers and remodellers in DNA repair and signalling’.

scholarly journals COMMD1, from the Repair of DNA Double Strand Breaks, to a Novel Anti-Cancer Therapeutic Target

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 830 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amila Suraweera ◽  
Pascal H. G. Duijf ◽  
Christian Jekimovs ◽  
Karsten Schrobback ◽  
Cheng Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Therapeutic Target ◽  
Bioinformatic Analysis ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Reporter Assays

Lung cancer has the highest incidence and mortality among all cancers, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for 85–90% of all lung cancers. Here we investigated the function of COMMD1 in the repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and as a prognostic and therapeutic target in NSCLC. COMMD1 function in DSB repair was investigated using reporter assays in COMMD1-siRNA-depleted cells. The role of COMMD1 in NSCLC was investigated using bioinformatic analysis, qRT-PCR and immunoblotting of control and NSCLC cells, tissue microarrays, cell viability and cell cycle experiments. DNA repair assays demonstrated that COMMD1 is required for the efficient repair of DSBs and reporter assays showed that COMMD1 functions in both non-homologous-end-joining and homologous recombination. Bioinformatic analysis showed that COMMD1 is upregulated in NSCLC, with high levels of COMMD1 associated with poor patient prognosis. COMMD1 mRNA and protein were upregulated across a panel of NSCLC cell lines and siRNA-mediated depletion of COMMD1 decreased cell proliferation and reduced cell viability of NSCLC, with enhanced death after exposure to DNA damaging-agents. Bioinformatic analyses demonstrated that COMMD1 levels positively correlate with the gene ontology DNA repair gene set enrichment signature in NSCLC. Taken together, COMMD1 functions in DSB repair, is a prognostic maker in NSCLC and is potentially a novel anti-cancer therapeutic target for NSCLC.

scholarly journals Reading chromatin signatures after DNA double-strand breaks

2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1731) ◽  
pp. 20160280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus D. Wilson ◽  
Daniel Durocher
Keyword(s):  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Cellular Viability ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Post Translational Modifications ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Landing Platform ◽  
Biochemical Studies

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are DNA lesions that must be accurately repaired in order to preserve genomic integrity and cellular viability. The response to DSBs reshapes the local chromatin environment and is largely orchestrated by the deposition, removal and detection of a complex set of chromatin-associated post-translational modifications. In particular, the nucleosome acts as a central signalling hub and landing platform in this process by organizing the recruitment of repair and signalling factors, while at the same time coordinating repair with other DNA-based cellular processes. While current research has provided a descriptive overview of which histone marks affect DSB repair, we are only beginning to understand how these marks are interpreted to foster an efficient DSB response. Here we review how the modified chromatin surrounding DSBs is read, with a focus on the insights gleaned from structural and biochemical studies. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Chromatin modifiers and remodellers in DNA repair and signalling’.

DNA repair after oncological therapy (radiotherapy and chemotherapy)

2016 ◽  
pp. 82-85
Author(s):  
Ekkehard Dikomey ◽  
Kerstin Borgmann ◽  
Malte Kriegs ◽  
Wael Y. Mansour ◽  
Cordula Petersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Genomic Stability ◽  
Lethal Effect ◽  
Tumour Cells ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Radiation Response ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Repair Mechanisms

The lethal effect of ionizing irradiation on tumour cells is mostly determined by the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Cells are able to repair most of the DSBs, but 1% to 3 % are either non- or mis-repaired, which will then give rise to lethal chromosomal aberrations. Cells have evolved complex DSB repair mechanisms with a stringent hierarchy to guarantee the genomic stability. However, in tumour cells both mechanisms as well as hierarchy are often disturbed. This knowledge is important for an understanding of the radiation response of tumours, but—most of all—for the establishment of new and specific targets for therapy.

scholarly journals DNA Double-Strand Break Repair: All Roads Lead to HeterochROMAtin Marks

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Caron ◽  
Enrico Pobega ◽  
Sophie E. Polo
Keyword(s):  
De Novo ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
The Impact

In response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), chromatin modifications orchestrate DNA repair pathways thus safeguarding genome integrity. Recent studies have uncovered a key role for heterochromatin marks and associated factors in shaping DSB repair within the nucleus. In this review, we present our current knowledge of the interplay between heterochromatin marks and DSB repair. We discuss the impact of heterochromatin features, either pre-existing in heterochromatin domains or de novo established in euchromatin, on DSB repair pathway choice. We emphasize how heterochromatin decompaction and mobility further support DSB repair, focusing on recent mechanistic insights into these processes. Finally, we speculate about potential molecular players involved in the maintenance or the erasure of heterochromatin marks following DSB repair, and their implications for restoring epigenome function and integrity.

scholarly journals The CIP2A-TOPBP1 complex safeguards chromosomal stability during mitosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mara De Marco Zompit ◽  
Clémence Mooser ◽  
Salomé Adam ◽  
Silvia Emma Rossi ◽  
Alain Jeanrenaud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Adaptor Protein ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Genome Maintenance ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Interacting Protein ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Nuclear Envelope Breakdown

The accurate repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), highly toxic DNA lesions, is crucial for genome integrity and is tightly regulated during the cell cycle. In mitosis, cells inactivate DSB repair in favor of a tethering mechanism that stabilizes broken chromosomes until they are repaired in the subsequent cell cycle phases. How this is achieved mechanistically is not yet understood, but the adaptor protein TOPBP1 is critically implicated in this process. Here, we identify CIP2A as a TOPBP1-interacting protein that regulates TOPBP1 localization specifically in mitosis. Cells lacking CIP2A display increased micronuclei formation, DSB repair defects and chromosomal instability. CIP2A is actively exported from the cell nucleus in interphase but, upon nuclear envelope breakdown at the onset of mitosis, gains access to chromatin where it forms a complex with MDC1 and TOPBP1 to promote TOPBP1 recruitment to sites of mitotic DSBs. Collectively, our data uncover CIP2A-TOPBP1 as a mitosis-specific genome maintenance complex.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document