scholarly journals Evidence for Centromere Drive in the Holocentric Chromosomes of Caenorhabditis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e30496 ◽  
Author(s):  
František Zedek ◽  
Petr Bureš
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Krátká ◽  
Jakub Šmerda ◽  
Kateřina Lojdová ◽  
Petr Bureš ◽  
František Zedek

Centromere drive model describes an evolutionary process initiated by centromeric repeats expansion, which leads to the recruitment of excess kinetochore proteins and consequent preferential segregation of an expanded centromere to the egg during female asymmetric meiosis. In response to these selfish centromeres, the histone protein CenH3, which recruits kinetochore components, adaptively evolves to restore chromosomal parity and counter the detrimental effects of centromere drive. Holocentric chromosomes, whose kinetochores are assembled along entire chromosomes, have been hypothesized to prevent expanded centromeres from acquiring a selective advantage and initiating centromere drive. In such a case, CenH3 would be subjected to less frequent or no adaptive evolution. Using codon substitution models, we analyzed 36 CenH3 sequences from 35 species of the holocentric family Cyperaceae. We found 10 positively selected codons in the CenH3 gene [six codons in the N-terminus and four in the histone fold domain (HFD)] and six branches of its phylogeny along which the positive selection occurred. One of the positively selected codons was found in the centromere targeting domain (CATD) that directly interacts with DNA and its mutations may be important in centromere drive suppression. The frequency of these positive selection events was comparable to the frequency of positive selection in monocentric clades with asymmetric female meiosis. Taken together, these results suggest that preventing centromere drive is not the primary adaptive role of holocentric chromosomes, and their ability to suppress it likely depends on their kinetochore structure in meiosis.


2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 559-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Nokkala ◽  
V. G. Kuznetsova ◽  
A. Maryanska-Nadachowska ◽  
C. Nokkala

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela Cabral ◽  
André Marques ◽  
Veit Schubert ◽  
Andrea Pedrosa-Harand ◽  
Peter Schlögelhofer

2009 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela CRINITI ◽  
Gabriele SIMONAZZI ◽  
Stefano CASSANELLI ◽  
Mario FERRARI ◽  
Davide BIZZARO ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 2583-2592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Landon L. Moore ◽  
Gerald Stanvitch ◽  
Mark B. Roth ◽  
David Rosen

ABSTRACT Prior to microtubule capture, sister centromeres resolve from one another, coming to rest on opposite surfaces of the condensing chromosome. Subsequent assembly of sister kinetochores at each sister centromere generates a geometry favorable for equal levels of segregation of chromatids. The holocentric chromosomes of Caenorhabditis elegans are uniquely suited for the study of centromere resolution and subsequent kinetochore assembly. In C. elegans, only two proteins have been identified as being necessary for centromere resolution, the kinase AIR-2 (prophase only) and the centromere protein HCP-4/CENP-C. Here we found that the loss of proteins involved in chromosome cohesion bypassed the requirement for HCP-4/CENP-C but not for AIR-2. Interestingly, the loss of cohesin proteins also restored the localization of HCP-6 to the kinetochore. The loss of the condensin II protein HCP-6 or MIX-1/SMC2 impaired centromere resolution. Furthermore, the loss of HCP-6 or MIX-1/SMC2 resulted in no centromere resolution when either nocodazole or RNA interference (RNAi) of the kinetochore protein KNL-1 perturbed spindle-kinetochore interactions. This result suggests that normal prophase centromere resolution is mediated by condensin II proteins, which are actively recruited to sister centromeres to mediate the process of resolution.


2020 ◽  
Vol 126 (5) ◽  
pp. 883-889 ◽  
Author(s):  
František Zedek ◽  
Klára Plačková ◽  
Pavel Veselý ◽  
Jakub Šmerda ◽  
Petr Šmarda ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Ultraviolet-B radiation (UV-B) radiation damages the DNA, cells and photosynthetic apparatus of plants. Plants commonly prevent this damage by synthetizing UV-B-protective compounds. Recent laboratory experiments in Arabidopsis and cucumber have indicated that plants can also respond to UV-B stress with endopolyploidy. Here we test the generality of this response in natural plant populations, considering their monocentric or holocentric chromosomal structure. Methods We measured the endopolyploidy index (flow cytometry) and the concentration of UV-B-protective compounds in leaves of 12 herbaceous species (1007 individuals) from forest interiors and neighbouring clearings where they were exposed to increased UV-B radiation (103 forest + clearing populations). We then analysed the data using phylogenetic mixed models. Key Results The concentration of UV-B protectives increased with UV-B doses estimated from hemispheric photographs of the sky above sample collection sites, but the increase was more rapid in species with monocentric chromosomes. Endopolyploidy index increased with UV-B doses and with concentrations of UV-B-absorbing compounds only in species with monocentric chromosomes, while holocentric species responded negligibly. Conclusions Endopolyploidy seems to be a common response to increased UV-B in monocentric plants. Low sensitivity to UV-B in holocentric species might relate to their success in high-UV-stressed habitats and corroborates the hypothesized role of holocentric chromosomes in plant terrestrialization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document