scholarly journals A Hybrid Analytical/Numerical Model for the Characterization of Preferential Flow Path with Non-Darcy Flow

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e83536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sen Wang ◽  
Qihong Feng ◽  
Xiaodong Han
Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (18) ◽  
pp. 3559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia ◽  
Tsau ◽  
Barati ◽  
Zhang

There exits a great challenge to evaluate the flow properties of tight porous media even at the core scale. A pulse-decay experiment is routinely used to measure the petrophysical properties of tight cores including permeability and porosity. In this study, 5 sets of pulse-decay experiments are performed on a tight heterogeneous core by flowing nitrogen in the forward and backward directions under different pressures under pore pressures approximately from 100 psi to 300 psi. Permeability values from history matching are from about 300 nD to 600 nD which shows a good linear relationship with the inverse of pore pressure. A preferential flow path is found even when the microcrack is absent. The preferential path causes different porosity values using differential initial upstream and downstream pressure. In addition, the porosity values calculated based on the forward and backward flow directions are also different, and the values are about 1.0% and 2.3%, respectively, which is the primary novelty of this study. The core heterogeneity effect significantly affects the very early stage of pressure responses in both the upstream and downstream but the permeability values are very close in the late-stage experiment. We proposed that that there are two reasons for the preferential flow path: the Joule–Thomson effect for non-ideal gas and the core heterogeneity effect. Based on the finding of this study, we suggest that very early pressure response in a pulse-decay experiment should be closely examined to identify the preferential flow path, and failure to identify the preferential flow path leads to significant porosity and permeability underestimation.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek M Heeren ◽  
Ron B Miller ◽  
Garey A Fox ◽  
Daniel E Storm ◽  
Chad J Penn ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 66 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 161-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Kamolpornwijit ◽  
L Liang ◽  
O.R West ◽  
G.R Moline ◽  
A.B Sullivan

Author(s):  
Tim Klose ◽  
M. Carme Chaparro ◽  
Frank Schilling ◽  
Christoph Butscher ◽  
Steffen Klumbach ◽  
...  

AbstractBorehole leakage is a common and complex issue. Understanding the fluid flow characteristics of a cemented area inside a borehole is crucial to monitor and quantify the wellbore integrity as well as to find solutions to minimise existing leakages. In order to improve our understanding of the flow behaviour of cemented boreholes, we investigated experimental data of a large-scale borehole leakage tests by means of numerical modelling using three different conceptual models. The experiment was performed with an autoclave system consisting of two vessels bridged by a cement-filled casing. After a partial bleed-off at the well-head, a sustained casing pressure was observed due to fluid flow through the cement–steel composite. The aim of our simulations is to investigate and quantify the permeability of the cement–steel composite. From our model results, we conclude that the flow occurred along a preferential flow path at the cement–steel interface. Thus, the inner part of the cement core was impermeable during the duration of the experiment. The preferential flow path can be described as a highly permeable and highly porous area with an aperture of about $$5\,\upmu \mathrm{m}$$ 5 μ m and a permeability of $$3 \cdot 10^{-12}\,\mathrm{m}^{2}$$ 3 · 10 - 12 m 2 (3 Darcy). It follows that the fluid flow characteristics of a cemented area inside a borehole cannot be described using one permeability value for the entire cement–steel composite. Furthermore, it can be concluded that the quality of the cement and the filling process regarding the cement–steel interface is crucial to minimize possible well leakages.


Soil Science ◽  
2011 ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinhua Cheng ◽  
Hongjiang Zhang ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Youyan Zhang ◽  
Yinzhen Chen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document