scholarly journals Validity and reliability of two alternate versions of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Hong Kong version) for screening of Mild Neurocognitive Disorder

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. e0196344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Wong ◽  
Stanley Yiu ◽  
Ziad Nasreddine ◽  
Kam-tat Leung ◽  
Alexander Lau ◽  
...  
Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 317-320
Author(s):  
Ragnhild Munthe-Kaas ◽  
Stina Aam ◽  
Ingvild Saltvedt ◽  
Torgeir Bruun Wyller ◽  
Sarah T. Pendlebury ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: We determined the diagnostic accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for poststroke neurocognitive disorder defined according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria in a prospective observational study. Methods: Consecutive participants able to complete a cognitive test battery and MoCA 3 months poststroke were included. The reference standard of neurocognitive disorder was defined as a score of ≥1.5 SD below the normative mean in ≥1 cognitive domain on the cognitive test battery. Results: Among 521 participants (43.6% women; mean age/SD, 71.5/12.0 years; mean education/SD, 12.4/3.8 years), the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of MoCA for neurocognitive disorder was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76–0.84). Using the standard MoCA cutoff <26, sensitivity was 0.71 (0.69–0.79) with specificity of 0.73 (0.66–0.76). MoCA cutoff of <27 gave higher sensitivity (0.82 [0.77–0.85]) at the expense of specificity (0.60 [0.53–0.66]). Discussion: MoCA has reasonable accuracy for poststroke neurocognitive disorder diagnosed using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02650531.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Wong ◽  
Yun Y. Xiong ◽  
Pauline W. L. Kwan ◽  
Anne Y. Y. Chan ◽  
Wynnie W. M. Lam ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Björn Andersson ◽  
Hao Luo ◽  
Gloria H. Y. Wong ◽  
Terry Y. S. Lum

Background: Bridging scores generated from different cognitive assessment tools is necessary to efficiently track changes in cognition across the continuum of care. This study linked scores from the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-5 min (MoCA 5-min) to the interRAI cognitive Performance Scale (CPS), commonly adopted tools in clinical and long-term care settings, respectively.Methods: We included individual-level data from persons who participated in a home- and community-based care program for older people with mild impairment in Hong Kong. The program used the interRAI-Check Up instrument for needs assessment and service matching between 2017 and 2020. Each participant's cognitive performance was assessed using CPS, CPS Version 2 (CPS2), and MoCA 5-min. We performed equipercentile linking with bivariate log-linear smoothing to establish equivalent scores between the two scales.Results: 3,543 participants had valid data on both scales; 66% were female and their average age was 78.9 years (SD = 8.2). The mean scores for MoCA 5-min, CPS, and CPS2 were 18.5 (SD = 5.9), 0.7 (SD = 0.7), and 1.3 (SD = 1.1), respectively. A CPS or CPS2 score of 0 (intact cognition) corresponds to MoCA 5-min scores of 24 and 25, respectively. At the higher end, a CPS score of 3 (moderately impaired) and a CPS2 score of 5 (moderately impaired Level-2) corresponded to MoCA 5-min scores of 0 and 1, respectively. The linking functions revealed the floor and ceiling effects that exist for the different scales, with CPS and CPS2 measuring more-severe cognitive impairment while the MoCA 5-min was better suited to measure mild impairment.Conclusions: We provided score conversions between MoCA 5-min and CPS/CPS2 within a large cohort of Hong Kong older adults with mild physical or cognitive impairment. This enabled continuity in repeated assessment with different tools and improved comparability of cognitive scores generated from different tools from diverse populations and research cohorts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document