Stroke Rehabilitation

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard I. Lindley

AbstractThe need for stroke rehabilitation will lessen if stroke incidence declines and acute stroke medical and surgical treatment improves. The burden of stroke will also lessen as effective rehabilitation services (stroke rehabilitation units) and interventions are widely implemented. Despite the considerable amount of evidence available, implementation has been slow. Improvement in stroke rehabilitation will require continued professional advocacy, supported by local and national audit and future focused research.

2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-223
Author(s):  
Yoko NAKAMOTO ◽  
Hideo SHITAMA ◽  
Shinya IIDA ◽  
Yoko SUZUKI ◽  
Yasuyuki MATSUSHIMA ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen N Penland ◽  
Cheryl D Bushnell ◽  
Amy M Pastva ◽  
Matthew A Psioda ◽  
Samantha M Levy ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael W Wheaton ◽  
Lewis B Morgenstern ◽  
Melinda Cox ◽  
Jonggyu Baek ◽  
Brisa N Sanchez ◽  
...  

Introduction: Mexican Americans (MAs) have higher stroke incidence compared with non-Hispanic whites (NHWs). Differential use of rehabilitation services could impact stroke outcome. This study was performed to compare the utilization of rehabilitation between MA and NHW in the acute stroke hospital setting. Hypothesis: MAs have less access to rehabilitation services during acute stroke hospitalization. Methods: Data were obtained from the BASIC (Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi) Project, a population-based study in Texas. All first strokes identified between July 2009 and June 2011 in patients over the age of 44 were included. Rehabilitation services were abstracted from medical records using the Joint Commission’s definitions. Primary outcome measures were whether the patient was 1) assessed , 2) recommended , and 3) received rehabilitation during the acute hospital stay. Receipt of physical therapy (PT), occupational therapy (OT) and speech pathology (SP) were also specified. Rehabilitation services were compared by ethnicity using Fisher’s Exact tests and/or random effects logistic regression to account for hospital specific effects. Results: 390 validated strokes met inclusion criteria, 63% were MA. There were no ethnic differences in the rehabilitation services (Table 1). Among those who received rehabilitation services, MAs were more likely to receive OT than NHWs in unadjusted analysis (1.87 [C.I. 1.18-2.94]); however, this association was not apparent after accounting for the hospital in which care was received. Conclusions: Encouragingly, availability and receipt of inpatient rehabilitation services after stroke in this community is high and no ethnic differences in access are present. While rehabilitation services during acute stroke hospitalization does not appear to explain ethnic differences in stroke outcome, future work should examine post-discharge rehabilitation services.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Reham AbdElhamed AbdElmawla Elsaid ◽  
Amina Mohamed AbdElfatah Sliman

Objective: Stroke is considered the main health problem and the second leading cause of death worldwide. Stroke resulting in varied and unpredictable complications if not managed correctly in the acute stage with intensive rehabilitation therapy which may affect stroke prognosis, and resulting functional decline. Therefore, the aim of the study was to explore the consequences of rehabilitation versus conventional care on physiological parameters during the acute stroke recovery period.Methods: The quasi-experimental research design was used in the neurology department at Mansoura University Hospital. A convenient sample of sixty-four adult patients of both sex with stroke, who corresponded to inclusion criteria was assigned into two equal groups, study group (rehabilitation group) and control group (conventional care).Results: The results indicates, acute phase rehabilitation limit physiological parameters deterioration during acute stroke recovery period comparing to conventional care only.Conclusions: Acute phase stroke rehabilitation has a significant positive impact on physiological parameters.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara Purvis ◽  
Sandy Middleton ◽  
Louise E. Craig ◽  
Monique F. Kilkenny ◽  
Simeon Dale ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 333-333
Author(s):  
Pamela W Duncan ◽  
Ronnie D Horner ◽  
Dean M Reker ◽  
VA Medical Ctr ◽  
Kansas City ◽  
...  

97 Purpose & Methods: To assess if compliance with post-stroke rehabilitation guidelines improves functional recovery. The design of the study was an inception cohort of stroke patients followed prospectively for 6 months. The setting was eleven Department of Veteran Affairs Medical Centers providing care to stroke patients. The subjects included 288 selected patients with stroke admitted between January 1998 - March 1999. Data were abstracted from medical records and telephone interviews. Primary outcome was the Functional Independence Motor Score (FIM). Secondary outcomes included Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), SF-36 physical functioning, and the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS). Acute and post-acute rehabilitation composite compliance scores (range 0–100) were derived from an algorithm. All outcomes were adjusted for case mix. Results: Average compliance scores in acute and post acute care settings were 68.2% (+ 14) and 69.5% (+ 14.4), respectively. After case-mix adjustment, level of compliance with post-acute rehabilitation guidelines was significantly associated with FIM motor, IADL, and the SIS physical domain scores. SF-36 physical function scores and mortality were not affected by compliance with post-acute rehabilitation guidelines. Level of compliance with rehabilitation guidelines in acute settings was unrelated to any of the outcome measures. Conclusion: Process of care in post-acute stroke rehabilitation affects 6-month functional recovery. Our findings support the use of guidelines as means of assessing quality of care and improving outcomes. These quality indicators are needed to ensure that quality of care is not comprised with new organizational and funding changes involving post-acute stroke care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document