Laparoscopic Adjustable Banding in Pregnancy: Safety, Patient Tolerance and Effect on Obesity-Related Pregnancy Outcomes

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 230-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.J. Skull ◽  
G.H. Slater ◽  
J.E. Duncombe ◽  
G.A. Fielding
Author(s):  
Karen S. Greiner ◽  
Jamie O. Lo ◽  
Rosa J. Speranza ◽  
Mónica Rincón ◽  
Richard M. Burwick

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanapak Wisetmongkolchai ◽  
Fuanglada Tongprasert ◽  
Kasemsri Srisupundit ◽  
Suchaya Luewan ◽  
Kuntharee Traisrisilp ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectivesTo compare the rate of fetal loss in pregnancy after second trimester amniocentesis between procedures performed by experts and non-experts and to assess other pregnancy complications as secondary outcomes.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed on singleton pregnancies that underwent mid-trimester amniocenteses in a single institution. The fetal loss rates of procedures performed by experts and non-experts were collected and analyzed. Other adverse pregnancy outcomes were also examined.ResultsIn total, 14,450 amniocenteses were performed during the study period. These included 11,357 (78.6%) procedures in the group expert operators and 3,093 (21.4%) procedures in the group non-expert operators. In the non-expert group, the fetal loss rate was slightly increased but not significantly (p=0.24).In addition, the higher number of spontaneous abortions was associated with blood-stained amniotic fluid sample (p<0.001; RR=9.28). Multiple needle insertions also increased in the non-expert group significantly. However, no difference in pregnancy outcomes was found between in single and multiple needle insertions.ConclusionsThe amniocentesis procedures performed by the non-experts was not increase the fetal loss rate. However, the other adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth, low birth weight and fetal growth restriction were significantly increased in the non-expert group.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (06) ◽  
pp. 523-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Mellnick ◽  
Anthony Shanks ◽  
Methodius Tuuli ◽  
Anthony Odibo ◽  
George Macones ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 89 (8) ◽  
pp. 1011-1016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelias Msyamboza ◽  
Emma Savage ◽  
Gertrude Kalanda ◽  
Peter Kazembe ◽  
Sabine Gies ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mei Peng ◽  
Ya-Li Deng ◽  
Ling Yu ◽  
Yan-Ting Nie ◽  
Ting Luo ◽  
...  

Objective: To explore the early preventive treatment of hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis (HTGP) in pregnancy. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed to examine the drug intervention on recurrent HTGP and related pregnancy outcomes among women who had HTGP in their past pregnancy and developed hyperlipidemia during the second pregnancy. Participants were identified through inpatient case records under a single physician at the clinic and divided into two groups. The intervention group was given metformin lipid-lowering combined with low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent thrombosis when hypertriglyceridemia was developed during the pregnancy. In contrast, the non-intervention group includes those who did not receive active drug treatment until they developed recurrent HTGP. Metabolic markers were also examined by comparing them with their respective past pregnancies. Results: All participants experienced elevated triglycerides during their two consecutive pregnancies. No pregnant women developed HTGP in the intervention group (n=12), while 10 of 13 (76.9%) women developed HTGP in the non-intervention group. Thus, the outcome seemed to be markedly different. In the intervention group, 11 women were gestated to term, and one was premature; one of 12 (8.3%) births was neonatal asphyxia; there was no low-weight birth, and the prognosis of mother and baby was favorable. Of 10 women who developed recurrent HTGP in the non-intervention group, four suffered from fetal loss, four had premature, and two had full-term delivery; among the three pregnant women without HTGP, one had a premature and two had full-term births; five of thirteen (38.5%) births were neonatal asphyxia. Conclusion: Pregnant women with HTGP history, if not treated, are likely to develop the condition recurrently during pregnancy, but timely intervention on hypertriglyceridemia with lipid-lowering and thrombosis-preventing seemed complete to reduce the recurrent HTGP and improve the pregnancy outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-42
Author(s):  
Sameena Chowdhury ◽  
Sharmin Abbasi

Dengue fever during pregnancy is increasing day by day in Bangladesh. The knowledge of adverse effects on mother and neonate remains limited and there are also lack of management guideline in this regard. Mortality rate for severe dengue fever is 0.8–2.5%, and pregnancy should be considered as a coexisting risk factor for serious infection. However, the maternal and fetal outcomes not fully understood. Some review articles on outcomes of neonates born to mother with dengue fever was reported, and demonstrated that preterm birth and low birth weight were the most common adverse pregnancy outcomes; however, dengue fever was not significantly associated with these adverse outcomes, suggesting that symptomatic dengue fever may indicate risk. Other adverse effects such as stillbirth or postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to brief review of recent management guideline of OGSB about dengue fever in pregnancy. Bangladesh J Obstet Gynaecol, 2019; Vol. 34(1): 36-42


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document