scholarly journals Congestive Heart Failure in Diphtheric Myocarditis

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 71-80
Author(s):  
A. M. Prasodo ◽  
M. Narendra ◽  
A. Joernil ◽  
Wahjoenarso Wahjoenarso ◽  
F. Kaspan

The picture of congestive heart failure in diphtheric myocarditis was mainly determined by poor general condition, hepatic enlargement + epigastric pain, dyspnea. Basal rales and peripheral edema were not observed. Cardiomegaly on X-ray examination supported the diagnosis. Congestive heart failure as a complication of diphtheric myocarditis occurred in 31.2% - 52% of cases with severe ECG changes and only in 5% of cases with ST depression or T wave changes. Of 29 cases with congestive heart failure only 3 survived. Apparently good results of digitalis treatment were obtained when only gallop rhythm, as an early sign of heart failure, was found. Extensive myocardial damage by diphtheria toxin may explain why no beneficial effect of digitalis treatment was obtained. Prophylactic digitalization before signs of congestive heart failure appeared, as suggested by several authors; was not performed in this study.

2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 1173-1177 ◽  
Author(s):  
YEN-HUNG LIN ◽  
LIAN-YU LIN ◽  
YING-SHREN CHEN ◽  
HUI-CHUN HUANG ◽  
JEN-KUANG LEE ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Kennedy ◽  
Barry Simon ◽  
Harrison J. Alter ◽  
Paul Cheung

2004 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Sarzi Braga ◽  
Raffaella Vaninetti ◽  
Antonio Laporta ◽  
Anna Picozzi ◽  
Roberto F.E Pedretti

1997 ◽  
Vol 134 (6) ◽  
pp. 1133-1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicens Martí ◽  
Manel Ballester ◽  
Mercedes Rigla ◽  
Jagat Narula ◽  
Lluis Bernà ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 55 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 28-33
Author(s):  
Branislava Kovacevic ◽  
Miroslav Stajnic ◽  
Nadica Cemerlic-Adjic ◽  
Jadranka Dejanovic

Non-Q myocardial infarction represents a specific entity of infarction. Many studies have shown that non-Q myocardial infarction differs from Q myocardial infarction not only electrocardiographically, but also from pathophysiological, histological, clinical and prognostic points of view. Non-Q myocardial infarction - terminology Until 1980's, anatomical terminology depending on ECG changes was used in the literature. Subendocardial infarction referred to non-Q myocardial infarction, while transmural infarction referred to Q myocardial infarction. Since it was established that presence or absences of Q waves is a non-specific marker of transmural necrosis, in 1982 Spodick proposed the use of terms based on ECG findings. Diagnostic criteria for non-Q myocardial infarction Elevation of markers of myocardial damage (CK, CK-MB, Troponin) is the most significant criterion for diagnosis of non-Q myocardial infarction. It cannot be made without this criterion because non-Q myocardial infarction may have ECG changes identical to those in unstable angina. Authors do not agree which type of initial ECG changes is the most frequent (ST elevation ST depression or inverted T waves). Conclusion Non-Q myocardial infarction represents a specific entity of myocardial infarction. Anatomically, based on the extension of necrosis, non-Q myocardial infarction is subendocardial but it can be transmural as well. ECG changes in non-Q myocardial infarction may be identical to those in unstable angina. Therefore, elevation of cardiac enzymes is the golden standard in diagnosis of non-Q myocardial infarction.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anam Liaqat ◽  
Rao Saad Ali-Khan ◽  
Muhammad Asad ◽  
Zakia Rafique ◽  
Syed Shahzad Hasan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has led to a major public health crisis globally. Currently, myocardial damage is speculated to be associated with COVID-19, which can be seen as one of the main causes of death of patients with COVID-19. Therefore, in this study, we aim to investigate the effects of COVID-19 diagnosed patients on myocardial injury. Methods: A prospective study was conducted among 201 patients with COVID-19 in the Pakistan Military Hospital from April 1 to August 31, 2020, including non-critical cases and critical cases. COVID-19 patients were stratified as critical and non-critical according to signs and symptoms with those requiring intensive care and ventilator support as critical and those don’t require ventilator support as non-critical Results: A total of 201 COVID-19 patients with critical and non-critical categories presented with myocardial injury. All patients with myocardial injury had an elevation in CKMB and Trop 1 levels. Of these patients, 43.7% presented with new electrocardiography (ECG) changes, ST depression is observed in 36.3% patients, and 16.9% presented with abnormal electrocardiogram findings, with right ventricular dilatation and dysfunction. Results analyzed by a logistic regression model showing COVID-19 direct contribution to myocardial injury in these patients. Conclusion: COVID-19 disease directly leads to cardiovascular damage among critical and non-critical patients. Myocardial injury is associated not only with abnormal ECG changes but also with myocardial dysfunction on echocardiography and more commonly observed among critical patients.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e024007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ju young Hong ◽  
Je Sung You ◽  
Min Joung Kim ◽  
Hye Sun Lee ◽  
Yoo Seok Park ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo develop new nomograms by adding ECG changes (ST depression or tall T wave) and age to three conventional scoring systems, namely, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) scale, Hunt and Hess (HH) system and Fisher scale, that can predict prognosis in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) using our preliminary research results and to perform external validation of the three new nomograms.DesignRetrospective, observational studySettingEmergency departments (ED) of two university-affiliated tertiary hospital between January 2009 and March 2015.ParticipantsAdult patients with SAH were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were age <19 years, no baseline ECG, cardiac arrest on arrival, traumatic SAH, referral from other hospital and referral to other hospitals from the ED.Primary outcome measuresThe 6 month prognosis was assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). We defined a poor outcome as a GOS score of 1, 2 or 3.ResultsA total of 202 patients were included for analysis. From the preliminary study, age, ECG changes (ST depression or tall T wave), and three conventional scoring systems were selected to predict prognosis in patients with SAH using multi-variable logistic regression. We developed simplified nomograms using these variables. Discrimination of the developed nomograms including WFNS scale, HH system and Fisher scale was superior to those of WFNS scale, HH system and Fisher scale (0.912 vs 0.813; p<0.001, 0.913 vs 0.826; p<0.001, and 0.885 vs 0.746; p<0.001, respectively). The calibration plots showed excellent agreement. In the external validation, the discrimination of the newly developed nomograms incorporating the three scoring systems was also good, with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve value of 0.809, 0.812 and 0.772, respectively.ConclusionsWe developed and externally validated new nomograms using only three independent variables. Our new nomograms were superior to the WFNS scale, HH systems, and Fisher scale in predicting prognosis and are readily available.


2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1063-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuhiro Takasugi ◽  
Kazuhiko Nishigaki ◽  
Tomoki Kubota ◽  
Kunihiko Tsuchiya ◽  
Kenji Natsuyama ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document