scholarly journals To Compare the Incidence of Post-Dural Puncture Headache Using 25G Quincke and 25G Whitacre Spinal Needles in Patients Undergoing Lower Segment Caesarean Section

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 1014-1019
Author(s):  
Aditya Rameshbabu Devalla ◽  
Sanjot S. Ninave ◽  
Amol P. Singam

BACKGROUND Spinal anaesthesia is the first preference of anaesthesia in obstetric surgery. Post dural puncture headache (PDPH) is more common after C-section in young parturients. In the present world which is developing and fast-paced, brisk recovery along with minimal side effects & importantly early ambulation are now the need of the hour. This headache is more worrying to the mother who is required to tend to the newborn baby. This study compared the incidence of PDPH subsequent to subarachnoid blockade for lower segment Caesarean section (LSCS) 25G Whitacre & 25G Quincke needles. We wanted to compare the incidence of PDPH using 25G Quincke and 25G Whitacre spinal needles in patients undergoing LSCS. METHODS Two hundred (ASA II) American Society of Anaesthesiologists 11 females who were pregnant and in the age group of 20 - 50 years, planned to get sub-arachnoid blockade for C-section, were assigned randomly into two equal groups (N = 100 each). Both groups received spinal anaesthesia with 25-gauge Quincke and 25 gauge Whitacre needle. Postoperatively, incidence, site, onset, severity and duration of headache was studied. RESULTS The incidence of post spinal headache was 6 % in the Quincke group. No patients in Whitacre group had PDPH. The number of lumbar punctures required for successful sub arachnoid block was recorded in both the groups. 92 % patients from group Q and 88 % patients from group W required only one puncture. 8 % patients from group Q and 12 % patients from group W required two punctures. CONCLUSIONS It is prudent to conclude that 25G Whitacre spinal needle is a better alternative to 25G Quincke needle for reducing the incidence of post dural puncture headache in patients undergoing lower segment Caesarean section. KEY WORDS Spinal Anaesthesia, Post Dural Puncture Headache, Caesarean Section

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (01) ◽  
pp. 551-558
Author(s):  
Suman K. Dabi ◽  
◽  
Vandana Mangal ◽  

Aims: Spinal anaesthesia is a standard anesthetic technique in obstetrics, as it provides good analgesia and muscle relaxation. But every procedure comes with certain side effects and complications. Lumbar puncture for subarachnoid block is done by either median or paramedian approach. Besides postoperative headache, other side effects like nausea, vomiting have been reported in the postoperative period. Hereby we conducted a study on patients undergoing lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) under spinal anaesthesia by either median or paramedian approach, and compared the occurrence of post dural puncture headache in both groups. Methods and Material: 400 parturients of ASA grade I & II who underwent LSCS under spinal anaesthesia were divided into two groups: Group M (n=200) received spinal block by median approach while Group PM (n=200) received by paramedian approach. We observed the difference in proportion of cases who develop post dural puncture headache (PDPH) in both study groups and also to determine the difference in mean time duration of development of PDPH in both groups. Statistical analysis used:The data was analysed by using chi-square and T-test where p<0.05 was considered as statistically significant Results: 5 patients (2.5%) in group M developed PDPH whereas only 1 patient(0.5%) in group PM developed PDPH which was statistically non-significant (p=0.099). The mean time duration of onset of PDPH was similar in both groups. Conclusions:Hence from our observations we conclude that there is no statistically significant difference in the incidence of occurrence of PDPH when lumbar puncture is done with 25 G by either median or paramedian approach.


2021 ◽  
pp. 228-228
Author(s):  
Vishal Vashist ◽  
Roohani Mahajan ◽  
Bhanu Gupta

Subarachnoid block is commonly employed for caesarean deliveries, by virtue of its simplicity in terms of performance, safety for the parturients as compared to general anesthesia. The case history of a 27-yearold female parturiant patient is presented. She was posted for emergency lower segment caesarean section in view of primigravida with breech presentation in labour . She was obese with bodyweight of 102 kg. She had a thick scaly plaque over the back in midline from L1 to L5 area, which is contraindication for administration of spinal anaesthesia via standard median and paramedian approach . Taylor’s approach for administration of the same was tried and proved successful, thus saving the patient from receiving general anaesthesia .


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-20
Author(s):  
Niroj Hirachan

Introductions: Spinal anesthesia is a safe and acceptable technique for patients undergoing caesarean section because it provides both excellent analgesia and muscle relaxation. Post Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH) is frequently reported complication after spinal anesthesia. This study evaluates the incidence of PDPH following early mobilization and recumbency after caesarean section. Methods: This prospective, randomized comparative interventional study included 100 parturients women of age 18 to 45 years, ASA I and II, randomly divided into two groups – Ambulatory ‘A’ and Recumbent ‘R’. At the end of caesarean section, patients were advised to either lie in recumbent position for 24 hours or mobilize as soon as they become ambulatory after spinal aneshthesia. Occurrence of headache were recorded at 24 hours, 72 hours and 7th day. Software SPSS 16, chi-square test was used for proportions like incidence and severity of PDPH; p<0.05 was taken as significant. Results: The incidence of PDPH was statistically not different (p = 0.361) in Group R 8% (4 patients) and in Group A 6% (3 patients). In both the groups, the severity of headache was mild to moderate with only mild headaches in the Group A (p = 0.549). Conclusions: Early ambulation following spinal anesthesia for caesarean section did not increase the incidence of PDPH in parturients.  


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (24) ◽  
pp. 1845-1847
Author(s):  
Sanjot Ninave ◽  
Aditya Rameshbabu Devalla

Fine gauze spinal needles are known to decrease the incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia. We present a rare case of syncopal attack in a patient posted for caesarean section. A patient undergoing elective surgery with inadequate anxiolysis can have a rare chance of a syncopal attack. Hence, high level of suspicion and management of a vasovagal attack is vital. The most common mechanism of syncope is reflex mediated, which can be ‘neurally’ or ‘vasovagally’, and it characteristically develops in the sitting or upright position but may occur in supine position also.1,2 It is characterized by a rapid onset, brief duration, and with a spontaneous recovery. Anxious and apprehensive patients prior to any surgical or anaesthetic procedure can lead to a vasovagal syncope, especially in young females.3 Medline search did not reveal any case report regarding the vasovagal syncope just after spinal needle insertion in young females undergoing spinal anaesthesia. Spinal anaesthesia is the most common anaesthesia performed for lower segment caesarean section (LSCS). A case of syncopal attack with sequence of events, during the insertion of a 25 G Whitacre spinal needle, in a parturient posted for emergency lower segment caesarean section, is discussed here.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document